== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/display: add support for dual panel backlight (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/106929/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11971_full -> Patchwork_106929v3_full
===
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/display: add support for dual panel backlight (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/106929/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11971 -> Patchwork_106929v3
Sum
The patch with commit 20f85ef89d94 ("drm/i915/backlight: use unique
backlight device names") already adds support for dual panel backlight
but with error prints. Since the patch tried to create the backlight
device with the same name and upon failure will try with a different
name it leads to failu
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikula, Jani
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 7:03 PM
> To: Murthy, Arun R ; intel-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Murthy, Arun R
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] drm/i915/display: add support for dual panel
> backlight
>
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2022, Arun R Murthy wr
On 2022-08-05 at 14:10:52 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Everything we are testing here unfortunately fits within one packet (8M)
> which means we have zero coverage when we need to split the copy over
> multiple packets (including the aux CCS state).
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
> Cc: Thomas He
On 2022-08-05 at 14:22:40 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Crucible + recent Mesa seems to sometimes hit:
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(num_ccs_blks > NUM_CCS_BLKS_PER_XFER)
>
> And it looks like we can also trigger this with gem_lmem_swapping, if we
> modify the test to use slightly larger object sizes.
>
> Looki
On 2022-08-05 at 14:22:39 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> We only ever need to emit one ccs block copy command.
Since max size we handle at a time is CHUNK_SZ, we will need only one
cmd.
Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
> Cc: Thomas Hellström
> Cc: Ramalingam C
> ---
> d
