On 02/04/2015 02:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:54:27 +0100
Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com wrote:
[root@fed-cloud10 etc(keystone_admin)]# telnet 209.132.184.9 443
Trying 209.132.184.9...
telnet: connect to address 209.132.184.9: No route to host
I am able to connect
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:54:27 +0100
Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com wrote:
[root@fed-cloud10 etc(keystone_admin)]# telnet 209.132.184.9 443
Trying 209.132.184.9...
telnet: connect to address 209.132.184.9: No route to host
I am able to connect using 172.24.0.0 network, but it would be nice
[root@fed-cloud10 etc(keystone_admin)]# telnet 209.132.184.9 443
Trying 209.132.184.9...
telnet: connect to address 209.132.184.9: No route to host
I am able to connect using 172.24.0.0 network, but it would be nice (and
required to have new OS) to be able to communicate even over public IP.