[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/display: Defeature PSR2 for RKL and ADL-S

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/display: Defeature PSR2 for RKL and ADL-S URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9948_full -> Patchwork_19907_full Summary -

[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree

2021-04-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in: drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c between commit: 35d65ab3fdba ("drm/vc4: plane: Remove redundant assignment") from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit: 5ddb0bd4ddc3 ("drm/atomic: Pass the full state to planes async atomic

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14013723622

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14013723622 URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/0/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9947_full -> Patchwork_19906_full

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Defeature PSR2 for RKL and ADL-S

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/display: Defeature PSR2 for RKL and ADL-S URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9948 -> Patchwork_19907 Summary ---

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915/display: Defeature PSR2 for RKL and ADL-S

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/display: Defeature PSR2 for RKL and ADL-S URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1/ State : warning == Summary == $ make htmldocs 2>&1 > /dev/null | grep i915 ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c:102: warning: Function parameter or m

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14013723622

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14013723622 URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/0/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9947 -> Patchwork_19906

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14013723622

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14013723622 URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/0/ State : warning == Summary == $ make htmldocs 2>&1 > /dev/null | grep i915 ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c:102: warning: Funct

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14013723622

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14013723622 URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/0/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip Sparse version: v0.6.2 Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separate

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [CI,1/3] drm/i915: Skip display interruption setup when display is not available

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [CI,1/3] drm/i915: Skip display interruption setup when display is not available URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88879/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9946_full -> Patchwork_19905_full ===

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Defeature PSR2 for RKL and ADL-S

2021-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:42:05PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > PSR2 is defeatured for RKL and ADL-S, no important power impact as > those are desktop CPUs and PSR2 was not even enabled by default yet > in platforms without PSR2 HW tracking. > > HSDES: 14011750631 > HSDES: 14011741325 > B

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/16] drm/i915/pxp: Create the arbitrary session after boot

2021-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:56:59PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > From: "Huang, Sean Z" > > Create the arbitrary session, with the fixed session id 0xf, after > system boot, for the case that application allocates the protected > buffer without establishing any protection session. Because

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/16] drm/i915/pxp: set KCR reg init

2021-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:56:58PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > The setting is required by hardware to allow us doing further protection > operation such as sending commands to GPU or TEE. The register needs to > be re-programmed on resume, so for simplicitly we bundle the programming > w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/16] drm/i915/pxp: Implement funcs to create the TEE channel

2021-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:56:57PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > From: "Huang, Sean Z" > > Implement the funcs to create the TEE channel, so kernel can > send the TEE commands directly to TEE for creating the arbitrary > (default) session. > > v2: fix locking, don't pollute dev_priv (Ch

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/16] drm/i915/pxp: allocate a vcs context for pxp usage

2021-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:56:56PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > The context is required to send the session termination commands to the > VCS, which will be implemented in a follow-up patch. We can also use the > presence of the context as a check of pxp initialization completion. > > v2

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Defeature PSR2 for RKL and ADL-S

2021-04-08 Thread José Roberto de Souza
PSR2 is defeatured for RKL and ADL-S, no important power impact as those are desktop CPUs and PSR2 was not even enabled by default yet in platforms without PSR2 HW tracking. HSDES: 14011750631 HSDES: 14011741325 BSpec: 53273 Cc: Caz Yokoyama Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Sou

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [CI,1/3] drm/i915: Skip display interruption setup when display is not available

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [CI,1/3] drm/i915: Skip display interruption setup when display is not available URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88879/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9946 -> Patchwork_19905 =

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/16] drm/i915/pxp: Define PXP component interface

2021-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:55:03PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > > On 29.03.2021 00:56, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > > This will be used for communication between the i915 driver and the mei > > one. Defining it in a stand-alone patch to avoid circualr dependedencies > > typos > > > bet

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for series starting with [CI,1/3] drm/i915: Skip display interruption setup when display is not available

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [CI,1/3] drm/i915: Skip display interruption setup when display is not available URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88879/ State : warning == Summary == $ make htmldocs 2>&1 > /dev/null | grep i915 ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_g

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14013723622

2021-04-08 Thread José Roberto de Souza
This WA fix some display glitches when the system is under high memory pressure. BSpec: 52890 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 + 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/g

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] Revert "drm/i915/tgl/psr: Fix glitches when doing frontbuffer modifications"

2021-04-08 Thread José Roberto de Souza
This reverts commit 71c1a4998320962f7b8362b2c5ee36610d49e8fb. The proper fix is Wa_14013723622, so now we can revert this WA and get back some power savings. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 16 +--- 1 file chan

