Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 01/21] scripts/trace.pl: Fix after intel_engine_notify removal

On 08/05/2019 13:17, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 13:10:38) From: Tvrtko Ursulin After the removal of engine global seqnos and the corresponding intel_engine_notify tracepoints the script needs to be adjusted to cope with the new state of things. To keep working it

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Add support for asynchronous display power disabling (rev3)

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Add support for asynchronous display power disabling (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/60242/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6068 -> Patchwork_12990

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Add support for asynchronous display power disabling (rev3)

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Add support for asynchronous display power disabling (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/60242/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 09fdc96a8a2a drm/i915: Add support for tracking wakerefs w/o power-on guarantee

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/i915: Add support for asynchronous display power disabling

Quoting Imre Deak (2019-05-09 07:19:47) > By disabling a power domain asynchronously we can restrict holding a > reference on that power domain to the actual code sequence that > requires the power to be on for the HW access it's doing, by also > avoiding unneeded on-off-on togglings of the power d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/11] drm/i915: Force printing wakeref tacking during pm_cleanup

Quoting Imre Deak (2019-05-09 07:19:45) > Make sure we print and drop the wakeref tracking info during pm_cleanup > even if there are wakeref holders (either raw-wakeref or wakelock > holders). Dropping the wakeref tracking means that a late put on the ref > will WARN since the wakeref will be unkn

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/i915: Verify power domains state during suspend in all cases

Quoting Imre Deak (2019-05-09 07:19:46) > There is no reason why we couldn't verify the power domains state during > suspend in all cases, so do that. I overlooked this when originally > adding the check. > > Cc: Chris Wilson > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak Proof of the pudding is in the eating, Rev

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/i915: Add support for tracking wakerefs w/o power-on guarantee

Quoting Imre Deak (2019-05-09 07:19:44) > It's useful to track runtime PM refs that don't guarantee a device > power-on state to the rest of the driver. One such case is holding a > reference that will be put asynchronously, during which normal users > without their own reference shouldn't access t

<    1   2