Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:56:26PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/edid-decode > > I try to keep that reasonably up to date, though it's lagging a little. > Do let me know if you have patches for it. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to explain where m

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread Lucas
Okay, So I used xrandr to add my modeline but X just shows half a screen and then restarts. When I use CVT to create Modelines they all fail. The modeline from my xorg.conf file works perfectly on an NVidia machine, what would the difference be? Lucas __

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/29] drm/i915: Invert watermarks used for i8xx, i9xx.

2010-08-30 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:05:45 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > The calculation seem backwards as they compute the number of entries > that would be drained during a memory fetch, and but return the opposite > value. > > This fixes a common flicker [or even completely scrambled display] on > high reso

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/29] drm/i915/dp: Really try 5 times before giving up.

2010-08-30 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:05:41 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Only stop trying if the aux channel sucessfully reports that the > transmission was completed, otherwise try again. On the 5th failure, > bail and report that something is amiss. > > This fixes a sporadic failure in reading the EDID for m

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Allocate the PCI resource for the MCHBAR

2010-08-30 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:58:12 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > We were failing when trying to allocate the resource for MMIO of the > MCHBAR because we forgot to specify what type of resource we wanted. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > Cc: Jesse Barnes Applied. Thanks! Failure here seems a litt

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: overlay on gen2 can't address above 1G

2010-08-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
So set the coherent dma mask accordingly. This dma mask is only used for physical objects, so it won't really matter allocation-wise. Now this never really surfaced because sane 32bit kernels only have 1G of lowmem. But some eager testers (distros?) still carry around the patch to adjust lowmem vi

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 18:47 +, The Fungi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:19:23PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > Pretty sure parse-edid doesn't understand CEA extension blocks. The > > kernel does though. > > Aha--that probably explains it. Are there any userspace alternatives > to parse-e

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:19:23PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > Pretty sure parse-edid doesn't understand CEA extension blocks. The > kernel does though. Aha--that probably explains it. Are there any userspace alternatives to parse-edid which implement this? If not, I'll look at coming up with a

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 17:14 +, The Fungi wrote: > At some point all that ceased to be necessary for me, and the driver > now figures out that it should use ATSC 720p timings with my HDTV > even though it returns what appears to be an entirely malformed EDID > block (I'm just booting with video

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:44:49PM +, Nasa wrote: > The only possible solution is to try and use xrandr to change the > resolution after X is started. Use a combination of CVT (to create > modelines) and xrandr to to change the resolutions. I used to have to do the same, and had this at the to

Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.36-rc2 regression: Wrong screen resolution (1024x768 instead of 1680x1050)

2010-08-30 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 15:19:20 +0200, Maciej Rutecki wrote: > > TV1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > > 0mm x 0mm > >848x48030.0 + > >640x48030.0 + > >1024x768 30.0* > >800x60030.0 > > > > This is a Mac mini Core 2 D

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread Lucas Burdick
Thanks Guys! I'll let you know how I make out with these suggestions when I get home. Lucas -Original Message- From: intel-gfx-bounces+lucas=dmglobal@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces+lucas=dmglobal@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Felix Miata Sent: Monday, Aug

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/08/30 16:44 (GMT) Nasa composed: > I tried to find out the same info -- with no success. The only possible > solution is to try and use xrandr to change the resolution after X is > started. Use a combination of CVT (to create modelines) and xrandr to > to change the resolutions. Did yo

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread Nasa
- "Lucas" wrote: > Hi All, > >   > > Pardon me if this has been discussed before but I sure as heck can’t > find the answer.  Perhaps my googling skills aren’t good enough. > >   > > Anyway, I have an AOpen DE 965-HG mini PC that has – surprise! – Intel > 965 graphics.  It has an HDMI-ou

[Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread Lucas
Hi All, Pardon me if this has been discussed before but I sure as heck can't find the answer. Perhaps my googling skills aren't good enough. Anyway, I have an AOpen DE 965-HG mini PC that has - surprise! - Intel 965 graphics. It has an HDMI-out port which I have connected to my 42" plasma

Re: [Intel-gfx] No VBT in OpRegion / Switching MBP Arrandale

2010-08-30 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:19 +0200, Andreas Heider wrote: > Hello everyone, > at the moment i'm trying to get vga_switcheroo working on a 2010 > macbook pro. This laptop has two graphics cards, a dedicated nvidia > one and an integrated intel arrandale chip. Switching is still pretty > rough but it

[Intel-gfx] [BUG] LVDS using single instead of dual channel mode

2010-08-30 Thread Andreas Heider
Hi, after a lot of debugging i found the cause of the distortion described in my earlier mail ([Intel-gfx] No VBT in OpRegion / Switching MBP Arrandale): In intel_display.c, static const intel_limit_t *intel_ironlake_limit(struct drm_crtc *crtc) it didn't detect that the panel needed dual chann