[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/4] kms_content_protection: Fix log bug on 32-bit platforms.

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] kms_content_protection: Fix log bug on 32-bit platforms. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52505/ State : failure == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_4714_full -> IGTPW_2062_full = == Summary - FAILURE == Serio

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev7)

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev7) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/51878/ State : failure == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5140_full -> Patchwork_10827_full = == Summary - FAILURE == Serious unknown change

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Disable LP3 watermarks on all SNB machines (rev2)

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Disable LP3 watermarks on all SNB machines (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52440/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5140_full -> Patchwork_10826_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm: Add CRTC background color property (v2)

2018-11-14 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:17:25AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:48PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > > Some display controllers can be programmed to present non-black colors > > for pixels not covered by any plane (or pixels covered by the > > transparent regions of higher pla

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/4] kms_content_protection: Fix log bug on 32-bit platforms.

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] kms_content_protection: Fix log bug on 32-bit platforms. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52505/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_4714 -> IGTPW_2062 = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/4] Add v3d helper library

2018-11-14 Thread Eric Anholt
Just a few little ioctl wrappers that v3d tests will use. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt --- lib/Makefile.sources | 2 + lib/drmtest.c| 3 + lib/drmtest.h| 1 + lib/igt_v3d.c| 130 +++ lib/igt_v3d.h| 46 +++ l

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] igt/v3d_*: Add new tests for the V3D UABI.

2018-11-14 Thread Eric Anholt
These are basic non-rendering tests of the UABI. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt --- lib/igt_v3d.c | 4 -- tests/Makefile.am | 2 + tests/Makefile.sources| 6 +++ tests/meson.build | 3 ++ tests/v3d_ci/README | 26 + tests/v3d_ci/v3d.testlist | 6

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] kms_content_protection: Fix log bug on 32-bit platforms.

2018-11-14 Thread Eric Anholt
long is different between 32 and 64 and should basically never be used. Fixes compiler warning about passing the wrong type. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt --- tests/kms_content_protection.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/kms_content_protection.c b/tests

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] v3d: Import the V3D DRM UAPI header.

2018-11-14 Thread Eric Anholt
Copied from make headers_install at drm-misc-next 783195ec1cad ("drm/syncobj: disable the timeline UAPI for now v2") Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt --- include/drm-uapi/v3d_drm.h | 204 + 1 file changed, 204 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/drm-uapi/v3d_d

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev7)

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev7) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/51878/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5140 -> Patchwork_10827 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. Externa

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev7)

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev7) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/51878/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim sparse origin/drm-tip Sparse version: v0.5.2 Commit: drm/i915: Reorganize plane register writes to make them more a

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev7)

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev7) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/51878/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 5a11dbcbd5cb drm/i915: Reorganize plane register writes to make them more atomic eb3c2f39

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/i915: Commit skl+ planes in an order that avoids ddb overlaps

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä skl+ can go belly up if there are overlapping ddb allocations between planes. If we could absolutely guarantee that we can perform the atomic update within a single frame we shouldn't have to worry about this. But we can't rely on that so let's steal the ddb overlap check tric

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/13] drm/i915: Remove some useless zeroing on skl+ wm calculations

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä We memset(0) the entire watermark struct the start, so there's no need to clear things later on. v2: Rebase due to some stale w/a removal Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 16 1 file changed, 4 in

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/13] drm/i915: Pass the plane to icl_program_input_csc_coeff()

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä On icl+ the plane state that gets passed to update_slave() is not the plane state of the plane we're programming. With NV12 the plane state would be coming from the master (UV) plane whereas the plane we're programming is the slave (Y) plane. For that reason we need to explici

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/13] drm/i915: Don't pass dev_priv around so much

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Simplify the calling convention of the skl+ watermark functions by not passing around dev_priv needlessly. The callees have what they need to dig it out anyway. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 27 +-- 1 file changed

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/13] drm/i915: Pass the entire skl_plane_wm to skl_compute_transition_wm()

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä We have to pass both level 0 watermark struct and the transition watermark struct to skl_compute_transition_wm(). Make life less confusing by just passing the entire plane watermark struct that contains both aforementioned structures. Cc: Matt Roper Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/13] drm/i915: Rename the confusing 'plane_id' to 'color_plane'

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä A variable whose name is 'plane_id' is expected to be of the enum plane_id type. In this case we have a raw int, which turns out to refer to the plane of the framebuffer. Rename the variable to 'color_plane' in line with the trend started earlier. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/13] drm/i915: Fix latency==0 handling for level 0 watermark on skl+

