Re: [Intel-gfx] Bug#917280: kernel panic on intel gen4 gfx card

2018-12-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2018-12-25 at 15:45 +, ? ? wrote: > Hi, Greg > > I found on Debian testing with kernel 4.18.20 fail boot, kernel panic > on i915. and reported it to Debian bug 917280 [0], with panic log[1]. > > after revert: > > commit 06e562e7f515292ea7721475950f23554214adde > Author: Chris Wilson

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915: DDI: call intel_psr_ and _edp_drrs_enable() on pipe updates (v2)

2018-12-25 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 20-12-18 18:10, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 02:21:20PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Call intel_psr_enable() and intel_edp_drrs_enable() on pipe updates to make sure that we enable PSR / DRRS (when applicable) on fastsets. Note calling these functions when PSR / DRRS has a

[Intel-gfx] Forced push done to drm-intel-next-queued

2018-12-25 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, As mentioned in the "I messed up drm-intel-next-queued!" mail-thread I made a big mistake yesterday: "Ugh, I just messed up drm-intel-next-queued big time. I somehow rebased my work on top of drm-tip (I believe I did the rebase in the wrong dir) and then after running a bunch of tests I did

Re: [Intel-gfx] I messed up drm-intel-next-queued!

2018-12-25 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 25-12-18 06:08, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: Hi Hans, I’m traveling on vacation and didn’t bring my laptop. I believe Joonas and Jani are out this week as well. I’m in favor of the forced push if you are sure you have the latest one with you. I'm sure I've the latest commit/hash from before