Re: Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

2010-03-17 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:05 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Nigel Jones wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Nick Bebout wrote: >>> > What is everyone's thoughts about us sponsoring a Freenode server?  Their >>> >

Re: Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

2010-03-17 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2010-03-17 03:58:42 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > I think the good citizen thing to do for freenode would be to host a > server. We do use them extensively, giving back is the right thing to do. > But the above points do give me serious pause and are good points. What > do other think? I'd be -1 t

Re: Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

2010-03-17 Thread Matt Domsch
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:39:10PM -0500, Nick Bebout wrote: > I think it would be a good idea, especially since we use them so much for > our IRC channels, it'd be nice to contribute a server back to the network. thanks Nick for looking into this again. Indeed, part of the reason I want to help

Re: Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

2010-03-17 Thread Ian Weller
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:59:12PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > Other than the usual reasons for not running an IRC server, the main > thing that would bother me would be that the IRC server software > wouldn't be managed by installing RPM packages since it seems that > they compile & install the

Re: Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

2010-03-17 Thread David Nalley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Nigel Jones wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Nick Bebout wrote: >> > What is everyone's thoughts about us sponsoring a Freenode server?  Their >> > general requirements are noted on http://freenode.net/hosting

Re: Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

2010-03-17 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Nick Bebout wrote: > What is everyone's thoughts about us sponsoring a Freenode server? Other than the usual reasons for not running an IRC server, the main thing that would bother me would be that the IRC server software wouldn't be managed by installing RPM pack

Re: Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

2010-03-17 Thread Mike McGrath
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Nigel Jones wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Nick Bebout wrote: > > What is everyone's thoughts about us sponsoring a Freenode server?  Their > > general requirements are noted on http://freenode.net/hosting_ircd.shtml > > and I've discussed them with mmcgrath and he

Re: Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

2010-03-17 Thread Nigel Jones
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Nick Bebout wrote: > What is everyone's thoughts about us sponsoring a Freenode server?  Their > general requirements are noted on http://freenode.net/hosting_ircd.shtml > and I've discussed them with mmcgrath and he has said they seem doable, > probably on telia1

Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

2010-03-17 Thread Nick Bebout
What is everyone's thoughts about us sponsoring a Freenode server? Their general requirements are noted on http://freenode.net/hosting_ircd.shtml and I've discussed them with mmcgrath and he has said they seem doable, probably on telia1 or osuosl1. Basically we'd be providing them a xen guest wit

Re: main problems of fedora?

2010-03-17 Thread Seth Vidal
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Jose Mathew Manimala wrote: > On 3/18/2010 12:10 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Gergely Buday wrote: >> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> is there a list of known deficiencies of fedora - I mean those which >>> can be cured by developing new software, rather than fixing

Re: main problems of fedora?

2010-03-17 Thread Jose Mathew Manimala
On 3/18/2010 12:10 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Gergely Buday wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> is there a list of known deficiencies of fedora - I mean those which >> can be cured by developing new software, rather than fixing bugs? Or, >> if such list does not exist, can you name a f

Re: [PATCH] expose MM crawler logs on bapp01

2010-03-17 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2010-03-17 01:25:40 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Matt Domsch wrote: > > > My goal here is to expose the mirrormanager crawler logs, which are on > > bapp01:/var/log/mirrormanager/crawler/ > > via the web URL: > > http://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/crawler/ > > > > Do

Re: [PATCH] expose MM crawler logs on bapp01

2010-03-17 Thread Mike McGrath
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Matt Domsch wrote: > My goal here is to expose the mirrormanager crawler logs, which are on > bapp01:/var/log/mirrormanager/crawler/ > via the web URL: > http://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/crawler/ > > Does this look right to do that? I can't easily test this in sta

Re: Questions: Change management

2010-03-17 Thread Mike McGrath
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Jose Mathew Manimala wrote: > Hello, > I had a quick question - how we do change management in fedora? Is it > using the tracs ticket system? Do we have a process defined on the wiki > that someone could point me to? > We really don't. During a non-change freeze. It's

Questions: Change management

2010-03-17 Thread Jose Mathew Manimala
Hello, I had a quick question - how we do change management in fedora? Is it using the tracs ticket system? Do we have a process defined on the wiki that someone could point me to? -- Kind Regards Jose M Manimala http://josemanimala.eu.org Ph: +919884065040 GPGkeyID: 1BE49F39 0x8AEA40EB

[PATCH] expose MM crawler logs on bapp01

2010-03-17 Thread Matt Domsch
My goal here is to expose the mirrormanager crawler logs, which are on bapp01:/var/log/mirrormanager/crawler/ via the web URL: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/crawler/ Does this look right to do that? I can't easily test this in staging, so want an additional set of eyes. Thanks, Ma

Re: Fwd: Broken dependencies: linphone

2010-03-17 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:14:55AM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: >> Can the script that generates the mail aliases for the package owners >> be modified to only look at owners for current versions?  I used to >> own linphone and ortp but tran