Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Enable PSR by default.

2015-03-15 Thread R, Durgadoss
>-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Rodrigo Vivi >Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 6:56 AM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo >Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Enable PSR by default. > >With a r

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: PSR: deprecate link_standby support for core platforms.

2015-03-15 Thread R, Durgadoss
>-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Rodrigo Vivi >Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 6:56 AM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo >Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: PSR: deprecate link_standby suppor

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic

2015-03-15 Thread R, Durgadoss
>-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Rodrigo Vivi >Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 6:56 AM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Runyan, Arthur J; Vivi, Rodrigo >Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: PSR: Remove wrong LINK_DISABLE.

2015-03-15 Thread R, Durgadoss
>-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Rodrigo Vivi >Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 6:56 AM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo >Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: PSR: Remove wrong LINK_DISABLE. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay time before active PSR.

2015-03-15 Thread R, Durgadoss
>-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Rodrigo Vivi >Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 6:56 AM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo >Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Use the CRC gpio for panel enable/disable

2015-03-15 Thread Shobhit Kumar
The CRC (Crystal Cove) PMIC, controls the panel enable and disable signals for BYT for dsi panels. This is indicated in the VBT fields. Use that to initialize and use GPIO based control for these signals. v2: Use the newer gpiod interface(Alexandre) v3: Remove the redundant checks and unused code

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v5 9/9] drm/i915: Backlight control using CRC PMIC based PWM driver

2015-03-15 Thread Shobhit Kumar
On 03/13/2015 08:00 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:01:33PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: >> CC: Samuel Ortiz >> Cc: Linus Walleij >> Cc: Alexandre Courbot >> Cc: Thierry Reding >> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 25 +++

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v5 9/9] drm/i915: Backlight control using CRC PMIC based PWM driver

2015-03-15 Thread Shobhit Kumar
On 03/13/2015 10:50 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 04:30:43PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:01:33PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: >>> CC: Samuel Ortiz >>> Cc: Linus Walleij >>> Cc: Alexandre Courbot >>> Cc: Thierry Reding >>> Signed-off-by: Shobhit

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree

2015-03-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dave, Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c between commit 2dccc9898d45 ("drm/i915: Ensure plane->state->fb stays in sync with plane->fb") from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit afd65eb4cc05 ("drm/i915: Ensure plane->state->fb stays in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Beignet] Preventing zero GPU virtual address allocation

2015-03-15 Thread Song, Ruiling
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel > Vetter > Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:14 AM > To: Chris Wilson; Daniel Vetter; Weinehall, David; Zou, Nanhai; Song, Ruiling; > Vetter, Daniel; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Yang, Rong R

Re: [Intel-gfx] commit 440fd52 drm/mm: Support 4GiB and larger ranges oops on 32bit kernel

2015-03-15 Thread Dave Airlie
On 16 March 2015 at 05:31, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 08:22:36PM +0100, Krzysztof Kolasa wrote: >> Problem solved and tested: >> >> [PATCH] drm/mm: Fix support 4 GiB and larger ranges >> >> bad argument if(tmp)... in check_free_hole >> >> fix oops: kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/

Re: [Intel-gfx] commit 440fd52 drm/mm: Support 4GiB and larger ranges oops on 32bit kernel

2015-03-15 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 08:22:36PM +0100, Krzysztof Kolasa wrote: > Problem solved and tested: > > [PATCH] drm/mm: Fix support 4 GiB and larger ranges > > bad argument if(tmp)... in check_free_hole > > fix oops: kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c:305! > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kolasa N

Re: [Intel-gfx] commit 440fd52 drm/mm: Support 4GiB and larger ranges oops on 32bit kernel

2015-03-15 Thread Krzysztof Kolasa
Problem solved and tested: [PATCH] drm/mm: Fix support 4 GiB and larger ranges bad argument if(tmp)... in check_free_hole fix oops: kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c:305! Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kolasa --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) d