I have some preliminary success, but I am still working on it.
On Mon, 2023-11-27 at 12:23 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> David Duncan (who I've CC'd to this) has been working on writing a
> new
--
___
infrastructure mailing list --
On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 16:38 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 09. 11. 23 v 20:39 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
Well, actually, we should probibly check in on the thing thats cleaning
up the amis? and confirm that it is deleting the snapshots?
I think that is this:
roles/fedimg/templates/clean-amis.py
in
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 12:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 04:38:01PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > I had time to investigate it a bit:
>
> Thanks for digging into it.
>
> ...snip...
>
> >
> > Based on this founding I propose:
> >
> > 1) Delete **all** snapshots
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 04:38:01PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> I had time to investigate it a bit:
Thanks for digging into it.
...snip...
>
> Based on this founding I propose:
>
> 1) Delete **all** snapshots without FedoraGroup tag older than - let say -
> 2021. This way we can
Dne 09. 11. 23 v 20:39 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
Well, actually, we should probibly check in on the thing thats cleaning
up the amis? and confirm that it is deleting the snapshots?
I think that is this:
roles/fedimg/templates/clean-amis.py
in ansible.
and it does delete the snapshot... so,
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:22:57PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 06. 11. 23 v 20:45 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > Can we get what volume they are snapshots of? Perhaps the volume name
> > would help us figure things out?
>
> Most of the 6GiB volumes like snap-098326d474a07f706 is snapshot of
>
Dne 06. 11. 23 v 20:45 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
Can we get what volume they are snapshots of? Perhaps the volume name
would help us figure things out?
Most of the 6GiB volumes like snap-098326d474a07f706 is snapshot of vol- which does not exist (this snapshot is
from 2018)
Even if I
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 10:32:20AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> We have (almost) all instances and volumes properly tagged. Now let check
> Snapshots.
Thanks for continuing to drive this forward. ;)
> OMG - there are A LOT of them. The list has 97k lines! Because of the size I
> will not
Dne 03. 11. 23 v 16:15 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):
Does that mean we should set ours to FedoraGroup=coreos ?
Yes. The values are not defined. I use the values to group the resources together. If you want you can even use two
labels: coreos-dev, coreos-ci. Or just coreos. It is up to you.
--
On 11/3/23 03:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 03. 11. 23 v 2:06 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):
>> We'll clean up the ones we do not need soon. I'm sorry it is taking longer
>> than we thought it would to
>> get garbage collection implemented.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>> *
Dne 03. 11. 23 v 2:06 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):
We'll clean up the ones we do not need soon. I'm sorry it is taking longer than
we thought it would to
get garbage collection implemented.
Thank you.
* Fedora-Cloud-Base-29-20190729.0.x86_64-hvm-us-east-1-standard-0 - is this
snapshots used to
On 11/2/23 05:32, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> We have (almost) all instances and volumes properly tagged. Now let check
> Snapshots.
>
> OMG - there are A LOT of them. The list has 97k lines! Because of the size I
> will not attach it and instead provide link
> to download it:
We have (almost) all instances and volumes properly tagged. Now let check
Snapshots.
OMG - there are A LOT of them. The list has 97k lines! Because of the size I will not attach it and instead provide link
to download it: https://k00.fr/8p59mvcw
If you help me to identify something, I can
13 matches
Mail list logo
