On 5/25/22 20:43, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error capture interactions, including no longer needing
NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS for objects marked for capture.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Pull the underrun status sanitation into its own helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
On the series,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula
I'll respin my state readout extraction on top of this once you've
merged.
> ---
>
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Abstract the bit extraction from the VBT per-panel bitfields
> slightly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 31 +--
>
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Older VBTs don't have all the stuff we've defined for the
> LVDS options block (40). In particular we're currently parsing
> the DPS panel type bits even though they may not exist, which
> could mean we end up flagging the
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Parsing the panel_type is a bit special and should be done
> before we parse anything else potentially panel-specific from
> the VBT. So move it out from parse_panel_options(). It doesn't
> neet to be there anyway since it'll do
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> The WARN shouldn't have been added yet. For the moment the
> clock that gets passed here is just what the user has requested
> (via the modeline) and may not be exactly what iCLKIP can
> generate.
>
> Later on the plan is to
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, Jouni Högander wrote:
> This patch set disables connector polling when entering runtime
> suspend for headless sku to prevent waking it up again when poll
> is performed.
Pushed to drm-intel-next, thanks for the patches.
BR,
Jani.
>
> v3:
> - dummy
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 12:48:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> v2 of [1]. Address review comments, drop crtc state compare move, add hw
> state readout split, and sprinkle some struct
> drm_i915_private *i915 cleanups on top.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> [1]
From: Ville Syrjälä
The WARN shouldn't have been added yet. For the moment the
clock that gets passed here is just what the user has requested
(via the modeline) and may not be exactly what iCLKIP can
generate.
Later on the plan is to change things so that we already get
passed the exact clock
Pass struct drm_i915_private * instead of struct drm_device *, and
rename dev_priv to i915.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 +-
.../drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c| 199 +-
.../drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.h
Prefer struct drm_i915_private *i915 over struct drm_device or dev_priv.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 60 ++--
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
Split out the modeset hardware state readout and sanitize, or state
setup, to a separate file.
Do some drive-by checkpatch fixes while at it.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 730
Rename dev_priv to i915 in crtc state dumping code.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
.../drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c | 80 +--
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
Add the brackets [] around crtc state dump context string in
intel_crtc_state_dump() so the callers don't have to.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 6 +++---
Declutter intel_display.c by splitting out crtc state dumping to a
separate file.
v2: intel_pipe_config_dump -> intel_crtc_state_dump
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 +
.../drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c | 314 +
Add new file intel_modeset_verify.c for high level modeset verification
code to declutter intel_display.h. The new file is supposed to be about
crtc/encoder/connector verification; the state verification for very
specific functionality such as plls or wm should be placed next to the
code it
Keep the mpllb implementation details together in intel_snps_phy.c. Also
declutter intel_display.c.
v2: intel_mpllb_verify_state -> void intel_mpllb_state_verify (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 46
The pipe_config_mismatch() function is primarily for logging comparison
results.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
Keep the shared dpll implementation details together by moving the dpll
state verification to intel_dpll_mgr.c. Also declutter intel_display.c.
v2: intel_shared_dpll_verify_state -> intel_shared_dpll_state_verify (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä
---
By moving wm state verification to intel_pm.c, we can make a bunch of
functions static, hiding the wm details better. Also declutter
intel_display.c.
v2: intel_wm_state_verify -> intel_wm_verify_state (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä
---
v2 of [1]. Address review comments, drop crtc state compare move, add hw
state readout split, and sprinkle some struct
drm_i915_private *i915 cleanups on top.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105156/
Jani Nikula (11):
drm/i915/wm: move wm state verification to
On 15/06/2022 16:20, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 08:22:23AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 14/06/2022 17:42, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 05:07:37PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 14/06/2022 17:02, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/dsi: add payload receiving code (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105096/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11763_full -> Patchwork_105096v3_full
Hi Dave & Daniel -
drm-intel-fixes-2022-06-16:
drm/i915 fixes for v5.19-rc3:
- Fix page fault on error state read
- Fix memory leaks in per-gt sysfs
- Fix multiple fence handling
- Remove accidental static from a local variable
BR,
Jani.
The following changes since commit
== Series Details ==
Series: Get dsc optimal output bpp
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105200/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11763_full -> Patchwork_105200v1_full
Summary
---
On 15/06/2022 16:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
Don't allow two engines to be reset in parallel, as they would both
try to select a reset bit (and send requests to common registers)
and wait on that register, at the same time. Serialize control of
the reset requests/acks
On 15/06/2022 16:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
Don't flush TLBs when the buffer is only used in the GGTT under full
control of the kernel, as there's no risk of of concurrent access
and stale access from prefetch.
We only need to invalidate the TLB if they are
On 15/06/2022 16:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
Skip all further TLB invalidations once the device is wedged and
had been reset, as, on such cases, it can no longer process instructions
on the GPU and the user no longer has access to the TLB's in each engine.
Fixes:
Hi Dave, Daniel,
Here's this week drm-misc-fixes PR
Maxime
drm-misc-fixes-2022-06-16:
Two fixes for TTM, one for a NULL pointer dereference and one to make sure
the buffer is pinned prior to a bulk move, and a fix for a spurious
compiler warning.
The following changes since commit
On 15/06/2022 16:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
As an extension of the current skip TLB invalidations,
check if the device is powered down prior to any engine activity,
as, on such cases, all the TLBs were already invalidated, so an
explicit TLB invalidation is not
On 15/06/2022 17:14, Ye, Tony wrote:
On 6/15/2022 3:13 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 15/06/2022 00:15, Ye, Tony wrote:
On 6/14/2022 8:30 AM, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote:
On 6/14/2022 12:44 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 13/06/2022 19:13, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote:
On 6/13/2022 10:39
== Series Details ==
Series: i915: Extract, polish, and document multicast handling
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105134/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11758_full -> Patchwork_105134v1_full
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/dsi: add payload receiving code (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/105096/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11763 -> Patchwork_105096v3
Summary
---
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
