Re: Questions about ask.fp.o

Hi On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * Moderation actually works MUCH MUCH better. All new users are > moderated, but then if any moderator approves them they are free to > post and all other moderators don't see them in their queue anymore. > Also, there's a easy 'spa

Re: Ask Fedora and SPAM again

Hi On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi, > > I've filed an RFE for Akismet alternatives: > http://askbot.org/en/question/12507/alternatives-to-akismet/ > > Mollom looks nice, and it's open source too. There's already a > django-mollom module available: > https://pypi.python.

package changes and comps

Hi Not sure whether fedmsg or something else can handle this but throwing it out there if anyone is interested. I just split up a package which is listed in comps.xml and it would have been quite easy to miss adding the sub package (deja-dup-nautilus in this case) and new users wouldn't get the n

Re: packages and bugs

HI On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 07:03:24 -0400 > > Well, the footer says: > > "Found a bug? File a ticket. Note: There's some caching going on here. > If you expect something and don't see it, check back in 5 minutes." > > So, it should really be pretty

packages and bugs

Hi https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ apparently caches the bug list and seems out of date and misleading. How often is the cache updated? For example, https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/opus/bugs/all shows no bug report filed while bugzilla search gives a more current status. Rahul

Re: Python/Django developers needed: Ask Fedora

Hey Mayank, On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Mayank Jha wrote: > > Hey, I am also willing to contribute. I know django, pretty much. >> >> > Thank you for volunteering. Take a look at > > > http://askbot.

Re: Python/Django developers needed: Ask Fedora

Hi On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:30 AM, wrote: > Awesome! I can do this, I can have something by Thursday :) been very busy > with my new job but am off the day after tomorrow > Thank you. Would you mind providing a status update when you are ready? Appreciate your help. Rahul ___

Re: Python/Django developers needed: Ask Fedora

Hi On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Mayank Jha wrote: > Hey, I am also willing to contribute. I know django, pretty much. > > Thank you for volunteering. Take a look at http://askbot.org/en/question/12686/english-rss-feed-show-non-english-posts/ Rahul __

Re: Python/Django developers needed: Ask Fedora

Hi On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nerdsville LLC wrote: > I do django and would be interested > Excellent. Thanks for volunteering. Here is a feature request for you to get started http://askbot.org/en/question/11506/rfe-when-marking-as-duplicate-let-users-specify-the-duplicate-question/ T

Python/Django developers needed: Ask Fedora

Hi Ask Fedora (http://ask.fedoraproject.org) uses Askbot which is a Django based web application. We need a few developers to implement some bug fixes and features for askbot and while upstream developers are active, our requirements are pretty high. So if anyone here wants to help out, please

Re: fedmsg in Debian

Hi On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > You can do that already. The 'youtube-dl' package offers this > capability, and you can download any of these videos now in the free > webm format. Yes, I happen to be a co-maintainer of youtube-dl but I think publishing the videos

Re: Adding Fedora applications to gnome-software as webapps

Hi On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Which the Board has asked for anyway. > Yes indeed. Rahul ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastruct

Re: Adding Fedora applications to gnome-software as webapps

Hi On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > I don't expect advanced users to use them much - we already have 100+ > tabs open in FF, one more won't hurt. > Thanks for the detailed response. It won't hurt advanced users as long as it is clearly visible in GNOME Software that it is a

Re: Adding Fedora applications to gnome-software as webapps

Hi On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi, > > I recently ran in to epiphany web apps, and how gnome-software ships > them. I think it'll be really cool to have the different fedora-apps > listed in gnome-software too along with the currently present set. I've > already submitted

Re: fedmsg in Debian

Hi On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Probably worth speaking to the marketing team about this, Rahul. I'll > bring it up on the videos ML too. We may be able to post process videos > to improve them. Thanks and if you do, I would love to see them published in a free format

Re: fedmsg in Debian

Hi On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Ricky Elrod wrote: > On 09/06/2014 01:37 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On a side note, it would be nice if Flock managed to produce such videos > > This happens already. :) See: > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQIXiF6fxPCtHw_XwHFq6nA

fedmsg in Debian

Hi Just FYI http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2014/debconf14/webm/One_year_of_fedmsg_in_Debian.webm On a side note, it would be nice if Flock managed to produce such videos Rahul ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@list

