On 02/14/12 10:54, Parvin, Richard wrote:
I have been installing various versions of Solaris since 1996. I thought
I would load OpenSolaris 10.0 and give it a try. I install the full
package with OEM support and started to learn the OS. When I got to the
section on getting upgrades I found that t
Greetings,
As of changeset 2456 in the pkg(5) gate, pkgsend(1) now only documents
support for the 'generate' and 'publish' subcommands, and the 'publish'
subcommand defaults to --fmri-in-manifest and no longer accepts an FMRI
argument.
On 06/03/11 18:59, Jens Elkner wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 06/02/11 20:39, Jens Elkner wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:59:08PM -0700, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 05/27/11 12:15, Jens Elkner wrote:
...
However, at least for native, not running zones I
On 06/02/11 20:39, Jens Elkner wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:59:08PM -0700, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 05/27/11 12:15, Jens Elkner wrote:
...
However, at least for native, not running zones I can't see any reason,
why one should not use -R. IIRC in contrast to pkgadd IPS is not running
an
On 05/27/11 12:15, Jens Elkner wrote:
...
However, at least for native, not running zones I can't see any reason,
why one should not use -R. IIRC in contrast to pkgadd IPS is not running
any pre/post install scripts anymore. So it basically comes down to a
But it does allow packages to restart,
Greetings,
As of changeset 2382 / b91a97e46434 in the pkg(5) gate, recursive
uninstall is no longer supported.
What changed?
The -r option for pkg(1) uninstall has been rem
On 05/25/11 03:37 PM, Jens Elkner wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:33:35PM -0700, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 05/25/11 12:14 PM, Jens Elkner wrote:
...
...
It may contact that server, but you haven't verified the total amount or
type of traffic that is going to the server.
If you really
On 05/25/11 12:14 PM, Jens Elkner wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 09:07:37AM -0700, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 05/25/11 08:11 AM, Jens Elkner wrote:
Hi,
started to test zone installs on S11X (i.e. IPS pkgs).
I noticed, that it install a pretty minimal set of packages - nice
(since we have no
On 05/25/11 08:11 AM, Jens Elkner wrote:
Hi,
started to test zone installs on S11X (i.e. IPS pkgs).
I noticed, that it install a pretty minimal set of packages - nice
(since we have no sparse zones anymore :()!!!
However, some often needed packages (e.g. gnu-sed, sendmail, tcsh,
ipfilter, java/
Greetings,
As of changeset 2352 in the pkg(5) gate, the client now allows
publishers to be configured for use with repositories that contain
different sets of package data.
==
What changed?
===
Greetings,
With the putback of changeset 2268:1f313c3e7cdf to the pkg(5) gate,
publication tools such as pkgsend, pkgrecv, and pkgsign now always
require that a destination repository be specified for operations that
require it using environment variables or options to the program.
What chan
On 03/ 8/11 07:45 AM, William Schumann wrote:
I'm running into a problem with packages left from the old contrib IPS
repository. I can't update the image (pkg image-update) due to conflicts
between contrib packages and current packages (e.g., different protection on
the same directory), and I
Greetings,
With the putback of changeset 2219 to the pkg(5) gate, pkg(1) supports
the use of temporary package sources and package archives, and
pkgrecv(1) supports the creation of package archives.
Support for temporary package sources enables users to perform
operations such as install and
Greetings,
With the putback of changeset 2158:5a688b5b92a3 to the pkg(5) gate, the
behaviour of how pkg(5) clients look for images has been changed.
What changed?
Previousl
On 11/16/10 08:34 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Greetings,
As of changeset 2144 / 2ac203b826abd73edede95d2a5a75be0ed48dc10 in the
pkg(5) gate, the on-disk format for pkg(5) images has changed.
As an addendum:
Be aware that any custom data you have stored in /var/pkg will be lost
when the client&#
Greetings,
As of changeset 2144 / 2ac203b826abd73edede95d2a5a75be0ed48dc10 in the
pkg(5) gate, the on-disk format for pkg(5) images has changed.
What changed?
The client no
On 11/16/10 01:15 PM, Antonio Orvieto wrote:
it doesn't found the command
anto...@opensolaris:~$ cd Downloads
anto...@opensolaris:~/Downloads$ pfexec xampp-solaris-0.9.sh
xampp-solaris-0.9.sh: Command not found
i've controlled the name of the file. it is this
First verify the file exists whe
On 11/16/10 12:58 PM, Antonio Orvieto wrote:
error anyway! :(.
[b]anto...@opensolaris:~$ cd Downloads
anto...@opensolaris:~/Downloads$ sudo xampp-solaris-0.9.sh
We trust you have received the usual lecture from the local System
Administrator. It usually boils down to these three things:
#
Greetings,
As of changeset 2089 in the pkg(5) gate, the client now allows
downgrading specific packages.
==
What changed?
==
The 'image-update' subcommand was
On 09/ 8/10 02:42 PM, William Bauer wrote:
I posted this in the help forum as well.