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä If the level 0 latency is 0 we can't do anything. Return an error rather than success. While this can't happen due to WaWmMemoryReadLatency, it can happen if the user clears out the level 0 latency via debugfs. v2: Clarify how how we can end here with zero level 0 latency (M

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/13] drm/i915: Move single buffered plane register writes to the end

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä The plane color correction registers are single buffered. So ideally we would write them at the start of vblank just after the double buffered plane registers have been latched. Since we have no convenient way to do that for now let's at least move the single buffered register

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/13] drm/i915: Move ddb/wm programming into plane update/disable hooks on skl+

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä On SKL+ the plane WM/BUF_CFG registers are a proper part of each plane's register set. That means accessing them will cancel any pending plane update, and we would need a PLANE_SURF register write to arm the wm/ddb change as well. To avoid all the problems with that let's jus

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/i915: Clean up skl+ vs. icl+ watermark computation

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Make a cleaner split between the skl+ and icl+ ways of computing watermarks. This way skl_build_pipe_wm() doesn't have to know any of the gritty details of icl+ master/slave planes. We can also simplify a bunch of the lower level code by pulling the plane visibility checks a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/13] drm/i915: Pass the new crtc_state to ->disable_plane()

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä We're going to need access to the new crtc state in ->disable_plane() for SKL+ wm/ddb programming and pre-skl pipe gamma/csc control. Pass the crtc state down. We'll also try to make intel_crtc_disable_planes() do the right thing as much as it's possible. The fact that we don

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/13] drm/i915: Introduce crtc_state->update_planes bitmask

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Keep track which planes need updating during the commit. For now this is just (was_visible || is_visible) but I'll have need to update invisible planes later on for skl plane ddbs and for pre-skl pipe gamma/csc control (which lives in the primary plane control register). Revi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/13] drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Here's the remainder of the skl+ ddb/wm programming series. I tried to split up the ugly monster patch into a few chunks, and I tossed in a few extra nuggets on top. I also tried to improve the commit messages a bit based on the previous review feedback. Entire series availab

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/13] drm/i915: Reorganize plane register writes to make them more atomic

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Some observations about the plane registers: - the control register will self-arm if the plane is not already enabled, thus we want to write it as close to (or ideally after) the surface register - tileoff/linoff/offset/aux_offset are self-arming as well so we want them

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52481/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5138_full -> Patchwork_10824_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming wit

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-fixes

2018-11-14 Thread Sean Paul
Hi Dave, Hope you're having a good time in Vancouver, sorry I missed y'all! A bit more activity this week in -fixes, and that's all due to omap. We've got some initialization fixes, the most notable is migrating dss child instantiation from mach-* to the omapdss driver. Please pull at your conve

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Disable LP3 watermarks on all SNB machines (rev2)

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Disable LP3 watermarks on all SNB machines (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52440/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5140 -> Patchwork_10826 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. Externa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/gen9+: Add support for pipe background color (v2)

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:49PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > Gen9+ platforms allow CRTC's to be programmed with a background/canvas > color below the programmable planes. Let's expose this for use by > compositors. > > v2: > - Split out bgcolor sanitization and programming of csc/gamma bits to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Force background color to black for gen9+

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:36:39AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:28:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:47PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > > > We don't yet allow userspace to control the CRTC background color, but > > > we should manually program

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Force background color to black for gen9+

2018-11-14 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:28:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:47PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > > We don't yet allow userspace to control the CRTC background color, but > > we should manually program the color to black to ensure the BIOS didn't > > leave us with some

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Disable LP3 watermarks on all SNB machines

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä I have a Thinkpad X220 Tablet in my hands that is losing vblank interrupts whenever LP3 watermarks are used. If I nudge the latency value written to the WM3 register just by one in either direction the problem disappears. That to me suggests that the punit will not enter the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm: Add CRTC background color property (v2)

2018-11-14 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:20:36PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:48PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: ... > > > > +/* > > + * Put RGBA values into a standard 64-bit representation that can be used > > + * for ioctl parameters, inter-driver commmunication, etc. If the > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Force background color to black for gen9+

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:47PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > We don't yet allow userspace to control the CRTC background color, but > we should manually program the color to black to ensure the BIOS didn't > leave us with some other color. We should also set the pipe gamma and > pipe CSC bits so

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/icl: replace check for combo phy (rev2)

