Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-09 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Sisyphus" Attached are 2 small patches - to lib/Inline/C/ParseRegExp.pm and C.pm. And attached is a rewritten (rather obvious) patch to lib/Inline/C/ParseRegExp.pm that should make patching C.pm altogether unnecessary. Further suggestions for improvem

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-09 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Sisyphus" Attached are 2 small patches - to lib/Inline/C/ParseRegExp.pm and C.pm. And attached is a rewritten (rather obvious) patch to lib/Inline/C/ParseRegExp.pm that should make patching C.pm altogether unnecessary. Further suggestions for improvem

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-09 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "David Mertens" Parse::RecDescent is surprisingly powerful and a lot of fun, but I've read that it does not perform well on large matches. I'm pretty sure that adding support for (void) would be easier to accomplish with P::RD, but from a dependency standp

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-09 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Andrew DeFaria" Oh Inline::C worked fine. It's just when they compiled it with their gcc it would spit out an error or warning and they'd get dinged. I suspect that if they hadn't been hit by compile-time errors then they would've been hit by the same r

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-09 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 02/08/2012 06:32 PM, Sisyphus wrote: - Original Message - From: "Andrew DeFaria" It's not me that wants it - was my former client. They had a requirement to use (void) parms (I don't know why - it was my understanding that () parms issue only a warning but they claimed their compi

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-08 Thread David Mertens
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Sisyphus wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "Andrew DeFaria" > > It's not me that wants it - was my former client. They had a requirement >> to use (void) parms (I don't know why - it was my understanding that () >> parms issue only a warning but they c

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-08 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Andrew DeFaria" It's not me that wants it - was my former client. They had a requirement to use (void) parms (I don't know why - it was my understanding that () parms issue only a warning but they claimed their compiler treated it as an error - maybe it w

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-08 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 02/07/2012 09:30 AM, David Oswald wrote: On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: Any chance we can get Parse::RecDescent to handle (void) parms? Is that request in reference to Inline::CPP? No, Inline::C. -- Andrew DeFaria Do cemetery workers prefer the g

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-08 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 02/07/2012 06:09 PM, Sisyphus wrote: - Original Message - From: "Andrew DeFaria" Any chance we can get Parse::RecDescent to handle (void) parms? It's not often in perl that we see a request for something that does nothing other than accommodate *extra* keystrokes ;-) (Not only th

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-07 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Andrew DeFaria" Any chance we can get Parse::RecDescent to handle (void) parms? It's not often in perl that we see a request for something that does nothing other than accommodate *extra* keystrokes ;-) (Not only that, but it would make perl more C'ish .

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-07 Thread David Oswald
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Any chance we can get Parse::RecDescent to handle (void) parms? Is that request in reference to Inline::CPP? Would you consider this a reasonable test? use Test::More; use Test::Exception; use Inline CPP => 'DATA'; TODO: { local $TO

Re: Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-07 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 02/06/2012 06:46 PM, Sisyphus wrote: Hi, Main change (as I mentioned a few days back) is to accommodate those perl installations that have Inline and Parse::RecDescent installed in different PERL5LIB locations. There's no tests written for this in the test suite - the proof will be that I

Inline-0.50 released to CPAN

2012-02-06 Thread Sisyphus
Hi, Main change (as I mentioned a few days back) is to accommodate those perl installations that have Inline and Parse::RecDescent installed in different PERL5LIB locations. There's no tests written for this in the test suite - the proof will be that Inline::CPP now (hopefully) starts passing