Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03

2016-05-30 Thread Brian E Carpenter
And being pedantic... On 31/05/2016 06:12, Joe Touch wrote: > > > On 5/29/2016 4:23 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: I.e., you MUST support source fragmentation at the ingress at the outer IPv6 layer (because UDP doesn't have support for fragmentation and reassembly). If you make this

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03

2016-05-30 Thread Joe Touch
On 5/29/2016 4:23 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: >> > I.e., you MUST support source fragmentation at the ingress at the outer >> > IPv6 layer (because UDP doesn't have support for fragmentation and >> > reassembly). If you make this requirement, you can handle IPv6 over the >> > tunnel. > Yeah I don't

Re: [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.

2016-05-30 Thread Tom Herbert
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote: > Hi Tom, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@herbertland.com] >> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:06 PM >> To: Xuxiaohu >> Cc: int-area@ietf.org; Softwires WG; n...@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org; >>

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03

2016-05-30 Thread Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
Xiaohu, Please see inline. On May 30, 2016, at 6:09 AM, Xuxiaohu > wrote: Carlos From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:34 PM To: Wassim Haddad Cc:

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03

2016-05-30 Thread Xuxiaohu
Carlos From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:34 PM To: Wassim Haddad Cc: int-area@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03 Wasim, Juan Carlos, Back to your original