Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t RFC] tests: Add explicit test lists for CI use.

2016-10-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:51:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:31:32AM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote: > > See tests/intel-ci/README for rationale and explanation. > > A lot of those tests are garbage and not future proof making them > useless for regression testing.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: KBL - Recommended buffer translation programming for DisplayPort

2016-10-06 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 06 Oct 2016, "Vivi, Rodrigo" wrote: > On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 10:05 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016, "Vivi, Rodrigo" wrote: >> > On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 13:50 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Rodrigo Vivi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Save hangcheck score across resets

2016-10-06 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:00:09AM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Hangcheck score has been zeroed on engine init, which happens > after reset recovery. This has worked well as we always reset > all engines on hang, and also discarded all work submitted > to engines. > > With commit 821ed7df6e2a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Distinguish last emitted request from last submitted request

2016-10-06 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:57:29AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ke, 2016-10-05 at 21:05 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > In order not to trigger hangcheck on a idle-but-waiting engine, we need > > to distinguish between the pending request queue and the actual > > execution queue. This is done

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/22] drm/i915: Shrink per-platform watermark configuration

2016-10-06 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On ke, 2016-10-05 at 17:53 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > On 05/10/2016 17:50, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > > > On 05/10/2016 16:07, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > > > > > On ke, 2016-10-05 at 13:33 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Distinguish last emitted request from last submitted request

2016-10-06 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On ke, 2016-10-05 at 21:05 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > In order not to trigger hangcheck on a idle-but-waiting engine, we need > to distinguish between the pending request queue and the actual > execution queue. This is done later in "drm/i915: Enable multiple > timelines" but for now we need a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915/GuC: Make GuC loads default

2016-10-06 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:20:04PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > Proper functioning of HuC requires GuC to be > loaded. Make GuC loads default so that HuC works > seemlessly. > Also, note that GuC submission is not made default > and still needs to be given as a kernel parameter. > Once the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t RFC] tests: Add explicit test lists for CI use.

2016-10-06 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:31:32AM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote: > See tests/intel-ci/README for rationale and explanation. A lot of those tests are garbage and not future proof making them useless for regression testing. Including them just adds noise and us ignoring the results. -Chris -- Chris

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t RFC] tests: Add explicit test lists for CI use.

2016-10-06 Thread Petri Latvala
See tests/intel-ci/README for rationale and explanation. Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala --- The plans for CI are to use explicit test lists in the future, as laid out in this commit. Comments, acks, nacks, flames, etc would be very welcome. The only list so far is a

<    1   2