I've tried and failed to upgrade from 2009.06 to 134 and have tested on a few
systems, including two fresh installs on VB. The repositories are there and the
downloads complete. The error is a python error duri
On 09/ 1/10 06:10 AM, manish.kuma...@emulex.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade an snv_142 system via repo.redist. Steps…
1. I start the server daemon (either on AI or on the target system).
pkg.depot –d /repo.redist –p
2. Set publisher on the client.
pkg set-publisher –P –g on-nightly
Greetings,
As of changeset 2028 / b2c674e6ee28ccfcdd32664527100f3e5d29305a in the
pkg(5) gate, the on-disk format for pkg(5) package repositories has been
formalised. (See doc/on-disk-format.txt for format details.)
What changed?
=
On 07/13/10 02:02 PM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:53 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:46 PM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:29 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:22 PM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:12 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:08 PM, Robert
On 07/13/10 01:46 PM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:29 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:22 PM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:12 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:08 PM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade a system (b132) to (b134) and it's faili
On 07/13/10 01:22 PM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:12 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/13/10 01:08 PM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade a system (b132) to (b134) and it's failing because
it thinks /var/squid is a readonly file system.
bastion:/home/bear> pfe
On 07/13/10 01:08 PM, Robert Hartzell wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade a system (b132) to (b134) and it's failing because
it thinks /var/squid is a readonly file system.
bastion:/home/bear> pfexec pkg image-update --be-name snv_134
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
Completed 1479/1479 12367/12367 297.
Greetings,
With the putback of changeset 1968 to the pkg(5) gate, pkg.depotd(1M)
now fully supports SMF and file-based configuration, and a new utility
has been added for creating and managing package repositories.
What changed?
=
pkg.depotd(1M) now natively supports configuration
On 06/17/10 10:12 AM, Kyle McDonald wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/17/2010 11:13 AM, Mary Ding wrote:
Kyle:
The reason why your AI install does not work and boot is as follow.:
You are using b134 but you are installing from
installation will be performed from
h
On 06/16/10 09:53 AM, Kyle McDonald wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/16/2010 12:13 PM, Kyle McDonald wrote:
I'm re-trying the text install now.
Here's the logs form the latest text installer attempt.
The failure seems to be different in this one:
...
current task
On 06/ 1/10 10:11 PM, solarg wrote:
hello all,
on a Sun X4150, i have os2009.06 (b111b) installed. Yesterday, i startrd
an image-update to b134 (dev repo), and it is not finished after 10 hours!
Install Phase 162016/162016
Update Phase
On 05/28/10 05:32 PM, Alok Aggarwal wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Fri, 28 May 2010, Robert Thurlow wrote:
My internal machine had a fresh netinstall to nv_139 yesterday.
I'm working on code with new files, added to:
usr/src/pkg/manifests/service-file-system-nfs.mf
The repo somewhat more modern than onnv
On 05/17/10 05:24 PM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
On 17/05/2010 18:21, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 05/17/10 05:13 PM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
Is OpenSolaris installed on the primary partition? I think it's a
requirement presently.
No, it isn't.
Cheers,
-Shawn
It used to be then. If so, this
On 05/17/10 05:13 PM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
Is OpenSolaris installed on the primary partition? I think it's a requirement
presently.
No, it isn't.
Cheers,
-Shawn
___
install-discuss mailing list
install-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris
On 05/16/10 10:18 AM, Will Fiveash wrote:
On a virtual box running OpenSolaris snv_134 I reset the publisher to
the internal dev repo and tried to create a new BE based on snv_139.
The first time I tried the image-update almost completed (The Update
Phase was done) but the whole system froze up a
Greetings,
With the putback of changeset 1895 to the pkg(5) gate, pkg(1) now
supports filesystem-based repository access.
What changed?
=
There are no user-visible changes to command syntax or client operation.
The only noticeable change is that any command that accepted a
repos
On 05/11/10 08:50 AM, Duncan Groenewald wrote:
Hi, I just tried to run an update which failed. See below for error - I did
post a bug for this but figured someone here might know if there is a
workaround in the meantime.
...
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/tmp/tmps1GtUF/etc/
On 05/ 3/10 11:25 AM, Eiwe Lingefors wrote:
I understand this concept. I should rephrase my question and I apologize for
not being more clear. Is there a way to create the metadata so that I end up
with a self contained dev repository clone?
The desired end result is to have an independent clo
On 05/ 3/10 11:04 AM, Eiwe Lingefors wrote:
Could you describe this process in more detail? I'm having some trouble setting
up a repository clone. I've mirrored pkg.opensolaris.org/dev using the
recommended rsync process.
The pkg server is running but I'm still not seeing any packages indexed.
On 04/26/10 01:58 AM, Griffin wrote:
Hi all.
After installation of OSol I have encounter some problem with installation
additional packages to system. Computer, on which OSol installed don't have
connection to internet, and by some reasons is no way to connect it in.
