With LLVM v3.4.2 I got this error reported:
...
intel_driver.c:1182:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'intel_sync_close' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
intel_sync_close(screen);
^
In file included from intel_uxa.c:44:
./intel_glamor.h:92:1: war
Chris Wilson writes:
> commit d21d781466785c317131a8a57606925867265dc8
> Author: Daniel Vetter
> Date: Tue Feb 22 18:31:44 2011 +0100
>
> Fix relaxed tiling on gen2
This one matches libdrm in using 16 for the tile height alignment on
gen2.
> Try enabling relaxed fencing again.
> No. The
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Building intel-ddx from GIT HEAD breaks here with LLVM v3.4.2 like this...
> ...
> intel_driver.c:1182:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'intel_sync_close' is invalid in C99
> [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> intel
Building intel-ddx from GIT HEAD breaks here with LLVM v3.4.2 like this...
...
intel_driver.c:1182:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'intel_sync_close' is invalid in C99
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
intel_sync_close(screen);
^
In file included from intel_uxa.c:
The current drm-next misses Ville's original Patch 14/19, the one i
first objected, then objected to my objection. It is needed to avoid
actual regressions. Attached a trivially rebased (v2) of Ville's patch
to go on top of drm-next, also as tgz in case my e-mail client mangles
the patch again,
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 08:53:35PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> IVB introduced the CUR_FBC_CTL register which allows reducing the cursor
> height down to 8 lines from the otherwise square cursor dimensions.
> Implement support for it.
>
> Commandeer the o
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 08:53:34PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Only write CURBASE when something about the cursor changed. Also
> eliminate the unnecessary posting read after writing CURCNTR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i91
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 08:53:33PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> It seems cleaner if we keep CURCNTR at 0 when the cursor is disabled,
> so don't set the CURSOR_PIPE_CSC_ENABLE bit unless the cursor is
> enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
Reviewed-
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 08:53:32PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> To make the code a bit more undestandable move the
> intel_crtc->cursor_base assignment into the low level update cursor
> routines. That's were we compare the current value with the new one
>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:53:30PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Chris Wilson writes:
>
> > That extra alignment is due to gen2 and early gen3 (if
> > (!intel->has_relaxed_fencing) covers them).
>
> Here's the patch which changed the alignment requirment:
[snip commits picked at random]
This i
10 matches
Mail list logo
