[Intel-gfx] [drm-tip:drm-tip 7/8] debug.c:undefined reference to `save_stack_trace'

Hi Chris, It's probably a bug fix that unveils the link errors. tree: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip head: c49f62682d40bd553d906245815a73976cfb604a commit: b339ba2c91ecf03b38560c20e88d98dc7b6739f6 [7/8] Merge remote-tracking branch 'drm-intel/topic/core-for-CI' into

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling

On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 10:11 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Dhinakaran Pandiyan (2018-07-21 10:06:07) > > > > intel_tile_width_bytes() returns 128B for gen-2 y-tiled buffers > > while at > > the same time HAS_128_BYTE_Y_TILING() returns false for gen-2. I am > > assuming

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Pull unpin map into vma release

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Pull unpin map into vma release URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47011/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4522_full -> Patchwork_9743_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47003/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4522_full -> Patchwork_9742_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/dsc: Add missing _MMIO() from PPS registers (rev3)

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dsc: Add missing _MMIO() from PPS registers (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46979/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4521_full -> Patchwork_9741_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/dp: Limit link training clock recovery loop

== Series Details == Series: series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/dp: Limit link training clock recovery loop URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46992/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4521_full -> Patchwork_9740_full = == Summary - WARNING ==

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Show debugfs dpcd read failure directly

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Show debugfs dpcd read failure directly URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46977/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4521_full -> Patchwork_9737_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/dp: add extended receiver capability field present bit

== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/dp: add extended receiver capability field present bit URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46965/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4521_full -> Patchwork_9736_full = == Summary - WARNING

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Fix psr sink status report. (rev3)

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Fix psr sink status report. (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46831/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4519_full -> Patchwork_9735_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Clean up power well descriptors

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Clean up power well descriptors URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46952/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4518_full -> Patchwork_9734_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Show stack (by WARN) for hitting forcewake errors

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Show stack (by WARN) for hitting forcewake errors URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46939/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4518_full -> Patchwork_9732_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: GTT remapping for display (rev2)

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: GTT remapping for display (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46886/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4518_full -> Patchwork_9730_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Only force GGTT coherency w/a on required chipsets (rev2)

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Only force GGTT coherency w/a on required chipsets (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46915/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4518_full -> Patchwork_9729_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Pull unpin map into vma release

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Pull unpin map into vma release URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47011/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4522 -> Patchwork_9743 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External URL:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/gem_exec_schedule: Trim deep runtime

Time the runtime for emitting deep dependency tree, while keeping it full of umpteen thousand requests. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- tests/gem_exec_schedule.c | 83 +-- 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Pull unpin map into vma release

A reasonably common operation is to pin the map of the vma alongside the vma itself for the lifetime of the vma, and so release both pin at the same time as destroying the vma. It is common enough to pull into the release function, making that central function more attractive to a couple of other

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47003/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4522 -> Patchwork_9742 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External URL:

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47003/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim sparse origin/drm-tip Commit: drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/../i915_drv.h:3645:16:

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47003/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 4b57e640b38e drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling -:28: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse

Re: [Intel-gfx] Can recent i915 support more than 8192x8192 screen?

sob., 21 lip 2018, 11:20 użytkownik Marcin Owsiany napisał: > > Do you mean hardware, out Linux X? > Do you mean hardware, *or Linux/X*? Marcin > ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Intel-gfx] Can recent i915 support more than 8192x8192 screen?

sob., 21 lip 2018, 10:20 użytkownik Chris Wilson napisał: > Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2018-07-20 21:22:25) > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:31:19PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > >Hello, > > >TL;DR: how can I set a 8960x2880 screen (not display) size on a > T580? A > > >patch for i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling

Quoting Dhinakaran Pandiyan (2018-07-21 10:06:07) > intel_tile_width_bytes() returns 128B for gen-2 y-tiled buffers while at > the same time HAS_128_BYTE_Y_TILING() returns false for gen-2. I am > assuming intel_tile_width_bytes() does the right thing. > > Cc: Chris Wilson > Cc: Ville Syrjälä >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix gen-2 check for 128B tiling

intel_tile_width_bytes() returns 128B for gen-2 y-tiled buffers while at the same time HAS_128_BYTE_Y_TILING() returns false for gen-2. I am assuming intel_tile_width_bytes() does the right thing. Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND] drm/i915: Interactive RPS mode

Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2018-07-20 15:19:20) > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 03:03:09PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2018-07-20 14:50:25) > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 02:38:32PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2018-07-20 14:32:40) > > > > > Another

Re: [Intel-gfx] Can recent i915 support more than 8192x8192 screen?

Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2018-07-20 21:22:25) > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:31:19PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > >Hello, > >TL;DR: how can I set a 8960x2880 screen (not display) size on a T580? A > >patch for i915 that I found on the internets does not seem to work. > >Full story: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] Can recent i915 support more than 8192x8192 screen?

pt., 20 lip 2018, 23:35 użytkownik Rodrigo Vivi napisał: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:01:38PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > >2018-07-20 22:22 GMT+02:00 Rodrigo Vivi <[1]rodrigo.v...@intel.com>: > > > >On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:31:19PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > >PS: Sorry for