Ping. Daniel or Chris, can one of you clarify this request? Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:05:27AM -0800, Volkin, Bradley D wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 03:07:15AM -0800, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:12:06AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
No need for the old test case once the new one was added.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
---
tests/.gitignore | 1 -
tests/Makefile.sources | 1 -
tests/gem_vmap_blits.c | 344 -
3 files changed, 346 deletions(-)
de
On 01/30/2014 11:06 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:25:51PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
So originally I've thought we need this due to the massive overhead o
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
In preparation for userptr test we move the eviction logic
into a common file so it can be used from both test cases.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
---
tests/eviction_common.c | 235 +++
tests/gem_evict_everything.c | 210 ++
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
A set of userptr test cases to support the new feature.
For the eviction and swapping stress testing I have extracted
some common behaviour from gem_evict_everything and made both
test cases use it to avoid duplicating the code.
Both unsynchronized and synchronized userptr
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Make sure selection loop does not generate duplicates
when it picks a subset of objects for a single exec buffer.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
---
tests/eviction_common.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/eviction_common.c b/tests/eviction_c
Bspec and the code suggests that the interrupt signaled by IIR[7,5]
(DISPLAY_PIPE_A/B_VBLANK) is a first level IRQ flag for the second
level PIPEA/BSTAT[2] (Start of Vertical Blank) interrupt. Measuring
the relative timings of when IIR[7] and PIPEASTAT[1,2] get set and
checking the effect of unmask
On 01/29/2014 08:34 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Actually I've found something else to complain about:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
+#define I915_USERPTR_READ_ONLY 0x1
This smells like an insta-root-exploit:
1. mmap /lib/ld-linux.so as read-only
2. userptr bind that mmap
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
This patch series replaces the old vmap with the new userptr test case.
Some refactoring precedes the actual introduction to pull out code
from gem_evict_everything which is useful for both.
Test case at the moment tests dmabuf sharing of userptr objects which
is not curren
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 12:40:46AM +0530, sagar.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Sagar Kamble
>
> Primary planes support 180 degree rotation. Expose the feature
> through rotation drm property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Kamble
> Tested-by: Sagar Kamble
> ---
> dr
10 matches
Mail list logo