Re: [Intel-gfx] Interrupt latency on some 945GM platforms

2010-09-27 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On 27 of September 2010 03:46:23 Shaohua Li wrote: does disable msi help with 'pci=nomsi'? Doesn't help on my system :( ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] glx: Fix use after free in DrawableGone

2010-09-27 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
2010/9/23 Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net: 2010/9/23 Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com: That seems off to me.  This is doing more than changing the c-next dereference.  You're now freeing it where you weren't before. Previously, you freed it inside: if (c-isCurrent (c-drawPriv ==

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-27 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 01:11:02AM +, Nasa wrote: Looking at your info it looks like your hsync is 30.3 (am I reading that right?), which is lower than the default set by the driver -- which is 31. I know this because I tried a host of modelines in the monitor section (a file in

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix GMCH power reporting

2010-09-27 Thread Jesse Barnes
The IPS driver needs to know the current power consumption of the GMCH in order to make decisions about when to increase or decrease the CPU and/or GPU power envelope. So fix up the divisions to save the results so the numbers are actually correct (contrary to some earlier comments and code,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix GMCH power reporting

2010-09-27 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:35:44 -0700, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote: The IPS driver needs to know the current power consumption of the GMCH in order to make decisions about when to increase or decrease the CPU and/or GPU power envelope. So fix up the divisions to save the results

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] CHROMIUM: i915: Added default LVDS options for the no-VBT case

2010-09-27 Thread Simon Que
Hello, I've updated my patch for default LVDS options, based on feedback from Chris Wilson. Updates that I've made: - Removed Kconfig option that enables dither bit being set -- because we can assume that we want dither enabled for all architectures anyway. No need to have an option to turn it

Re: [Intel-gfx] Interrupt latency on some 945GM platforms

2010-09-27 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On 26 of September 2010 13:53:35 Stefan Biereigel wrote: Hello Everyone, just to add on to reports of this problem, there was a Thread here in LKML some months ago targeting the same problem (but not really attacking it at the Chipset driver). As I have one of those Laptops with a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] CHROMIUM: i915: Added default LVDS options for the no-VBT case

2010-09-27 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:06:17 -0700, Simon Que s...@chromium.org wrote: Hello, I've updated my patch for default LVDS options, based on feedback from Chris Wilson. Updates that I've made: - Removed Kconfig option that enables dither bit being set -- because we can assume that we want dither

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-27 Thread Nasa
- The Fungi fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 01:11:02AM +, Nasa wrote: Looking at your info it looks like your hsync is 30.3 (am I reading that right?), which is lower than the default set by the driver -- which is 31. I know this because I tried a host of