On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 22:06, Jonathan Steffan
wrote:
>
> Kevin,
>
> Awesome. Once we sort out how we are going to support [releng] Issue #10765
> (systemd-boot signing) will this upgrade enable us to consider signing things
> like memtest?
The new version has initial support for signing PE art
+1 from me
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 at 11:45, Aurélien Bompard
wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> With Ryan we have deployed the refreshed badges stack in prod openshift,
> as the badges components are not frozen. However, the proxies are, and
> we need to update them to point at openshift instead of VMs.
> I'
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 17:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> We need a newer pungi version that adds support for kiwi and has changes
> for osbuild arm minimal. These are both things we are trying to land for
> beta.
>
> There's a 4.6.2 release upstream that we need.
> So, I'd like to build this for f39 (w
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 5:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> I don't think we are particularly vulnerable to the openssl issue(s)
> that came out today, but just to be carefull I would like to apply the
> update to all our Fedora machines and RHEL9 machines (when that update
> is available
Hey Kevin,
Not particularly venturing an opinion here, personally would like it
to stay, but then I've had native v6 at home for 10+ years
> So, we are moving more and more things over to our ocp4 cluster
> (which is great!). However, I noticed this weekend, it's going to mean
> some of our appli
> Can I get acks for the following patch to move the stable IoT composes
> to the Fedora 33 key?
> (Note: there's a single "empty" line change as well, that was a line
> with purely whitespace, which my IDE automatically cleans up.)
+1 from me
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
>
> commit 3ee8dd3f9e883414c784
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> In rawhide (and soon f33) systemd sets up a link for resolv.conf file
> since we are moving to enabling systemd-resolved by default. In mock
> chroots this is a broken link because systemd isn't actually running
> there and creating the file
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 7:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> koji 1.22.1 just was released. It's a small bugfix only release:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/koji-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/YU5CXXID6VMWMV6EBCFYIHPI5LMHTVHH/
>
> https://docs.pagure.org/koji/release_notes/release_no
> The koji 1.22.0 update added handling for the '--extra-boot-args'
> kickstart option. UNfortunately, this support wasn't working right and
> causes all our images specifying such options to fail.
>
> The good news is that the fix is just a one-liner:
>
> -cmd.extend(['--extra-boot-arg
> > 10. Our deployment infrastructure of kickstarts/pxe/tftp falls under
> > technical debt. It is based off of what we have been doing for 10+
> > years and it has broken a lot in this transition. When it works its
> > fine, and when it doesn't nothing works.
>
> I'm not sure any more 'modern' thi
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:16 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to install compose-utils on bodhi-backend01.phx2.fp.o to use
> compose-partial-copy which will rsync the compose to the /pub/.
>
> +1's please.
+1 seems sane
___
infrastructure mailin
+1 I checked the PR and it looks sane to me, also needs to be
replicated for rawhide so it's not lost.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 4:14 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The change https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_Release_Criteria_Changes
> asks for making aarch64 workstation image non-fail
+1 from me
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> There's several smallish issues in our koji:
>
> * texlive doesn't build ( https://pagure.io/koji/issue/1119 )
> * you can't use the interface to look at newRepo and other tasks made by
> a sidetag thats since been d
> Current pungi configs are using kickstarts from master branch, instead
> they should use f32 branch.
>
> This should be fixed by:
>
> https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/812
>
> Look at the last change which is this FBR is totally about.
Reviewed the change and +1 from me.
> Thanks
> Mo
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:42 PM Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can I get +1s for the following patch?
Appart from devel in the subject the patch is correct so +1 from me.
P
> Regards,
> Patrick
>
>
> From e0a17965cfa9b6e25171821a3fa4964d8d99963a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
> From: Patrick
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 4:15 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 18:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Hey, folks. Requesting a freeze break for this PR (as it applies to
> > > comps-f31.xml.in):
> > >
> > > https
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:52 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:47:00PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:41 PM Aurelien Bompard
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey folks,
> > >
> > > Last Monday, befo
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:41 PM Aurelien Bompard
wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Last Monday, before the freeze, we updated Robosignatory in prod with a few
> new features, some of which could not be tested in staging as thoroughly as
> we wanted to. As a result, the version currently in prod has issu
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 7:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 27. 09. 19 v 23:55 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > > * Populate the new datacenter with new hardware to replace old hardware
> > > that
> > > either wouldn’t survive the shipp
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:25 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> In line with the approved Fedora 31 change, packages that fail to install due
> to
> missing Python 2 dependencies are to be removed. I plan to retire the
> following
> packages (or just drop their python2 subpackages) one day before the b
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 5:09 PM wrote:
>
> From: Kevin Fenzi
>
> We need to add these in so pxe sees the right thing to boot them.