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > I've filed a trac ticket to track this: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4483 > Thanks. FWIW, I have disabled content moderation in Ask Fedora since the persistent spammer we had seems to have given up (one can

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: > This was merged upstream, and released as 1.4.2 : > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/stopforumspam/ > Thanks Michael! Ankur, can you take a look at this, please? Appreciate your help. Rahul ___

Re: Transifex has become proprietary

Hi On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > What are they? > I haven't spent a lot of time looking up alternatives but I am aware of the following: http://zanata.org/ developed by Red Hat Translatewiki which is apparently what MediaGoblin is considering https://issues.me

Transifex has become proprietary

Hi Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has become proprietary and Fedora moving to using Transifex.com has been cited as one of the reasons why it wasn't important anymore for them to maintain a open source version. https://github.com/transifex/transifex/issues/206#issuecomment-15243207 Should

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

HI On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: > I pushed directly a PR for that: > https://github.com/benjaoming/django-stopforumspam/pull/7 > > However, I didn't test it, so that likely mean it is buggy and I forgot > something :) > Thanks! Rahul ___

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Yeah. If it supported X-Forwarded-For headers we could have it use > those to get the users real address. > @Ankur, would you mind filing this request upstream? Rahul ___ infrastructure mail

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

HI On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > If we can get the package to look at a header, we might be able to add > a proxied-for header with the real ip in it? > So, what is the solution here? File a RFE upstream for functionality? Rahul __

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Chris A. Roberts wrote: > If we can use askimet we should go that route, I talked to suehle and we > can get a membership $5 for the commercial site license. It works wonders > on the Fedora Magazine. > Interesting. Fedora Magazine is hosted within Fedora

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-django-stopforumspam/el5/ > > I'll install it on staging when I get the time. How would I create spam > to test it, though? > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/stopforumspam/ claims that you can add

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-django-stopforumspam.git/tree/python-django-stopforumspam.spec > Before you branch for EPEL, you can use a scratch build perhaps in the staging environment and confirm that it works as intende

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Has it changed anything? Doesn't seem to have... > > It does. I found some spam and regular posts in the moderation queue and had to approve/reject them explicitly. Not all posts go through the queue however. Perhaps it is based on kar

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Do you know what the 'Enable content moderation' setting does? > > If this just moderates all new questions, perhaps we could do this? > Then, their spam wouldn't ever get out of the moderation queue at all. > Yes, I have done this ear

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Sadly they just did twice. ;( > > I blocked them in less than a minute, but they are definitely not gone. > I jinxed it! In any case, is it feasible for us to consider recaptcha support? About six patches we can cherry pick from upstre

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> If they're all coming in through Yahoo, then disabling that would be a >> stopgap at least until we can find a more effective a

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen > > I would say finding throttle software which allows one post per minute to > make it more expensive for them to post a lot. The goal is to make it > expensive enough that they will want to go somewhere else versus keep at it > here. >

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > If they're all coming in through Yahoo, then disabling that would be a > stopgap at least until we can find a more effective anti-spam solution. > I have done that now. Lets see if it helps Rahul

Re: Ask Fedora being badgered by spam

Hi FWIW, I have deleted well over a dozen accounts and hundred questions in the last few days and several new user accounts even after this mail was posted. It is likely a single persistent spammer and perhaps scripted. Some serious measures are needed at this point since some of us constantly d

Re: Disabling unused languages in Ask Fedora

Hi On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I only see Hungarian in production that has 0 posts. > > Greek and Chinese both have 1. > > Should we just disable Hungarian? Or also the ones with just 1 post? > I would say all three and if the local community wants it enabled again, t

Re: Disabling unused languages in Ask Fedora

Hi On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Yeah, I'm fine with disabling the ones that have 0 posts and we can try > again down the road... > Yeah. Let's do that then. Thanks! Rahul ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@li

Disabling unused languages in Ask Fedora

Hi I was happy to support I18N in Ask Fedora but its been a while and some languages are just not used at all with zero postings in them. If this continues, I think it might be better to disable them again. Thoughts? Rahul ___ infrastructure mailing l