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH CI 1/3] drm/i915: Skip display interruption setup when display is not available

2021-04-08 Thread José Roberto de Souza
Return ealier in the functions doing interruption setup for GEN8+ also adding a warning in gen8_de_irq_handler() to let us know that something else is still missing. Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada Cc: Ville Syrjälä Cc: Lucas De Marchi Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza Signed-off-by: Jani

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH CI 2/3] drm/i915: Do not set any power wells when there is no display

2021-04-08 Thread José Roberto de Souza
Power wells are only part of display block and not necessary when running a headless driver. Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada Cc: Lucas De Marchi Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 5 - 1 file changed,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH CI 3/3] drm/i915: skip display initialization when there is no display

2021-04-08 Thread José Roberto de Souza
Display features should not be initialized or de-initialized when there is no display. Skip modeset initialization, output setup, plane, crtc, encoder, connector registration, display cdclk and rawclk initialization, display core initialization, etc. Skip the functionality at as high level as poss

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] gem_watchdog: Fix autotools build

2021-04-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 03:03:49PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:43:16PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > > > Correcting a brain malfunction while typing in Makefile.sources. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Reviewed-by: Petri Latval

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: missing workarounds and refactors (rev2)

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: missing workarounds and refactors (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88408/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9934_full -> Patchwork_19904_full Summary -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/20] drm: Use new DRM printk funcs (like drm_dbg_*()) in DP helpers

2021-04-08 Thread Lyude Paul
JFYI too - there was a legitimate looking CI failure on intel with this series, so don't be surprised if I have to respin a patch or two (I should be able to get it asap as I finally just cleared most of the stuff on my plate off for a while) On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 14:13 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: missing workarounds and refactors (rev2)

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: missing workarounds and refactors (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88408/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9934 -> Patchwork_19904 Summary ---

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915: missing workarounds and refactors (rev2)

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: missing workarounds and refactors (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88408/ State : warning == Summary == $ make htmldocs 2>&1 > /dev/null | grep i915 ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c:102: warning: Function parameter or m

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI: utils: Add acpi_reduced_hardware() helper

2021-04-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:58 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Add a getter for the acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware variable so that modules > can check if they are running on an ACPI reduced-hw platform or not. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > --- > Changes in v2: > - Use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL instead of EXPOR

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix invalid access to ACPI _DSM objects

2021-04-08 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Thu, 08 Apr 2021 18:56:06 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 06:34:06PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Apr 2021 09:51:18 +0200, > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:28:48 +0200, > > > Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > > > > > Oh, could you ask

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix invalid access to ACPI _DSM objects

2021-04-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 06:34:06PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Thu, 08 Apr 2021 09:51:18 +0200, > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:28:48 +0200, > > Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > > > Oh, could you ask the bug reporter to attach an acpidump to the > > > bug? Might be good to ha

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix invalid access to ACPI _DSM objects

2021-04-08 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Thu, 08 Apr 2021 09:51:18 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:28:48 +0200, > Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > Oh, could you ask the bug reporter to attach an acpidump to the > > bug? Might be good to have that stuff on record somewhere if/when > > someone wants to actually figure

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/hdcp: Fix uninitialized symbol 'msg_end' (rev2)

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/hdcp: Fix uninitialized symbol 'msg_end' (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88756/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9934_full -> Patchwork_19903_full Sum

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm-intel-fixes tree

2021-04-08 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 12:38:52PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 09:23:35PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > thanks for the report. > > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 09:01:17AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:58

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/hdcp: Fix uninitialized symbol 'msg_end' (rev2)

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/hdcp: Fix uninitialized symbol 'msg_end' (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88756/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9934 -> Patchwork_19903 Summary -

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915/hdcp: Fix uninitialized symbol 'msg_end' (rev2)

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/hdcp: Fix uninitialized symbol 'msg_end' (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88756/ State : warning == Summary == $ make htmldocs 2>&1 > /dev/null | grep i915 ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c:102: warning: Function parameter

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [RFC,1/2] tests/core_hotunplug: Add perf health check

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [RFC,1/2] tests/core_hotunplug: Add perf health check URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88847/ State : failure == Summary == Applying: tests/core_hotunplug: Add perf health check error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (test

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [RFC,1/2] tests/core_hotunplug: Add perf health check

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [RFC,1/2] tests/core_hotunplug: Add perf health check URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88845/ State : failure == Summary == Applying: tests/core_hotunplug: Add perf health check error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (test

Re: [Intel-gfx] add remap_pfn_range_notrack instead of reinventing it in i915 v2

2021-04-08 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 12:36:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I've seen it's landed already in some tree, maybe if you can add the acks > ftr? Andrew has picked it up in -mm. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.fre

