Re: [Fedora] Plan Stage 0: Move to Zanata

2014-07-22 Thread Noriko Mizumoto
OH! no! I am terribly sorry for the top post. (2014年07月23日 14:10), Noriko Mizumoto wrote: Hi Dimitris No, plan atm. Other than zanata and translatewiki, no alternate has been named on the MLs so far, while I see there are a number of people supporting Zanata. In terms of resource availability,

Re: [Fedora] Plan Stage 0: Move to Zanata

2014-07-22 Thread Noriko Mizumoto
Hi Dimitris No, plan atm. Other than zanata and translatewiki, no alternate has been named on the MLs so far, while I see there are a number of people supporting Zanata. In terms of resource availability, Zanata team comes up and offers full support on this move. There is no allocatable resou

Re: Followup on Atomic composes

2014-07-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:07:39AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > In the meantime though, Atomic still needs a mechanism to *try* code > that's in development. So I may look at having the internal compose > server be a "pull from COPR" type thing and thus be a remix (again), but > improve on the cu

Re: Moving Taskotron to Production

2014-07-22 Thread Tim Flink
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:12:36 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:56:12 -0600 > Tim Flink wrote: > > > Now that Taskotron staging is up and running, I'm not sure what's > > generally required for services before moving to production. > > > > I'm still working out a few kinks in th

Re: Moving Taskotron to Production

2014-07-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:56:12 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > Now that Taskotron staging is up and running, I'm not sure what's > generally required for services before moving to production. > > I'm still working out a few kinks in the initial production systems > but I think that the only big thing lef

Moving Taskotron to Production

2014-07-22 Thread Tim Flink
Now that Taskotron staging is up and running, I'm not sure what's generally required for services before moving to production. I'm still working out a few kinks in the initial production systems but I think that the only big thing left is the proxy settings, which I'm leaving alone for the moment.

Re: [Fedora] Plan Stage 0: Move to Zanata

2014-07-22 Thread Dimitris Glezos
Noriko, do you plan to also evaluate Pootle or research other alternatives? -d On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Noriko Mizumoto wrote: > (This mail is cc'd to Infra and websites teams as this activity may > impact Infra and websites teams.) > > Hi all translators, > > With all suggestions/idea

Followup on Atomic composes

2014-07-22 Thread Colin Walters
From: 15:36:25 walters: i have it working for the TC/RC process. I need to change up a few things. not yet looked at doing it for rawhide/branched yet Are there any blockers to setting up the rawhide/branched parts? Anything I can help with? In particular, will these composes write trees to the

Re: [Fedora] Plan Stage 0: Move to Zanata

2014-07-22 Thread Teguh DC
Hi, Can you add Indonesian (id) in this test instance, please? On Jul 18, 2014 10:23 PM, "Marcelo Barbosa" wrote: > Noriko, > >Thanks, I've created new language "pt_BR" and I make more tests and > validation this environment. > > firemanxbr > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Noriko Mizu

Fedora Atomic Infrastructure Meeting: July 21, 2014

2014-07-22 Thread Brian Proffitt
== #atomic: Atomic infrastructure == Meeting started by jzb at 15:03:13 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/atomic/2014-07-21/atomic.2014-07-21-15.03.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Minimum fo