Re: Sync github projects on fedorahosted

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > This looks really quite nice, I should have checked for it before opening > the > ticket. > What are you planning to do to preserve the history of the tickets filed in github? Rahul ___ inf

Re: Ask Fedora: Do we need to add a "solved" tag to answered questions to increase visibility in search engines

Hi On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > We don't need to clone Stack Exchange, but in order to be successful in a > similar way, we're _really_ far away. The entire notification system needs > to be rebuilt. Same with flagging and moderation in general. This is a lot > of wo

Re: Ask Fedora: Do we need to add a "solved" tag to answered questions to increase visibility in search engines

Hi On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Agreed. My points are a) it needs a big investment and will likely continue > to need it in order to keep up in usability and b) there is an opportunity > cost in chosing to put effort in any one thing. I think having community QA > i

Re: Ask Fedora: Do we need to add a "solved" tag to answered questions to increase visibility in search engines

Hi On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Miller . As > I've said before, I blame the software, not the people (and that includes > not blaming the askbot authors -- it's just a really hard act to follow and > SE is constantly improving and tweaking to get the experience just right). > There

Re: ask fedora -- explanations for edits?

Hi On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > What happened to the form where you could explain why you made an edit? Did > we lose that in the update? > Seems like it. We should get that filed upstream Rahul ___ infrastructure mailin

Re: Ask Fedora: Do we need to add a "solved" tag to answered questions to increase visibility in search engines

Hi On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > - Add "Please do not add the [Solved] keyword to your question > summaries. If you received an answer that solved the issue, please mark > the answer as correct and reward the helper with karma." to the user > guidelines. > > I think th

Re: About cnucnu web

HI On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:36:54AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > > wrote: > > > * Domain name suggestions? (release-monitoring.org, cnucnu.org, > cnucnuweb.org, > > > ?)

Re: state of the askbot

Hi On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, after the migration I guess you could go in and do these? > > Do we have a list or just want to do them as we see them? > > We don't have a list yet. The first set of tags to g

Re: state of the askbot

HI On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:21:06 -0500 > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > > I have posted at > > > > http://askbot.org/en/question/12111/improving-multi-language-support<http://askbot.org/en/question/12

Re: state of the askbot

HI On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Ok. I have the multilang support running in stg. > > I asked a question in esperanto: > > > https://ask.stg.fedoraproject.org/eo/question/190/cu-esperanto-iam-tuj-vere-popularigis/ > > Some impressions: > > * The drop down seems to put la

Re: state of the askbot

Hi On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > OK. I will give this a try in stg... do we want to try and enable this > monday if it works? It sounded like upstream was still treating it as > pretty experemental. ;( > I think we should and shake out the bugs unless they are too seve

Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

Hi On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Anshu Prateek wrote: > > mm, the task I am working on started as a simple "improve" > latency/performance of askbot which evolved into upgrade 0.7.49 which > became packaged 0.7.49. I am mostly done, now only packaging and testing on > fedora/rawhide is left.

Re: f19: call for testing/karma

On 06/19/2013 08:33 AM, Martin Kho wrote: That's nice and I am sure would be helpful but I am curious. What didn't you like about the account system? Hi Rahul, Especially the split between filing bugs in bugzilla with a Red hat account and closing the bug fixing processes (giving karma) where

Re: Updating the askfedora production theme to the Fedora blue theme

On 06/02/2013 11:15 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hi guys, I think the theme that's in use at staging[1] is pretty amazing! Is there a reason we're not updating the production instance[2] to look like this yet? If it's only a question of actually doing the work, I can do it :) [1] https://ask.stg.fedo

Re: [Askfedora] Display a few links in the main page sidebar?

On 06/03/2013 01:20 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hi folks, What do you folks think of displaying a few links in the announcement space? I've done it on the staging instance[1]. Please have a look. This is the simple code snippet that's required This looks great and has been on the list of the thing

Re: areas where we can invest in automation?

On 05/28/2013 08:33 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: I was asked (with my Red Hat hat on) to put together a little report on areas in Fedora which could be improved with an investment in better automation. I just posted some suggestions to https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-May/1834

Ask Fedora hackfest?