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/20] drm: Use new DRM printk funcs (like drm_dbg_*()) in DP helpers

2021-04-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 08 Apr 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I think Dave caught up on pulls to drm-next, so after a backmerge of that > to drm-misc-next I think should be all fine to apply directly, no need for > topic branch. Yup. We've done the backmerges to drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next, and are all in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/20] drm: Use new DRM printk funcs (like drm_dbg_*()) in DP helpers

2021-04-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:40:33PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Lyude Paul wrote: > > Since it's been asked quite a few times on some of the various DP > > related patch series I've submitted to use the new DRM printk helpers, > > and it technically wasn't really trivial to do

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm-intel-fixes tree

2021-04-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 09:23:35PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > thanks for the report. > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 09:01:17AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:58:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > After merging the drm-intel-f

Re: [Intel-gfx] add remap_pfn_range_notrack instead of reinventing it in i915 v2

2021-04-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:55:01AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > i915 has some reason to want to avoid the track_pfn_remap overhead in > remap_pfn_range. Add a function to the core VM to do just that rather > than reinventing the functionality poorly in the driver. > > Note that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/7] Default request/fence expiry + watchdog

2021-04-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:31:10AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 26/03/2021 09:10, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:13:28PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > > > > > "Watchdog" aka "restoring hangcheck" aka default request/fence expiry - > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't zero out the Y plane's watermarks

2021-04-08 Thread Lisovskiy, Stanislav
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 02:59:45AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Don't zero out the watermarks for the Y plane since we've already > computed them when computing the UV plane's watermarks (since the > UV plane always appears before ethe Y plane when iterating through > the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/hdcp: Fix uninitialized symbol 'msg_end'

2021-04-08 Thread Nautiyal, Ankit K
LGTM Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal On 4/8/2021 1:56 PM, Anshuman Gupta wrote: Fix static analysis tool uninitialized symbol error. v2: - use ktime_set(0, 0) instead to initialize to zero. [Ankit] Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta --- d

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/hdcp: Fix uninitialized symbol 'msg_end'

2021-04-08 Thread Anshuman Gupta
Fix static analysis tool uninitialized symbol error. v2: - use ktime_set(0, 0) instead to initialize to zero. [Ankit] Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/2] tests/core_hotunplug: Add perf health check

2021-04-08 Thread Janusz Krzysztofik
Sorry for double submission, I had to resend due to a typo in igt-dev list address. Janusz On czwartek, 8 kwietnia 2021 10:30:08 CEST Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > Sometimes CI reports skips of perf subtests when run subsequently after > core_hotunplug. That may be an indication of issues with re

[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 2/2] intel-ci: Unblock core_hotunplug@*hot*bind* subtests

2021-04-08 Thread Janusz Krzysztofik
Commit be529747d8ea ("intel-ci: Broaden core_hotunplug blacklist") blamed issues triggered by hot variants[*] as responsible for random failures in subsequently executed tests, According to the issue history[*], last reported occurrences were not related to core_hotunplug. Remove *hot*bind* subte

[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/2] tests/core_hotunplug: Add perf health check

2021-04-08 Thread Janusz Krzysztofik
Sometimes CI reports skips of perf subtests when run subsequently after core_hotunplug. That may be an indication of issues with restoring device perf features on driver (hot)rebind. Detect device perf support at test start and check if still available after driver rebind. If that fails, a post-

[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/2] tests/core_hotunplug: Add perf health check

2021-04-08 Thread Janusz Krzysztofik
Sometimes CI reports skips of perf subtests when run subsequently after core_hotunplug. That may be an indication of issues with restoring device perf features on driver (hot)rebind. Detect device perf support at test start and check if still available after driver rebind. If that fails, a post-

[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 2/2] intel-ci: Unblock core_hotunplug@*hot*bind* subtests

2021-04-08 Thread Janusz Krzysztofik
Commit be529747d8ea ("intel-ci: Broaden core_hotunplug blacklist") blamed issues triggered by hot variants[*] as responsible for random failures in subsequently executed tests, According to the issue history[*], last reported occurrences were not related to core_hotunplug. Remove *hot*bind* subte

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix invalid access to ACPI _DSM objects

2021-04-08 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:28:48 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 06:56:15PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 18:34:46 +0200, > > Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:23:17AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > intel_dsm_platform_mux_info

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Extend GEN renames to the rest of the driver (rev2)

2021-04-08 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Extend GEN renames to the rest of the driver (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88825/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9934_full -> Patchwork_19900_full