+1 from me
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Fenzi
> ---
> .../files/dhcpd.conf.noc01.phx2.fedoraproject.org| 16
>
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 2:31 PM Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can I get +1s for the patch underneath?
> This will switch from /srv/web/docs (synced from externally built docs
> sources) to /srv/docs (mount point for doc build outputs built in
> openshift).
> This is tested in staging, and t
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 6:01 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 3/30/19 9:50 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> Great, thanks! I'll be keeping an eye on the composes to see if there
> >> are any issues.
> >
> > Wasn't this disabled in the main Fedora branched
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 11:10 PM Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 16:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On 3/30/19 3:32 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 15:13 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On 3/30/19 11:35 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Stephen
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:02 PM Rick Elrod wrote:
>
> This has been in stg for a while, and I have been asked to make it live.
>
> This FBR is for permission to commit this and run the proxy playbook on
> all proxies.
+1 (but might be biased)
> Rick
>
>
>
> commit fe044fc717517d01211e1995ff9778b
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:55 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> To deal with the cloud image issue I was originally going to resolve
> it slightly differently, I've not dealt with it in oz. the current
> "Fedora version" that pungi specifies (F-22) now retains BIOS by
>
> > To deal with the cloud image issue I was originally going to resolve
> > it slightly differently, I've not dealt with it in oz. the current
> > "Fedora version" that pungi specifies (F-22) now retains BIOS by
> > default, to use UEFI you can specify F-30 and if edk2 is available it
> > will use
> > To deal with the cloud image issue I was originally going to resolve
> > it slightly differently, I've not dealt with it in oz. the current
> > "Fedora version" that pungi specifies (F-22) now retains BIOS by
> > default, to use UEFI you can specify F-30 and if edk2 is available it
> > will use
To deal with the cloud image issue I was originally going to resolve
it slightly differently, I've not dealt with it in oz. the current
"Fedora version" that pungi specifies (F-22) now retains BIOS by
default, to use UEFI you can specify F-30 and if edk2 is available it
will use that by default.
S
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:42 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:12 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've proposed a pull request to switch our Koji package to use
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I've proposed a pull request to switch our Koji package to use Python
> > > > 3 wherever possible:
> > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/koji/pull-request/4
> > > >
> > > > The PR is a bit complex, but it's based on the upstream spec for Koji,
> > > > which acc
> On Sat, 2019-03-09 at 21:29 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 2:29 PM Jonathan Dieter
> > wrote:
> > > Hey, I just noticed that, while we have zchunked metadata for the
> > > F30
> > > base repository, it's not enabled to for updates-testing.
> > >
> > > I've looked in th
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've proposed a pull request to switch our Koji package to use Python
> > 3 wherever possible:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/koji/pull-request/4
> >
> > The PR is a bit complex, but it's based on the upstream spec for Koji,
> > which accounts for all the variations (Py
> Hey everyone.
>
> As you know, we currently have a RHOSP5 ancient cloud. After a bunch of
> work last year, we got a RHOSP13 cloud up and mostly working, but it was
> a ton of work. After hearing from the Fedora Council and our various
> management chains we determined that it wouldn't really be
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 7:58 PM Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/1/18 2:43 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > patch looks good. should apply ok.
>
> Merged and playbook ran. Thanks smooge
Thanks Dusty.
P
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure
LGTM +1
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:54 PM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Can I get +1s for the patchset to allow clime to ack service and host issues
> in nagios, and to make the initial COPR notifs go to him?
>
> Patrick
>
>
> From 1994c662f8eabcec78f24a8d7b2edc155d25bac2 M
Seems fine +1
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:39 PM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Can I get +1s to make Nagios check the ticketkey age and to make it stop
> email me hourly?
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
>
> commit 3fc57e699b9c524d5683fcc39231f7b1f425bbb9 (HEAD -> master)
> Author: P
Seems sane +1 from me
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:52 PM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This should be my last FBR for now, as with this I tested everything in
> staging, and I believe it works there (SSH pull/push and HTTPS pull, we don't
> have HTTPS push for pagure.io (ye
+1 from me
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:42 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> We are trying to install a aarch64 osbs node for staging so we can get
> multi-arch containers building, but for some reason the install is not
> completing correctly. It seems to hang at:
>
> [ OK ] Started Servic
+1 from me
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> Right before freeze we got a security qemu update (which was auto
> applied) on buildvm-ppc64le-01/02. Unfortunately this broke creating
> images and since those two are our ppc64le image builder machines it's
> not
This one looks good. A massively large +1 from me :-D
> mizdebsk found problems and so this cleans them up
>
> diff --git a/master/128.5.10.in-addr.arpa b/master/128.5.10.in-addr.arpa
> index 56d713d..dd53359 100644
> --- a/master/128.5.10.in-addr.arpa
> +++ b/master/128.5.10.in-addr.arpa
> @@ -3,
> +30INPTR osbs-aarch64-master01.stg.arm.fedoraproject.org.