Hi I was thinking of proposing a hackfest on Ask Fedora for Flock (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flock) . Would anyone be interested in participating and if so, do you have any ideas on what you would like to do? Let me know and if there is sufficient interest, I would submit a proposal.

Re: Ask Fedora status update

On 05/05/2013 04:02 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: I've packaged it up and it's under review now[1]. As soon as it's approved, I'll test it over at staging and see how it goes. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959172 Thanks. You can drop a mail to upstream of django post office and let him

Re: Ask Fedora status update

Hi Ankur, On 04/25/2013 10:45 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: Ankur, I'd be glad to help brainstorm about how to fix each of these. Feel free to email me directly or get in touch on IRC if you'd like to start working through them. Did you have a chance to look at this list? If you don't have time, let

Re: Ask Fedora status update

Hi On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hello, > > I have been working on this last week. > The current status according me is: > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:50:36PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram w

Ask Fedora status update

Hi (cc'ing Ankur since he has expressed interest in helping with the admin tasks) * Form for local login is still shown in the login page even though this is disabled. This continues to cause confusion among new users and the fix is upstream https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

Hi On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > I think that Raul is talking about the code being hosted on github. > Yep. I should have been more explicit there i guess > Nothing in fedora infrastructure is proprietary. And nothing that the > user gets when interacting with our

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

On 03/05/2013 07:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Code for this provider (under GPLv2+) is available at: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fas-openid Congrats! I was wondering if we have relaxed the infrastructure policy of not relying on web infrastructure that depends on proprietary code? Rahul __

Re: Ask Fedora enhancements and fixes

Hi On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Full Name > > (yeah, this is required currently) > > > Name check override > > (this is only needed if your name is something non standard, ie, an odd > symbol, or "Nolastname") > > > Security Question > > Security Answer > > Both optiona

Re: Ask Fedora enhancements and fixes

Hi On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:11:30 -0500 > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > Hi > > > > With the recent update to Askbot, there has been a number of offlist > > discussions related to Ask Fedora and I wanted to su

Re: Ask Fedora enhancements and fixes

Hi On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Aniruddha wrote: > A quick search show that most open source communities only require minimal > input. If they are able to solve this we surely can too. > > http://forums.debian.net/ucp.**php?mode=register > > Ope

Re: Ask Fedora enhancements and fixes

Hi On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Can you send me your scratch build link again? And I can try it out in > stg? I looked and somehow got the wrong link and couldn't find your > scratch build... ;( > I have kicked off another build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/

Fwd: ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /users/3595/jomoos/

Hi I get this on all my subscribed questions in Ask Fedora Original Message Subject:ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /users/3595/jomoos/ Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:05:12 - From: askfed...@fedoraproject.org To: sysadmin-ask-memb...@fedoraproject.or

Ask Fedora enhancements and fixes

Hi With the recent update to Askbot, there has been a number of offlist discussions related to Ask Fedora and I wanted to summarize what I think needs to be done and some points to discuss * Multi-language support: This is a very commonly requested feature. Need to set ASKBOT_MULTILINGUA

Re: Proposal for adding the UniversalLanguageSelector to the Fedora Wiki

Hi The first step would be to get the extension packaged in the repository. I can look into that. It appears Santosh is the dev for this extension. I found the git url here https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki/extensions/UniversalLanguageSelector.git;a=summary Do you have release

Re: Request for resources: Darkserver

On 12/20/2011 11:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > - Who all exactly should be in the sysadmin-darkserver group and is > working on this? you and mether? any others? > > I will go ahead and look at allocating you guys a dev machine to work > from. ;) Just us on the sysadmin side. The consumers of t

Production instance of Ask Fedora

Hi I would like to do the soft launch of Ask Fedora before the end of this month and announce it widely in sync with Fedora 16 release. I will coordinate with Fedora marketing for this. The reason for doing a soft launch earlier is to be able to seed the forum with some good questions and answer

Re: Ask Fedora SOP complete

On 09/02/2011 01:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Thanks Rahul. > > We are making some last minute changes to the package to make it easier > to deploy. As soon as we have those, we can get it into puppet. > > I have most of a puppet commit to add the ask01.stg instance. Just need > to tweak it some a