With Arch Linux distro I so
On 04/18/10 09:58 AM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
On 18/04/2010 10:52, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 04/18/10 09:49 AM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
I tried to install desktop/administration/gparted package on SunBlade
2500 running OpenSolaris snv_134, but pkg produced a following error:
No matching version of
On 04/18/10 09:49 AM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
I tried to install desktop/administration/gparted package on SunBlade 2500
running OpenSolaris snv_134, but pkg produced a following error:
No matching version of desktop/administration/gparted can be installed:
pkg://opensolaris.org/desktop/administra
On 04/15/10 10:24 PM, UnixRob wrote:
Thank you Brock Pytlik and Shawn Walker for your help and advice.
I actually did run this command as the root user: pkg install -v SUNWipkg
before I attempted to do the the pkg image-update. Note that before I
did the "pkg install -v SUNWipkg"
On 04/15/10 11:13 PM, UnixRob wrote:
Another thing I'd also like to ask the community about is what the
"State" and "UFIX" columns mean in this output that I get for the "pkg
list -av SUNWipkg" command:
$ pkg list -av SUNWipkg
FMRI
STATE UFIX
pkg:/sunwi...@0.5.11,5.11-0.111:20100301T222005Z
On 04/ 8/10 05:37 PM, UnixRob wrote:
Sorry to bother you guys. I'm having problems using the "support"
repository to do a pkg image-update from OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101b to
OpenSolaris 2009.06 using a Toshiba Tecra M10 laptop that came with
OpenSolaris pre-installed. I also have ZFS compressio
On 04/10/10 05:01 AM, Andrew Watkins wrote:
Solved it. Just need to clear my head and go home and then it worked...
Anyway the correct solution for future reference:
# mkdir /export/pkg
# cd /export/pkg
# pkgsend -s file:///export/pkg create-repository --set-property
publisher.prefix=foo
Actu
On 04/ 9/10 05:12 PM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
Then you can't install dhcp/dhcpmgr -- it won't run without Java.
Well, I could certainly install Java, but when and how would I do this exactly?
What's the reason behind not simply configuring the additional opensolaris.org
publisher and its repos
On 04/ 9/10 12:49 PM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 04/ 9/10 11:14 AM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
What's the output of "pkg version" ?
38fe0f4bd5ca
I this version of the pkg tools by following the flag day mail and downloading
On 04/ 9/10 09:39 AM, Andrew Watkins wrote:
I have been trying to create a complete local mirror repository of
pkg.opensolaris.org/dev, but all the documentation I have found does not
seem to work with the latest releases.
Example taken from:
http://blogs.sun.com/middle/entry/establishing_reduc
On 04/ 1/10 06:32 PM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
Is there a way to update a single package from IPS without updating the whole
image and without new BE creation? For example, recently a new version of
VirtualBox came out, and update is available for extra repository. But
attempting to update it from
On 03/29/10 01:51 PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
Robin Axelsson wrote:
I did quite exactly that but in the normal boot environment, but since
you insisted that I should do all this in maintenance mode I ran 'beadm
destroy', added '-s', booted the original image in maintenance
mode and executed exactly
On 03/29/10 10:17 AM, Liane Praza wrote:
On 03/28/10 08:36 PM, Richard Lowe wrote:
Alan Steinberg wrote:
The package name that is being used comes from the automated installer
manifest file. I was also wondering why these have not switched to the
renamed packages. I would love to just try swapp
On 03/28/10 10:19 PM, Alan Steinberg wrote:
Thanks Shawn and Rich.
The dependency that Shawn questioned in his email is as it was received
from the ON repository for the sendmail package:
depend
fmri=pkg:/library/security/open...@0.9.8.12,5.11-0.134:20100302T041209Z
type=require
The version we
On 03/28/10 10:13 PM, Richard Lowe wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 03/28/10 09:50 PM, Alan Steinberg wrote:
It's the same error that the AI log shows. See attached.
I'd ask what "pkg install -nv service/network/smtp/sendmail" says, but
looking at the manifest for it, the
On 03/28/10 09:50 PM, Alan Steinberg wrote:
It's the same error that the AI log shows. See attached.
I'd ask what "pkg install -nv service/network/smtp/sendmail" says, but
looking at the manifest for it, the problem seems clear:
service%2Fnetwork%2Fsmtp%2Fsendmail%408.14.4%2C5.11-0.136%3A201
On 03/28/10 08:24 PM, Alan Steinberg wrote:
When trying to build the AI for build 136, I now it this failure:
exec command: /usr/bin/pkg -R /export/home/dc/build_data/pkg_image
install --no-index SUNWsndm
Planning for install failed:
Use -v option for more details
pkg: No matching version of SU
On 03/28/10 07:48 PM, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
"zpool list -o version" would tell you the zfs versions of the current
pools.
However, zfs version 17 wasn't integrated until build 120, and
OpenSolaris 2009.06 is based on build 111b which has zfs version 14 I
believe.
Ah, thanks, so can I just u
On 03/28/10 07:32 PM, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
I have OpenSolaris 2009.06 installed and my main boot drive is connected to a
Syba card and all is well.
I have a 3ware 9500S-8 RAID card with 8 drives attached to it. The Device
manager says that the card is present, but the driver is missin
57 matches
Mail list logo
