pastebin plans

2019-05-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. We are currently running modernpaste for paste.fedoraproject.org. It's pretty dead upstream. The primary maintainer said they wanted to make a v2 version that was a complete re-write. That was about a year ago and nothing has happened since. ;( We have several outstanding issues agains

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-20 Thread Ben Cotton
I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the community. There are plenty of other options for people to post things (pastebin.com, GitHub gists, put a file in your web space on Fedora people, etc). I'm in favor of option 3, with a long enough timeline for the fpaste maintainers to h

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-20 Thread Justin W. Flory
On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the > community. There are plenty of other options for people to post things > (pastebin.com, GitHub gists, put a file in your web space on Fedora > people, etc). I'm in favor of option 3, with a long

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-20 Thread Langdon White
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 1:20 PM Justin W. Flory wrote: > On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the > > community. There are plenty of other options for people to post things > > (pastebin.com, GitHub gists, put a file in your web space

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-20 Thread Martin Kolman
On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 13:11 -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: > On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the > > community. There are plenty of other options for people to post things > > (pastebin.com, GitHub gists, put a file in your web spac

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-20 Thread Brian (bex) Exelbierd
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:36 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 13:11 -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: > > On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the > > > community. There are plenty of other options for people to post thi

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 13:47, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:36 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 13:11 -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: > > > On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the >

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-20 Thread Brian (bex) Exelbierd
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 8:13 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 13:47, Brian (bex) Exelbierd > wrote: > >> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:36 PM Martin Kolman wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 13:11 -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: >> > > On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wro

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-27 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, May 20, 2019 09:47:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > 3) Just stop providing a pastebin and ask people to use any of the other > ones out there. > > I see preference for this option given that fpaste continues to work. Unfortunately, fpaste cannot just paste to any server out there sinc

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-28 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:47:56AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > We are currently running modernpaste for paste.fedoraproject.org. > > It's pretty dead upstream. The primary maintainer said they wanted to > make a v2 version that was a complete re-write. That was about a year > ago a

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-31 Thread Ben Cotton
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We are currently running modernpaste for paste.fedoraproject.org. > > It's pretty dead upstream. The primary maintainer said they wanted to > make a v2 version that was a complete re-write. That was about a year > ago and nothing has happened

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 5/31/19 8:54 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> We are currently running modernpaste for paste.fedoraproject.org. >> >> It's pretty dead upstream. The primary maintainer said they wanted to >> make a v2 version that was a complete re-write. That wa

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-04 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 28. 05. 19 v 9:00 Till Maas napsal(a): > - make fpaste work with paste.centos.org +1 I use fpaste a lot. So please keep the functionality of fpaste. But I do not care to which service it will communicate. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-04 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 11:01:52 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 28. 05. 19 v 9:00 Till Maas napsal(a): > > - make fpaste work with paste.centos.org > > +1 > I use fpaste a lot. So please keep the functionality of fpaste. But I > do not care to which service it will communicate. I think this is t

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 07:27, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 11:01:52 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 28. 05. 19 v 9:00 Till Maas napsal(a): > > > - make fpaste work with paste.centos.org > > > > +1 > > I use fpaste a lot. So please keep the functionality of fpaste. But I > > do no

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-04 Thread Julen Landa Alustiza
If we are going with the approach of just one paste platform, we could just retire fpaste, add cpaste with an fpaste alias and provides on rpm spec, retire paste.fp.o and redirect it to paste.centos =) On June 4, 2019 2:25:01 PM GMT+02:00, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 07:

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-04 Thread Martin Kolman
On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 16:41 +0200, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > If we are going with the approach of just one paste platform, we could just > retire fpaste, add cpaste with an fpaste > alias and provides on rpm spec, retire paste.fp.o and redirect it to > paste.centos =) Just a note - if we go t

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
While we are looking at this, we have not talked with and gotten agreement with the person who runs cpaste server. We would need to make sure they have the resources to hold our extra load etc before we do anything like htis. On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 10:41, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > If we are g

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 08:25:01 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > CentOS has a cpaste application which might help on that. Yes. I'll look at that as a reference implementation. They did inform us, and at some point the plan was for them to look at doing it with fpaste instead of a new clie

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 16:41:22 +0200, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > If we are going with the approach of just one paste platform, we could > just retire fpaste, add cpaste with an fpaste alias and provides on > rpm spec, retire paste.fp.o and redirect it to paste.centos =) It really depends on how

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 17:12:06 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote: > On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 16:41 +0200, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > > If we are going with the approach of just one paste platform, we > > could just retire fpaste, add cpaste with an fpaste alias and > > provides on rpm spec, retire paste.fp

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 11:15:24 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > While we are looking at this, we have not talked with and gotten > agreement with the person who runs cpaste server. We would need to > make sure they have the resources to hold our extra load etc before we > do anything like hti

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-06 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 03:36, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 11:15:24 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > While we are looking at this, we have not talked with and gotten > > agreement with the person who runs cpaste server. We would need to > > make sure they have the resources

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 10:58:49 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 03:36, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 11:15:24 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > While we are looking at this, we have not talked with and gotten > > agreement with