Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915: Mechanism to forward clock monotonic time in perf samples

On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 01:19 +0530, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:04:04PM +0530, sourab.gu...@intel.com wrote: > > +static u64 get_current_gpu_ts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > +{ > > + return ((u64)I915_READ(GT_TIMESTAMP_COUNT_UDW) << 32) | > > +

[Intel-gfx] [Regression report] Weekly regression report WW19

WW19 Regression report. There was no new regressions last week. Previous Regressions +---+---+++ | BugId | Summary | Created on | Bisect |

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-misc

Hi Dave, Refcounting is hard, so here's a quick pull request with the one-liner to fix up i915. Otherwise just a few other small things I picked up. Plus the regression fix from Marten for rmfb behaviour that lingered around forever since no testers. Feel free to cherry-pick that over to

[Intel-gfx] Updated drm-intel-testing

Hi all, New -testing cycle with cool stuff: - refactor stolen quirks to share code between early quirks and i915 (Joonas) - refactor gem BO/vma funcstion (Tvrtko) - backlight over DPCD support (Yetunde Abedisi) - more dsi panel sequence support (Jani) - lots of refactoring around handling iomaps,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add Backlight Control using DPCD for eDP connectors (v9)

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:25:18PM +0100, Yetunde Adebisi wrote: > This patch adds support for eDP backlight control using DPCD registers to > backlight hooks in intel_panel. > > It checks for backlight control over AUX channel capability and sets up > function pointers to get and set the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-enable GGTT earlier during resume on pre-gen6 platforms

On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:18:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:35:55PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > > wrote: > > > @@ -730,9 +730,14 @@ int i915_suspend_switcheroo(struct drm_device *dev, > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW"

On May 08 Stefan Richter wrote: > On May 06 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:45:31PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > [...] > > > Subtest fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-fullscreen: FAIL (5.876s) > > > > This one failed in both runs. Can you please retest with just that using > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW"

On May 06 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:45:31PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: [...] > > Subtest fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-fullscreen: FAIL (5.876s) > > This one failed in both runs. Can you please retest with just that using > > # kms_frontbuffer_tracking --run-subtest

Re: [Intel-gfx] Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW"

On May 08 Stefan Richter wrote: > On May 05 Zanoni, Paulo R wrote: > > If you don't want to keep carrying a manual revert, you can just boot > > with i915.enable_fbc=0 for now (or write a /etc/modprobe.d file). Also, > > it would be good to know in case you still somehow see the machine > > hangs

Re: [Intel-gfx] Regression of v4.6-rc vs. v4.5 bisected: a98ee79317b4 "drm/i915/fbc: enable FBC by default on HSW and BDW"

On May 05 Zanoni, Paulo R wrote: > If you don't want to keep carrying a manual revert, you can just boot > with i915.enable_fbc=0 for now (or write a /etc/modprobe.d file). Also, > it would be good to know in case you still somehow see the machine > hangs even with FBC disabled. As expected,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-enable GGTT earlier during resume on pre-gen6 platforms

On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:35:55PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > @@ -730,9 +730,14 @@ int i915_suspend_switcheroo(struct drm_device *dev, > > pm_message_t state) > > static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/16] Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks

Hi Matt, On 22 April 2016 at 00:16, Matt Roper wrote: > For a detailed explanation of this series, please see the original cover > letter: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-April/091293.html > > This spin just incorporates the final review