On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 08:28:55PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 08:26:15AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 07:20:38AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gp
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 08:26:15AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 07:20:38AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > index 86362de..6e5250d 100644
> > > --- a/dr
Hello Daniel,
just to close my request:
The latest git pull from Linus' tree fixed my issue.
vmlinuz-3.16.0-rc2-00211-gd7933ab (26.6. 21:19) was bad
vmlinuz-3.16.0-rc2-00319-g3e7b256 (28.6. 09:23) works again
There are two pulls with 'drm-fixes' and 'x86/urgent' in this area.
Don't know what it
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 07:20:38AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:21:20PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[1]rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> >
> >On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Ben Widawsky
> ><[2]benjamin.widaw...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Scot Doyle wrote:
> commit c675949ec58ca50d5a3ae3c757892f1560f6e896
> drm/i915: do not setup backlight if not available according to VBT
>
> caused a regression on machines with a misconfigured VBT. Add a quirk to
> assert the presence of a controllable backlight, overri
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Scot Doyle wrote:
> Add a quirk to assert the presence of a controllable backlight. Use it to
> ignore the VBT backlight presence check during backlight setup.
>
> Tested-by: James Duley
> Signed-off-by: Scot Doyle
> CC: Jani Nikula
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i91
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Scot Doyle wrote:
> The Dell 11 Chromebook laptop has a controllable backlight although its
> VBT reports otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scot Doyle
> CC: Jani Nikula
Tested-bys on patches 3-4 would be awesome.
BR,
Jani.
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dis
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:27:40 +0300
> Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> Historically we've exposed the full backlight PWM duty cycle range to
>> the userspace, in the name of "mechanism, not policy". However, it turns
>> out there are both panels and board designs
>> There seems to be a regression in the upcoming Linux 3.16-rc2 release
>> candidate that I bisected down to this first bad commit:
>> [dbb42748ac4929987c1449ecb296b39ef8956b62] drm/i915: Move the C3 LP
>> write bit setup to gen3_init_clock_gating() for KMS.
>
> Can you attach the dmesg with rc2 a
