On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 14:57 +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 09:40 +,
> intel-gfx-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
> Hi,
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Add support for mapping
> &g
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 09:40 +,
intel-gfx-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
Hi,
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Add support for mapping
> an object page by page
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/8528/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 11:31 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 31/05/16 07:19, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
.
.
.
> > +
> > +void i915_gem_stolen_size_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 11:58 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 03/06/16 09:51, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > Check for available stolen memory size before attempting to run
> > the stolen memory tests. This way we make sur
ines (Chris)
> >
> > v3: Added POSTING_READ post register write (Tvrtko)
> >
> > v4: Rebase (Ankit)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> > Signed-off-by: Ankitprasad Sharma
> > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
> > ---
> > drivers/char/agp/int
On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 15:59 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 21/04/16 15:46, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:04:52PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 20/04/16 12:17, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> >>> + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >>> +
>
On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 09:45 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:52:50AM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > Skip gem_stolen and pread/pwrite on stolen backed objects if Intel
> > RST device i
Hi,
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 11:40 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > + if (likely(!i915.prefault_disable)) {
> > + ret = fault_in_multipages_writeable(user_data, remain);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + mutex_lock(&dev->str
allows us to map a single page in to the mappable
> > aperture
> > space. This can be iterated over to access the whole object by using space
> > as
> > meagre as page size.
> >
> > v2: Added low level rpm assertions to insert_page routines (Chris)
&g
Hi,
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 11:40 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 04/02/16 09:30, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch adds support for extending the pread/pwrite functionality
> > for objects not backed by shmem. T
On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 19:26 +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:57:29PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, January 18, 2016 02:31:00 PM Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 15:51 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wr
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 15:51 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, January 14, 2016 11:46:46 AM ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > Some modules, like i915.ko, needs to detect when certain ACPI features
> >
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 21:29 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:15:54PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > Is that not what was written? I take it my telepathy isn't working
> > > again.
> >
> > Sorry not a new loop, new case in a old loop. This is the hunk I think
> > is not h
On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 11:20 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 22/12/15 06:20, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > Propagating correct error codes to userspace by using ERR_PTR and
> > PTR_ERR macros for stolen memory based obje
On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 10:44 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22/12/15 06:20, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > In pwrite_fast, map an object page by page if obj_ggtt_pin fails. First,
> > we try a nonblocking pin
On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 10:05 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > index d727b49..ebce8c9 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait {
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 13:22 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:06:16AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:07:58PM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 10:59 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On T
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 14:06 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/12/15 12:46, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > Extend the drm_i915_gem_create structure to add support for
> > creating Stolen memory backed
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 18:18 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 10/12/15 11:12, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 19:39 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >> On 09/12/15 16:15, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> &g
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 18:00 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 10/12/15 14:15, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >
> > On 10/12/15 13:17, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 09:43 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 14:15 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 10/12/15 13:17, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 09:43 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Two more comments below:
> >>
> >> On 09/12/15 12:46, a
t;
> > Just use the global_list rather than invent a new stolen_list. This is
> > the slowpath hibernate and so adding a new list and the associated
> > complexity isn't worth it.
> >
> > v3: Rebased on drm-intel-nightly (Ankit)
> >
> > v4: Use insert_page
. This is
> > the slowpath hibernate and so adding a new list and the associated
> > complexity isn't worth it.
> >
> > v3: Rebased on drm-intel-nightly (Ankit)
> >
> > v4: Use insert_page to map stolen memory backed pages for migration to
> >
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 19:39 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 09/12/15 16:15, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 09/12/15 12:46, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> >> From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >>
> >> This patch adds support
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 16:24 +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
Missed Chris in last mail, adding him
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 16:15 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/12/15 12:46, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> >
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 16:15 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/12/15 12:46, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch adds support for extending the pread/pwrite functionality
> > for objects not backed
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 13:57 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:16:17PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch adds support for clearing buffer objects via CPU/GTT. This
> > is particular
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 13:57 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 09/12/15 12:46, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch adds support for clearing buffer objects via CPU/GTT. This
> > is particularly useful for clearing out t
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 13:26 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 09/12/15 12:46, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch adds support for clearing buffer objects via CPU/GTT. This
> > is particularly useful for clearing out t
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 10:59 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 05:15:59PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > In pwrite_fast, map an object page by page if obj_ggtt_pin fails. First,
> > we try a
On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 17:23 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 11/11/15 10:36, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch adds support for extending the pread/pwrite functionality
> > for objects not backed by shmem. T
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 09:55 +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com writes:
>
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > In pwrite_fast, map an object page by page if obj_ggtt_pin fails. First,
> > we try a nonblocking pin for the whole object (since
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:34 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 05:15:59PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > In pwrite_fast, map an object page by page if obj_ggtt_pin fails. First,
> > we try a
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 12:02 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 11:54:29AM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > + /* stolen objects are already pinned to prevent shrinkage */
> > + memset(&node, 0, sizeof(node));
> > + ret = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range_generic(
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 14:56 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/10/15 07:24, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch adds support for extending the pread/pwrite functionality
> > for objects not backed
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 12:02 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 11:54:29AM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > + /* stolen objects are already pinned to prevent shrinkage */
> > + memset(&node, 0, sizeof(node));
> > + ret = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range_generic(
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 15:35 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:03:23PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch series adds support for creating/using Stolen memory backed
> > objects
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:49 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:03:25PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > i915_gem_create(struct drm_file *file,
> > struct drm_device *dev,
> > uint64_t size,
> > + uint32_t flags,
> >
> > v5: Rebased to the latest drm-intel-nightly (Ankit)
> > Added a seperate list to maintain purgable objects from stolen memory
> > region (Chris/Daniel)
> >
> > Testcase: igt/gem_stolen
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> > Signed-off-by: Ankitprasad
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:54 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:03:27PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > @@ -1090,17 +1184,17 @@ i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> > *data,
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - /* prime objects h
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 18:46 +0530, Goel, Akash wrote:
>
> On 7/22/2015 8:09 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 07:21:49PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> > wrote:
> >> static int
> >> i915_gem_shmem_pread(struct drm_device *dev,
> >> struct drm_i915_ge
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 11:25 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:28:13PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > We are trying to reduce the time for which the global 'struct_mutex'
> >
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 11:51 +0100, Siluvery, Arun wrote:
> On 24/08/2015 12:58, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch provides support for the User to populate the object
> > with system pages at its creation tim
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 13:35 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:28:14PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > +static int
> > +__i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> > +{
> > + const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops *ops = obj->ops;
> > +
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 10:52 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 07/01/2015 10:26 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This test validates the two parameters (size and flags) GEM_CREATE ioctl.
> >
> > v2: Add
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 10:37 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 07/01/2015 10:26 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch adds support to verify pread/pwrite for non-shmem backed
> > objects. It also shows the pread/p
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 09:46 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 01:12:11PM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:50 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:30:43AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > > Well.
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:50 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:30:43AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > Well.. I the meantime why duplicate it when
> > i915_gem_validate_context does i915_gem_context_get and deferred
> > create if needed. I don't see the downside. Snippet from
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 15:39 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:55:12PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Rodrigo Vivi
> >
> > When constructing a batchbuffer, it is sometimes crucial to know the
> > largest hole into which we can fit a fenceable buffe
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 09:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> &g
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended
> > gem_create ioctl. B
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:27 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:01:59PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ankitprasad Sharma
> >
> > This patch extends the get_aperture_ioctl to add support
> > for getting total size of t
52 matches
Mail list logo
