On 11/19/21 17:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 5:10 PM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>>> The main problem with this approach is that as soon as you start
>>> actually reducing the unneeded indirect includes, you
Hi Arnd,
On 11/19/21 16:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> From what I can tell, linux/stddef.h is tiny, I don't think it's really
> worth optimizing this part. I have spent some time last year
> trying to untangle some of the more interesting headers, but ended
> up not completing this as there are
Hi Andy,
On 11/19/21 16:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 04:06:27PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
>> Yes, I would like to untangle the dependencies.
>>
>> The main reason I started doing this splitting
>> is because I wouldn't be
Hi Jani,
On 11/19/21 13:47, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
In the first and second commits
I changed a lot of stuff in many parts,
and that's why I CCd so many people (also in this cover letter).
However, to avoid spamming,
and since it would be a nightmare
Hi Arnd,
On 11/19/21 15:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 12:36 PM Alejandro Colomar
> wrote:
>>
>> Alejandro Colomar (17):
>> linux/container_of.h: Add memberof(T, m)
>> Use memberof(T, m) instead of explicit NULL dereference
>> Replace some uses of memberof() by its
