On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:43:34AM -0500, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2013 08:32:40 +0200
> Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:30:39PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Right, but then this information is security sensitive...
> > >
> > > User installed httpd-x.y-Z on Y
On Mon, 6 May 2013 08:32:40 +0200
Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:30:39PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Right, but then this information is security sensitive...
> >
> > User installed httpd-x.y-Z on -MM-DD, but on looking you don't
> > see them installing the security up
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:30:39PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Right, but then this information is security sensitive...
>
> User installed httpd-x.y-Z on -MM-DD, but on looking you don't see
> them installing the security update that was released after that ->
> target.
>
> Or even, user i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:01:06PM +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:21:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > How do we know that any particular person who installed yum installed
> > anything else? Are you using IP address to tr
On Fri, 3 May 2013 21:01:06 +0200
Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:21:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > How do we know that any particular person who installed yum
> > installed anything else? Are you using IP address to try and see
> > what each IP user installed? I can think
The framework is already in place, though abrt is bug related ... in your
use case it's simply an extension, module I would posit.
On May 3, 2013 3:13 PM, "Lukas Zapletal" wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:04:41PM -0400, Steven Acres wrote:
> > Just an idea; abrt .it's already in place.
>
> Wh
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:04:41PM -0400, Steven Acres wrote:
> Just an idea; abrt .it's already in place.
What you mean exactly?
LZ
--
Later,
Lukas "lzap" Zapletal
irc: lzap #theforeman
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedorap
Just an idea; abrt .it's already in place.
On May 3, 2013 3:01 PM, "Lukas Zapletal" wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:21:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > How do we know that any particular person who installed yum installed
> > anything else? Are you using IP address to try and see what eac
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:21:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> How do we know that any particular person who installed yum installed
> anything else? Are you using IP address to try and see what each IP
> user installed? I can think of... a lot of ways that won't work. ;)
The main issue I see is N
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:43:15AM -0400, Pablo Iranzo Gómez wrote:
> Hi, Not sure from our side, but Debian has always a package
> "popularity-contest", which automatically submitted packages to make
> those list of recommended packages.
Hello, yes this is other approach to the problem. The main
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:42:02AM -0400, Steven Acres wrote:
> This sounds akin to apt (debian), emerge (gentoo), 'recommends'.
> Added functionality but not a functional dependency. Am I on mark with
> intention?
Hi,
exactly. But this is more Google-like approach - we have the information
in th
11 matches
Mail list logo