> +31INPTR osbs-aarch64-node01.stg.arm.fedoraproject.org.
> +32INPTR osbs-aarch64-node02.stg.arm.fedoraproject.org.
> +33INPTR osbs-aarch64-master01.arm.fe
Hi Infra team,
The schedule[1] says today is the deadline for compose tooling
completed. Are we good on this or are there still changes to that in
flight?
[1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-29/f-29-infrastructure.html
>>> I'm not fully sure what t
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> [PATCH 1/5] bodhi-pungi: f29 will be new branched target
> [PATCH 2/5] bodhi-pungi: convert image-build to use non branched
> [PATCH 3/5] bodhi-pungi: only provide one repo to lorax
> [PATCH 4/5] bodhi-pungi: s/Atomic/AtomicHost/
> [PATCH 5/5] bo
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 11:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Rawhide composes have been failing recently due to kernel changes that
> landed in the 4.17 rc2 (and thus all later) kernels. This change causes
> vm's made by oz (our cloud image creator) to not have enough randomness
> and the
Thanks Patrick,
Sounds like a herculean effort, you might want to send this to devel@ as a
FYI, you can never be quite sure what community gets up to so a heads up
there is likely useful for someone there too.
P
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, 07:27 Patrick Uiterwijk, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you maintain
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> For a long while we were plagued by a issue where our
> buildvm-armv7-01/02/03 vm's would get 'stuck' on nightly rawhide and
> branched composes.
>
> Laura found a workaround for this issue where we set a obscure sysctl
> and the
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Correcting the statement:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
> created an issue of skipping the noarch and multilib *builds* from Everything
> repo, this
> should be fixed in pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27
+1
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> We were having issues with modular rpms ending up in Everything repo and also
> missing Container variant, which should be fixed by pungi-4.1.22-7.fc27
> update.
>
> koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1055890
>
>
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Turns out in the last Bodhi 3.5 FBR, I'd added
> fedora_28_stable_master_repomd, but forgot the _testing one.
> Can I get +1s for this patch?
>
> Patrick
>
> diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2
> b/roles/
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk
>> >
>> Comment inline below.
>>
>>
>> I think aarch64 should be up with the ['x86_64', 'armhfp',
>> 'source'] list now
>
> Right, imagine that I've done that. (lines of p
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can I get +1s to fix up new-updates-sync to fix syncing f28 to the correct
> directory, and f28m (modular) as well?
Comment inline below.
> diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync
> b/roles/bodhi2/backend/fi
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Dominik Perpeet wrote:
> Dear Fedora Infra,
>
> it's time to close the CI feedback loop!
>
> We have been working on adding CI to Fedora for a little while now but this
> has not really had a visible effect since there are no consequences when
> tests pass or fail.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
> I have a need for Python 3.5+ in EPEL7 (newest versions of Mailman 3 require
> it), so I tried rebuilding the Python 3.6 RPM as a parallel-installable
> package by taking advantage of our %python3_other_* macros. There's a lo
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> After we started using the new buildvm-armv7 vm's (that are running on
> aarch64 virthosts) for builds, we also tried to use them for nightly
> composes. However, for whatever reasons, they would hang and become
> unresponsive. Th
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> I want to apologize profusely -- I pushed a tiny change to the email
> aliases and completely failed to consider they are covered by FBR
> requirement.
>
> https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=fe766d267f4e31
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The actions to do this would be the following:
+1
> $ sudo -i ssh r...@bodhi-backend01.phx2.fedoraproject.org
> # su - -s /bin/bash ftpsync
> # cd /pub/fedora/linux/releases/22
> # rm -rvf ./*
> # ln -s ../21/README .
> # cd ../23
>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:26 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Per https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6375 I would like to
> add the following redirects and run the proxy playbooks.
>
> +1s?
+1 from me
> kevin
> --
>> diff --git a/files/httpd/fedorahosted-redirects.conf
>> b/fi
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> Peter notified me today that Bodhi had not been configured to use the
> pre-beta policy on F27 when the F27 release was created in Bodhi. This
> patch should do the trick.