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/icl: replace check for combo phy (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52400/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5133_full -> Patchwork_10818_full = == Summary - WARNING == Mi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm: Add CRTC background color property (v2)

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:48PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > Some display controllers can be programmed to present non-black colors > for pixels not covered by any plane (or pixels covered by the > transparent regions of higher planes). Compositors that want a UI with > a solid color background c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disable LP3 watermarks on all SNB machines

2018-11-14 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2018-11-13 18:40:20) > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 06:25:47PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Ville Syrjala (2018-11-13 18:10:23) > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > I have a Thinkpad X220 Tablet in my hands that is losing vblank > > > interrupts whenever LP3 watermark

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Disable LP3 watermarks on all SNB machines

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Disable LP3 watermarks on all SNB machines URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52440/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5133_full -> Patchwork_10817_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Use explicit old crtc state in skl_compute_wm()

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Use explicit old crtc state in skl_compute_wm() URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52436/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5133_full -> Patchwork_10816_full = == Summary - WARNING ==

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm: Add CRTC background color property (v2)

2018-11-14 Thread Sean Paul
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:48PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > Some display controllers can be programmed to present non-black colors > for pixels not covered by any plane (or pixels covered by the > transparent regions of higher planes). Compositors that want a UI with > a solid color background c

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: remove excess line continuation backslashes

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: remove excess line continuation backslashes URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52477/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5139 -> Patchwork_10825 = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with Patc

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52481/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5138 -> Patchwork_10824 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External URL: ht

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: remove excess line continuation backslashes

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: remove excess line continuation backslashes URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52477/ State : failure == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5138 -> Patchwork_10823 = == Summary - FAILURE == Serious unknown changes coming with Pa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v5 2/8] drm: Add Plane Degamma properties

2018-11-14 Thread Shankar, Uma
>-Original Message- >From: Roper, Matthew D >Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 6:39 AM >To: Shankar, Uma >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; >dcasta...@chromium.org; alexandru-cosmin.gheor...@arm.com; >seanp...@chromium.org; Syrjala, Ville ; >harry.wen

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 -fixes 3/3] drm/i915: Account for scale factor when calculating initial phase

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä To get the initial phase correct we need to account for the scale factor as well. I forgot this initially and was mostly looking at heavily upscaled content where the minor difference between -0.5 and the proper initial phase was not readily apparent. And let's toss in a comm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH -fixes 3/3] drm/i915: Account for scale factor when calculating initial phase

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > To get the initial phase correct we need to account for the scale > factor as well. I forgot this initially and was mostly looking at > heavily upscaled content where the minor difference between -0.5 > and t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:08:06PM +, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > We've been dealing a number of 32/64 bits flags issues lately : > > - 085603287452fc ("drm/i915: Compare user's 64b GTT offset even on 32b") > - c58281056a8b26 ("drm/i915: Mark up GTT sizes as u64") > - 83b466b1dc5f0b ("drm/i9

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags

2018-11-14 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52481/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 04bef9eefcf0 drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags -:8: ERROR:GIT_COMMIT_ID: Please use

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags

2018-11-14 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-11-14 12:08:06) > We've been dealing a number of 32/64 bits flags issues lately : > > - 085603287452fc ("drm/i915: Compare user's 64b GTT offset even on 32b") > - c58281056a8b26 ("drm/i915: Mark up GTT sizes as u64") > - 83b466b1dc5f0b ("drm/i915: Mark pin flags

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: use appropriate integer types for flags

2018-11-14 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
We've been dealing a number of 32/64 bits flags issues lately : - 085603287452fc ("drm/i915: Compare user's 64b GTT offset even on 32b") - c58281056a8b26 ("drm/i915: Mark up GTT sizes as u64") - 83b466b1dc5f0b ("drm/i915: Mark pin flags as u64") As userspace and in particular Mesa pulls in the

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/gen9_bc: Work around DMC bug zeroing power well requests

2018-11-14 Thread Imre Deak
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 12:57:13AM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/gen9_bc: Work around DMC bug > zeroing power well requests > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52302/ > State : success Pushed to -dinq, thanks for the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Compare user's 64b GTT offset even on 32b

2018-11-14 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
Reminds me that we should probably update the uAPI... struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 has a u64 flags and all the EXEC_OBJECT_* flags are (1< - Lionel On 25/10/2018 10:18, Chris Wilson wrote: Beware mixing unsigned long constants and 64b values, as on 32b the constant will be zero extended a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH -fixes 1/3] drm/i915: Move programming plane scaler to its own function.

