And being pedantic...
On 31/05/2016 06:12, Joe Touch wrote:
>
>
> On 5/29/2016 4:23 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
I.e., you MUST support source fragmentation at the ingress at the outer
IPv6 layer (because UDP doesn't have support for fragmentation and
reassembly). If you make this
On 5/29/2016 4:23 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
>> > I.e., you MUST support source fragmentation at the ingress at the outer
>> > IPv6 layer (because UDP doesn't have support for fragmentation and
>> > reassembly). If you make this requirement, you can handle IPv6 over the
>> > tunnel.
> Yeah I don't
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@herbertland.com]
>> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:06 PM
>> To: Xuxiaohu
>> Cc: int-area@ietf.org; Softwires WG; n...@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org;
>>
Xiaohu,
Please see inline.
On May 30, 2016, at 6:09 AM, Xuxiaohu
> wrote:
Carlos
From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro
(cpignata)
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:34 PM
To: Wassim Haddad
Cc:
Carlos
From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro
(cpignata)
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:34 PM
To: Wassim Haddad
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03
Wasim, Juan Carlos,
Back to your original