+1 from me, can we also update the SOP to ensure this doesn't get
miss
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I ran out of time on reinstalling builders with f26 and didn't get to
> the ppc64/ppc64le/s390x ones.
>
> We are doing some testing of rich deps in rawhide that needs the latest
> f25 update for libsolv on builders.
>
> So, what I
> On 08/01/2017 04:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:23:13PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>> In stg I put it under src.stg.fp.o/pagure so it stands nicely on the side of
>>> everything else on the server and to be sure it is not going to conflict.
>>> But, do we want t
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:16:16AM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
>> COPR now operates with packages solely from official Fedora repositories.
>
> \o/
>
> Nice!
>
>> I particularly like the idea of running COPR solely in OpenShift or in RHOSP
+1 from me
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our s390 caching builder (buildvm-s390x-07) has suddenly dropped of
> the network, failing all primary s390x builds, since Koji seemingly
> doesn't (anymore) fall back to secondary urls for topurl.
> I applied the fol
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> Hello all,
> I wanted to bring up the topic of the future of Fedora's Layered
> Image Build System (FLIBS) as it pertains to OpenShift as a backend
> technology that FLIBS is built on top of.
>
> TL;DR - Does anyone care if we move FLIBS to
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> So, turns out we need one more small patch
> (https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/449.patch).
>
> I have now submitted the koji builds.
>
> Can I get +1s for that patch addition?
Looks sane +1
___
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can I get +1s to update Koji on the hubs to 1.12.0-4, as built on
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=900865?
>
> The added patch is the patch from
> https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/403, which is needed
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This was debugged and sorted out by dusty and patrick... but I'll put up the
> freeze break.
>
> +1s?
+1 from me
> kevin
> --
> commit 21567213544015bba8390c096543d892cf5bb563
> Author: Patrick Uiterwijk
> Date: Mon May 22 02:45:40 2017 +
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:52 PM, wrote:
> From: Dennis Gilmore
>
> rawhide-composer should never have been frozen. it has no impact on the
> release deliverables, and we may want to deploy changes needing changes
> on the compose box or update packages to account for rawhide changes at
> any poin
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> We are still trying to sync pkgdb to koji for epel5 packages as well as
> syncing the epel5 updates/updates-testing repos to pub. This patch stops
> both those since epel5 is EOL now.
>
> +1s?
+1
> kevin
> --
>> diff --git a/role
This is off topic for Fedora infrastructure list which is about the
Fedora hosted infra, not kernel device problems (although the problem
you mention with that wifi chip/that device is a known problem
upstream).
Peter
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:53 PM, InvalidPath wrote:
> Fellas, I noticed today,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Turns out that these three services were not yet using our global
> secure cipher set.
> This means that they have the Apache defaults, which are quite
> insecure (RC4 and no FS).
> Can I please get +1s to apply the underneath pa
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Last night, we've found that proxy14 was not up "up" the last few days
> (since it was rebooted for the RDU migration).
> Can I get +1s to get it added to noc02?
> Patch after the break.
+1
> Patrick
>
>
> commit 0e69fbf106b
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> This config needs fixing so we can push out f26-updates-testing
> updates.
>
> +1s?
+1
was this already pushed?
> --
> From 213b0df0fffa07ccbee5fbd848812d05b61bea2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> Date: Thu, 9 M
Did you need a ACK/NACK for freeze for this?
If so +1
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:50 PM, wrote:
> From: Dennis Gilmore
>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore
> ---
> roles/bodhi2/backend/files/fedora-updates-push | 9 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/roles
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Peter added 6 new builders a while back on ppc8-04. 4 of them ppc64 and
> 4 of them ppc64le. However, we have a problem with them not being able
> to mount the nfs storage from koji currently. There's some sort of very
> weird sw
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă
wrote:
> I try to build kernel linux today.
> I have this two web links to do that:
The infrastructure list isn't the right spot for this, the kernel list
is for that.
> 1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel
> # sudo dn
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 20 December 2016 at 21:14, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Just thought I'd give some feedback after using Fedora infra over a
>> long distance from the data centre.
>>
>> I&#x
Hi All,
Just thought I'd give some feedback after using Fedora infra over a
long distance from the data centre.
I'm on the NBN Sky muster satellite [1] from Aus (it's dual stack
v4/v6 for reference too). Most services are quite usable (koji/wiki is
fine) but there are some that just don't load at
+1 from me!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> From f55c6f20bc5676f62a50535dbe5c1d1eb74aae4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:42:19 +
> Subject: [PATCH] fix fedora-25-updates-testing to have correct f25 references
> for bodhi atomi
+1
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I get +1s for applying the patch at [1] to bodhi-backend03?
