Re: Upcoming MirrorManager changes (removal of Internet2 support)

/me sheds a small tear. That was a clever hack in the days before ubiquitous 1Gb+ connections and when so many supporters were on Internet2. I agree it's no longer meaningful. Thanks for recognizing the bitrot and excising it! -Matt On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 8:45 AM Neil Hanlon wrote: > On Mon,

OpenARC package review, FI use?

The goal of ARC is to improve deliverability of mail that passes through intermediary administrative domains, which given DKIM, DMARC, and SPF policies, might otherwise be quarantined, rejected, or silently dropped. Common examples of Intermediaries are mailing lists, alumni or professional email

Re: MirrorManager 1.4.x in the repos

Are we calling it mirrormanager2-0.7.1 or bumping the epoch? On Feb 6, 2016 8:49 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 08:05:25 -0600 > Matt Domsch <m...@domsch.com> wrote: > > > MM team - it doesn't make sense to keep MM 1.4.4 in t

MirrorManager 1.4.x in the repos

MM team - it doesn't make sense to keep MM 1.4.4 in the Fedora and EPEL repos any more, if ever it did. However, the mirrormanager-client package is convenient to have for mirror admins. Would someone care to package MM 2.x and push to the repos, or should I deprecate (and block from F24) the

Re: How mirrormanager works

On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:40:49PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Hi Matt, I would like to run by you my understanding of how mirrormanager works, I hope I am not to far from the truth but please if I am let me know :) Mirrormanager is splitted into three parts: the UI, the API and a

Re: Anonymized access log from a fedora mirror

to generate such a mapping, and keep it private, though. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

MirrorManager outage root cause

At approximately 01:00 UTC today, clients requesting the mirror list started getting timeouts, then HTTP 503 errors generated by the MirrorManager mirror list processes. On the Fedora Infrastructure application servers, the loads spiked, the out-of-memory killer started firing, and chaos ensued.

break freeze request: increase MM crawler timeout

would think...) Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

HOTFIX: MM crawler (ticket #3268)

bapp02 to address this. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO --- crawler_perhost 2010-09-06 14:46:21.0 + +++ crawler_perhost 2012-05-12 01:20:54.604906708 + @@ -348,21 +348,24 @@ break return pref

MirrorManager hackfest?

forward on new MM features on the TG2 base. Who's interested? Thanks, Matt [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Blacksburg_2012#Hackfests_.26_Workshops -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO ___ infrastructure mailing list

[PATCH 0/2] templatize rsyncd.conf for master mirrors

Wanting some extra eyes on this, as I haven't mucked with puppet templates that much. This should cause the download* servers /etc/rsyncd.conf file to get populated from a template, so it isn't a cut-and-paste plus file copy x7 operation just to update the rsync ACLs. Thanks, Matt -- Matt

Re: [PATCH 2/2] templatize rsyncd.conf for master mirrors

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:08:14AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 11:02 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: From 4a42171734609da4c1e57012e64f9004ccd6f704 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Domsch mdom...@fedoraproject.org Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:54:07 + Subject: [PATCH 2/2

Re: [EZNETSOLS #25448] [OSS] Fedora 15 staged for mirroring, release Tuesday

] and the bandwidth spike, but it should give us more synced mirrors. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO diff --git a/modules/rsync/files/rsyncd.conf.download01 b/modules/rsync/files/rsyncd.conf.download01 index e01e6d1..d5cebd2 100644 --- a/modules/rsync/files/rsyncd.conf.download01

Re: Opening subscriptions to mirror-list{,-d} ?

distributed, and AFAIK no one maintains a list of RHEL mirrors aside from those listed in MM, making it @fp.o makes sense. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: rss feeds for mailing lists

On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:18:38AM -0700, Clint Savage wrote: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com wrote: Greetings. We have an old ticket to add some kind of rss feed for out mailing lists: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1002 I added

Re: New entrant

/Infrastructure/Mirroring for details on what we'd look for from a mirror. Thanks, Matt Fedora Mirror Wrangler -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Varnish

capable of serving those needs as well. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[PATCHES] more mirrorlist fixes

From 2530807e1216786ea5dac8110cbb27a2f25103a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 17:15:22 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mirrorlist_server: handle bad client IP address input Signed-off-by: Matt Domsch m...@domsch.com --- mirrorlist-server

cron.daily jobs needed?

? tmpwatch - good to have Something to consider revising after the freeze? Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

[PATCH] mirrorlist_client.wsgi use select() waiting for server

From 7cd05b296ab426c386e99c3ff6f7143fbf6ed052 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 08:59:16 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] mirrorlist_client: use select() waiting on the response from mirrorlist_server Client was spinning waiting for read() to complete

Re: Change request - remove email2trac from hosted

that such doesn't work). +1 -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[PATCH] avoid \xZZ in mirrorlist urls

^/mirrorlist(.*) %= proxyurl %/mirrorlist$1 [P,L] RewriteRule ^/metalink(.*) %= proxyurl %/metalink$1 [P,L] -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: [PATCH] avoid \xZZ in mirrorlist urls

users though. (If I could, I would have been able to find and fix the root cause, which clearly this isn't). I'm open to other ideas. Perhaps what I see in the URL logs isn't what's actually being sent? I don't know... -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO

Re: [PATCH] avoid \xZZ in mirrorlist urls

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:56:12PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: Hey is there a way to test this on staging first to make sure it grabs the URLs. RewriteRules's make my head hurt and I get things backwards all the time. In staging, I can test whether or not \x gets caught. I can't test

Re: [PATCH] avoid \xZZ in mirrorlist urls

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:59:18PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:56:12PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: Hey is there a way to test this on staging first to make sure it grabs the URLs. RewriteRules's make my head hurt and I get things backwards all the time

hotfix request - bump MM max_stale_days back to 7

that hour get ignored by yum with a pretty loud error message. I've got a fix, but await end of change freeze to roll out a new MM with the fix. Until then, I'd like to return the config value back to 7 days, which papers over the propogation delay much better. +1s please. Thanks, Matt -- Matt

Re: Possibility of Fedora sponsoring a Freenode server

already exist, and point out how FreeNode benefits us, so they see an addition to FreeNode as a continuation of their support of Fedora. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ infrastructure mailing