RE: Some questions around coprs

2013-12-04 Thread Matt_Domsch
FESCo would have to change their rules prohibiting shipping non-official repo files in the main repository. Assuming that political battle is successful... I think signing must be done by the copr creator (personally). As each copr repo is independently timed and created, I'd be OK with a freque

Re: Some questions around coprs

2013-12-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 4 December 2013 13:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So, at todays fesco meeting there was some discussion about coprs. > > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meetbot/fedora-meeting/2013-12-04/fesco.2013-12-04-17.59.log.html#l-52 And then you run into the politics of who gets shipped and who doesn't an

RE: Some questions around coprs

2013-12-04 Thread Matt_Domsch
ished Engineer, Director Dell | Software Group From: infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Stephen John Smoogen Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 3:03 PM To: Fedora Infrastructure Subject: Re: Some questions around

Re: Some questions around coprs

2013-12-04 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 13:20 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > 2. If so, do we have any ideas how signing copr packages could work? It might not be what we end up doing, but for reference, Ubuntu's PPA sign everything automatically, with an automatically generated per-PPA key: https://help.launchpad.

Re: Some questions around coprs

2013-12-05 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 12/04/2013 09:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 1. Do we even want to persue this? Not my priority. But if somebody will be willing to do it, then you are welcome. 2. If so, do we have any ideas how signing copr packages could work? I did not investigated it yet (again not priority right now) bu

Re: Some questions around coprs

2013-12-05 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/04/2013 03:52 PM, matt_dom...@dell.com wrote: > FESCo would have to change their rules prohibiting shipping > non-official repo files in the main repository. Assuming that > political battle is successful… We (FESCo) seemed to be fairly agreed

Re: Some questions around coprs

2013-12-05 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/04/2013 04:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On 4 December 2013 13:20, Kevin Fenzi > wrote: > > So, at todays fesco meeting there was some discussion about coprs. > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meetbot/f

Re: Some questions around coprs

2013-12-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 12:52:36 +0100 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 12/04/2013 09:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > 1. Do we even want to persue this? > > Not my priority. But if somebody will be willing to do it, then you > are welcome. > > > 2. If so, do we have any ideas how signing copr packages coul