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Maarten Lankhorst This cleans the code up slightly, and will make other changes easier. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst Reviewed-by: Matt Roper Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180920102711.4184-8-maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com (cherry picked from commit ab5c60b

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH -fixes 3/3] drm/i915: Account for scale factor when calculating initial phase

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä To get the initial phase correct we need to account for the scale factor as well. I forgot this initially and was mostly looking at heavily upscaled content where the minor difference between -0.5 and the proper initial phase was not readily apparent. And let's toss in a comm

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH -fixes 2/3] drm/i915: Clean up skl_program_scaler()

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Remove the "sizes are 0 based" stuff that is not even true for the scaler. v2: Rebase Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181101151736.20522-1-ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi (cherry picked from commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: remove excess line continuation backslashes

2018-11-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 01:21:30PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> While removing .palette_offsets, I removed the commas after >> .trans_offsets in the macros, but failed to remove the line continuation >> backslashes. >> >> While at it, also remove anothe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Remove special case for power well 1/MISC_IO state verification

2018-11-14 Thread Imre Deak
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:19:44PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 04:58:22PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > > Even though PW#1 and the MISC_IO power wells are managed by the > > DMC firmware (toggled dynamically if conditions allow it) from the > > driver's POV they are always on

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: remove excess line continuation backslashes

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 01:21:30PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > While removing .palette_offsets, I removed the commas after > .trans_offsets in the macros, but failed to remove the line continuation > backslashes. > > While at it, also remove another extra comma to be in line with the > other relat

Re: [Intel-gfx] Backports for drm-intel-fixes

2018-11-14 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2018-11-12 14:49:14) > The following patches with Fixes: do not cleanly apply > to drm-intel-fixes: > > - 5a3aeca97af1 ("drm/i915: Fix hpd handling for pins with two encoders") One more: - e7a278a329dd ("drm/i915: Account for scale factor when calculating initial phase"

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: remove excess line continuation backslashes

2018-11-14 Thread Jani Nikula
While removing .palette_offsets, I removed the commas after .trans_offsets in the macros, but failed to remove the line continuation backslashes. While at it, also remove another extra comma to be in line with the other related macros. Fixes: 74c1e826427a ("drm/i915: remove palette_offsets from d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Request no slices if no active pipes

2018-11-14 Thread Imre Deak
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 04:44:54PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Skip the hardware dbuf slice update if we don't have active > pipes. With no active pipes, we don't have powerwell and thus > programming the dbuf slice counts leads to accessing > hardware without runtime pm ref. > > v2: bugzilla ta

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Fix the possible watermark miswriting for skl+

2018-11-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 08:19:26AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 16:40 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Stanislav Lisovskiy (2018-11-13 14:31:38) > > > Currently whenever we attempt to recalculate > > > watermarks, we assign dirty_pipes to zero, > > > then compare

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Fix icl workarounds whitespaces

2018-11-14 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2018-11-09 14:53:33) >> Align icl workarounds whitespace with the rest of the file >> >> Cc: Chris Wilson >> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala > > That'll do. Fine piece of Wensleydale, > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Both patches pushed, thanks for revie

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/icl: Drop spurious register read from icl_dbuf_slices_update

2018-11-14 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Imre Deak writes: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 04:09:23PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: >> Register DBUF_CTL_S2 is read and it's value is not used. As >> there is no explanation why we should prime the hardware with >> read, remove it as spurious. >> >> Fixes: aa9664ffe863 ("drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Fix the possible watermark miswriting for skl+

2018-11-14 Thread Lisovskiy, Stanislav
On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 16:40 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Stanislav Lisovskiy (2018-11-13 14:31:38) > > Currently whenever we attempt to recalculate > > watermarks, we assign dirty_pipes to zero, > > then compare current wm results to the recalculated > > one and if they changed we set corre

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i195: spell out reverse on for_each macros

2018-11-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Do like it's done for list.h macros, and use "reverse" suffix rather > than "rev". > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h| 6 +++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c |

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/icl: reverse uninit order

2018-11-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Bspec 21257 says "DDIA PHY is the comp master, so it must > not be un-initialized if other combo PHYs are in use". Here > we are shutting down all phys, so it's not strictly required. > However let's be consistent on deinitializing things in the > reve

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/icl: replace check for combo phy

2018-11-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > These are the only places that assume ports A and B are the ones with > combo phy. Let's use intel_port_is_combophy() there to make sure > it checks for combo phy ports the same way everywhere. > > v2: define for_each_combo_port() helper to check the