Hi,
this sounds like a good idea.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:46:27AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> So Ralph and I wrote summershum, it's a simple database storing for each file
> in
> each package:
> - the sha1sum of the file
> - the md5sum of the tarball
It might be helpful to store
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
>
> The idea originates from a discussion between Mickael Scherrer, Ralph and
> I on
> Friday evening. Could we track all the files in every packages in the
> distribution?
>
> Ideally, this would allow us to investigate questions like:
Dne 12.2.2014 14:31, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 12.2.2014 12:44, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:46:27AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
So Ralph and I wrote summershum, it's a simple database st
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:43:18AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 02:31:28PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > > The small one is that it might be nice to include the output of `file`
> > > > on
> > > > each file.
> > Technically doable but I'm curious, what use-case
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:43:18AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Technically doable but I'm curious, what use-case do you have in mind?
> Looking for binaries, blobs, and archives that have crept in to the source.
> Also, pretty charts. :)
Also, if combined with the full-text search, one could
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 02:31:28PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > The small one is that it might be nice to include the output of `file` on
> > > each file.
> Technically doable but I'm curious, what use-case do you have in mind?
Looking for binaries, blobs, and archives that have crept i
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > The small one is that it might be nice to include the output of `file` on
> > each file.
> The `file` output would need to be store with `file` version, since its
> output is not stable in my experience.
Yeah, that's kind of unfort
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 12.2.2014 12:44, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:46:27AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >> So Ralph and I wrote summershum, it's a simple database storing for each
> >> file in
> >> each package:
> >>
Dne 12.2.2014 12:44, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:46:27AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> So Ralph and I wrote summershum, it's a simple database storing for each
>> file in
>> each package:
>> - the packages name
>> - the filename
>> - the sha1sum of the file
>>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:46:27AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> So Ralph and I wrote summershum, it's a simple database storing for each file
> in
> each package:
> - the packages name
> - the filename
> - the sha1sum of the file
> - the tarball name
> - the md5sum of the tarball
> - a
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:58:15AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>Dne 12.2.2014 09:46, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> So Ralph and I wrote summershum, it's a simple database storing for each
> file in
> each package:
> - the packages name
> - the filename
> - the sha1sum of the file
> -
Dne 12.2.2014 09:46, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> Good morning everyone,
>
> As you know Ralph and I went to DevConf last week-end, and of course, what
> happens when you put two hackers in the same room? Well they go crazy and
> start
> hacking... The result of this is summershum.
>
> The idea
Good morning everyone,
As you know Ralph and I went to DevConf last week-end, and of course, what
happens when you put two hackers in the same room? Well they go crazy and start
hacking... The result of this is summershum.
The idea originates from a discussion between Mickael Scherrer, Ralph and
13 matches
Mail list logo