> This should fix the SSL problem that occurs during mashing.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1122
>
> Regards,
> Patrick
> __
+1 from me
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, wrote:
> From: Dennis Gilmore
>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore
> ---
> roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 | 16
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.in
+1 with that explanation.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> +1, but shouldn't affect any frozen hosts so go for it. ;)
>
> To clarify the plans for these machines:
>
> 10 of them are going to become the new buildhw-01 to buildhw-10
> 2 of them are going to become the new auto
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> That is the data point I wanted.
What, you didn't think I was actively engaged with Jim right through
this entire process?
So is that now a +1?
> On 14 November 2016 at 16:58, wrote:
>> If I might, I'd very much like to see this
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> +0 I would like to wait until CentOS-7 is out.
What do you mean by this?
CentOS-7 for aarch64? It's already out. Or do you mean 7.3 for
aarch64? I've been liaising with Jim Perrin on this from the aarch64
perspective and he wants it
Hi,
I'd like to enable aarch64 for EPEL-7, I was going to wait until post
F-25 GA but given we've slipped I'd like to get approval for FBR.
The change in mash configs for bodhi is as below.
Peter
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7-testing.mash
b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7-testi
+1
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> +1 Sorry for the delay
>
> On 13 November 2016 at 16:40, Robert Mayr wrote:
>> We are going to release a new website, which is running in staging now, but
>> for production I need to add this website to the syncTranslation.py scr
+1 if it's still needed.
P
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> +1
>
> This fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393579 FYI
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have fixed a few bugs in pungi for supporting the workstation ostree
> installer and I would like to get pung-4.1.10 deployed on the compose boxes.
>
> The upstream change log is:
> - pungi: Replace kickstart repo url (mark)
>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have just found the root cause of another update push issue
> regarding the repocache.
> This was caused by createrepo_c not closing updateinfo.xml.bz2 after
> it's done with it, which
> caused NFS to make a silly rename bec
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Today I released bodhi-2.2.3 upstream, to address an issue where too
> many taskotron results are being rendered on large updates, which
> causes browsers to run out of memory[0]. 2.2.3 contains only two
> patches over 2.2.2[1][2],
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've deployed a new 2.1.9 beta release to staging[0], and the RPMs are
> available in both the infrastructure testing repository[1] and a pre-
> release copr that I maintain[2]. I couldn't have done it without
> Patrick's incredible
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> On 23/08/16, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On 23 August 2016 at 14:41, Kushal Das wrote:
>> > On 22/08/16, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> >> On 22 August 2016 at 02:12, Kushal Das wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > We want to introduce new Au
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
>> Good Morning Everyone,
>>
>> With some of the changes in 2.2 we broke a couple of things on pagure and
>> since
>> we're still early in freeze, I'd like to ask if we would c
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> With the netapp maint last night, we may be able to finally take
> advantage of nfsv4 mounts. I'd like to take backup01 (when it's not
> doing any backups, ie, before 22UTC when they start) and do some
> testing to see if I can g
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Could I get +1s for this patch set?
> This will blacklist drives from WD from becoming multipath
> devices, which will fix the newly replaced drive in buildvmhost-11.
+1 here
___
infrastructur
> time ansible-playbook /srv/web/infra/ansible/master.yml -t
> fedmsgdconfig,fedmsgmonitor
>
> ie, the fedmsgdconfig and fedmsgmonitor tags over all hosts.
>
> The reason is that we added a new fedmsg cert for the not yet active
> ppc-hub. So, this shouldn't change much at all, but it will make the
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:11 PM, wrote:
> From: Dennis Gilmore
>
> move releng-sudoers to 00releng-sudoers everywhere
> drop the no longer needed ftpsync-sudo file
> ansible-priave has some changes to match
>
+1 from me.
___
infrastructure mailing lis
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:20:37 -0600
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> Seems fine to me and we can back it out if it causes problems.
>>
>> I guess we would know after tomorrows nightly composes?
>
> There was some fallout from this. The compose playboo
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> In recent fedpkg/rpkg versions (at least the ones in rawhide now) it's
> incorrectly looking for a namespaced (rpms vs anything else) lookaside
> instead of the non namespaced one we have.
>
> So, this gives:
>
> % fedpkg -v srpm
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I get +1s for the following things:
+1 from me.
> 1. Upgrade FAS to 0.12.0: this release includes hooks for spam checks, and is
> currently running in Staging.
> 2. Installation of basset01.phx2 prod (not per se freeze br
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