Ask Fedora SOP complete

Hi All settings, customizations are now fully documented at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_Fedora_SOP Next step would be to use Puppet to automate all of this and we are good to go although I am going to continue to update to the latest versions from upstream for a while since I have a bunch

Re: Moving Ask Fedora to Staging

On 08/19/2011 09:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I assume there's no issue in the app running on multiple machines with > the same db backend. Mether? kevin Not sure this is helpful but this is the upstream answer http://askbot.org/en/question/596/multi-instances-sharing-one-db-a-problem?answer=613#6

Re: Moving Ask Fedora to Staging

On 08/19/2011 09:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > ok. So it will be: > > http://ask.fedoraproject.org ? Yes. I think we are going to not use the FAS auth plugin and instead use Fedora account as just a openid. Less code to maintain and less things to break > ok. I kinda dislike putting more in th

Re: Moving Ask Fedora to Staging

On 08/18/2011 05:48 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Should I be able to enter an answer for a question at this point? I > tried to enter a simple answer and received a database error. We were setting it up with a new db.Feel free to try now http://ask01.dev.fedoraproject.org/ Rahul ___

Moving Ask Fedora to Staging

Hi We have been running Ask Fedora in the devel instance for a while now and updated several times as upstream fixed bugs and responded to feature requests http://ask01.dev.fedoraproject.org/questions/ We have a custom CSS file thanks to Suchakra and with the help of PJP (co-sysadmin, cc'ed), w

Re: Request for resources: Ask Fedora

On 07/21/2011 04:20 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Will you want single sign on (meaning if you log into pkgdb, you are also > logged into askbot)? If not, I would suggest we try and use the openid > support in askbot with the fas openid provider. That way we may be able to > eliminate the need to

Re: Request for resources: Ask Fedora

upstream On 07/20/2011 09:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Some questions (which may not be known yet, but I thought I would toss > them out there): > > * If FAS is unavailable, how does askbot behave? No one can auth? or > falls back on a local file? or ? Askbot has openid support. Will support us

Request for resources: Ask Fedora

Hi I have just filed the RFR for Ask Fedora at https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2884 Askbot - http://askbot.org is a question and answer oriented forum that I am requesting Fedora infrastructure team. As some of you might already know, I have been working on packaging As

Re: New RFR -- Zanata instance

On 06/22/2011 02:43 PM, noriko wrote: > Dimitris Glezos さんは書きました: >> I also think we should have good documentation before requesting time >> to try out a tool -- eg. how does it compare with alternative tools >> such as Transifex, Pootle, Damned Lies, especially in the areas that >> are important

Re: Second rounds of lists clean-up

On 04/06/2011 10:43 PM, Andrea Veri wrote: > I am unsure about the current lists, I think we can't mail all > the owners again asking for a description to be added but > we can try to change this bad habit for the future. I don't think we need to mail all the owners. Only the smaller subset, doze

Re: Second rounds of lists clean-up

On 04/02/2011 08:32 PM, Andrea Veri wrote: > FP.org's mailing lists Clean-up is now DONE. On a vaguely related note, can we tell list administrators to add a brief description? I would prefer that we require all of them to have one so that we don't have mailing list literally called "abc" and w

Re: Second rounds of lists clean-up

On 04/03/2011 01:59 AM, Andrea Veri wrote: > Do you guys think this is the correct policy to adopt in these cases or > should we just remove those inactive lists while keeping their archives > handy? I believe after sometime gap, it should be completely deleted, keeping the archives handy just in

Re: Second rounds of lists clean-up

On 04/02/2011 08:32 PM, Andrea Veri wrote: > FP.org's mailing lists Clean-up is now DONE. > > Inactive lists that got deleted (and for 'deleted' please read > my note on [1]) are 33 in total. Would it be possible to hide them from https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo Disable search e

Re: Meeting Re: Eucalyptus hosting

On 01/15/2011 02:44 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > Hi, > > At the infrastructure meeting yesterday Seth brought up the topic of > cloud hosting for Fedora services. With EC2 and Rackspace being > closed platforms, I suggested Eucalyptus as an alternative. I wasn't > able to find any hosting provi