Re: [Intel-gfx] Small bar recovery vs compressed content on DG2

, then so be it. But I'm asking whether we can instead handle this specially, instead of adding generic complexity to the primary code paths. Jon > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Hellström > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 2:48 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; Joonas Lahtinen > ;

Re: [Intel-gfx] Small bar recovery vs compressed content on DG2

nas Lahtinen ; Bloomfield, Jon > ; Intel Graphics Development g...@lists.freedesktop.org>; Auld, Matthew ; C, > Ramalingam > Subject: Re: Small bar recovery vs compressed content on DG2 > > On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 10:43 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Quoting Thomas Hell

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/4] GuC HWCONFIG with documentation

Acked-by: Jon Bloomfield > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of > Jordan Justen > Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 1:05 PM > To: intel-gfx > Cc: dri-devel > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/4] GuC HWCONFIG with documentation > > This is John/Rodrigo's 2 patches with some

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adlp: Remove require_force_probe protection

Assuming the whitespace cleanup requested below is completed: Acked-by: Jon Bloomfield > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of > Rodrigo Vivi > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 2:33 PM > To: Taylor, Clinton A > Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Add i915_gem_context_is_full_ppgtt

> -Original Message- > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 9:42 AM > To: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Daniel Vetter ; DRI Development de...@lists.freedesktop.org>; Intel Graphics Development g...@lists.freedesktop.org>; Maarten Lankhorst > ; Vette

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Peres > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 1:06 AM > To: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Jason Ekstrand ; Brost, Matthew > ; intel-gfx ; > dri-devel ; Ursulin, Tvrtko > ; Ekstrand, Jason ; > Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele ; Bloomfield, Jon > ; Vet

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/doc/rfc: i915 DG1 uAPI

> -Original Message- > From: Auld, Matthew > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:39 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Thomas Hellström > ; Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele > ; Lionel Landwerlin > ; Bloomfield, Jon > ; Justen, Jordan L ; > Ve

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Allow the sysadmin to override security mitigations

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 7:04 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Bloomfield, Jon > ; Vivi, Rodrigo ; > sta...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: All

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Include asm sources for {ivb, hsw}_clear_kernel.c

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of > Rodrigo Vivi > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 1:18 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Alexandre Oliva ; Nikula, Jani ; > sta...@vger.kernel.org; Chris Wilson > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Include asm sources for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gen7: Clear all EU/L3 residual contexts

; ; Phillips, D Scott ; > Vetter, Daniel ; Stewart, David C > ; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Balestrieri, > Francesco ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; > Nikula, Jani ; Bloomfield, Jon > ; Kuoppala, Mika ; > Aran, Omer ; Pathi, Pragyansri > ; Kumar Valsan, Prathap > ; Dut

Re: [Intel-gfx] drm-next + i915 CVE yolo merge

> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Vetter > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 12:13 AM > To: Dave Airlie > Cc: Jani Nikula ; Bloomfield, Jon > ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Chris Wilson ; > Stephen Rothwell ; dri-devel de...@lists.freedesktop.org>; In

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt: Use COND_BBEND for busy spinning on gen9

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 11:47 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Bloomfield, Jon ; Lahtinen, Joonas > ; Vivi, Rodrigo ; > Kuoppala, Mika ; Mika Kuoppala > > Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] igt: Use C

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Introduce DRM_I915_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Abdiel > Janulgue > Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 2:19 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Auld, Matthew > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Introduce > DRM_I915_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET > > This is really just an alias

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/30] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 7:24 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Winiarski, Michal > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 20/30] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contex

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 7:23 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Winiarski, Michal > ; Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent context

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/30] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 4:20 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Ursulin, Tvrtko ; > Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: [PATCH 21/30] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbea

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/30] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 4:20 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Winiarski, Michal > ; Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: [PATCH 20/30] drm/i915: Cancel non-pers

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Prevent bonded requests from overtaking each other on preemption

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 9:04 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org; Tvrtko Ursulin > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Prevent bonded requests from > overtaking each other on pr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Prevent bonded requests from overtaking each other on preemption

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Tvrtko > Ursulin > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 8:12 AM > To: Chris Wilson ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Prevent bonded requests from > overtaking each other on preemption > > > On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/36] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 1:12 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Winiarski, Michal > ; Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: [PATCH 28/36] drm/i915: Cancel non-pers

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/36] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 1:12 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Ursulin, Tvrtko ; > Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: [PATCH 29/36] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbea

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/28] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 9:57 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Ursulin, Tvrtko > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 28/28] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/28] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 12:22 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Ursulin, Tvrtko ; > Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: [PATCH 28/28] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbea

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/28] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 12:22 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Winiarski, Michal > ; Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: [PATCH 27/28] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent context

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Friday, August 9, 2019 4:35 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Winiarski, Michal > ; Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 9:51 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Winiarski, Michal > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 8:08 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Winiarski, Michal > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 7:14 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Winiarski, Michal > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 6:23 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Winiarski, Michal > ; Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 6:47 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Winiarski, Michal > ; Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent context

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

> -Original Message- > From: Joonas Lahtinen > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 5:50 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org; Chris Wilson > Cc: Ursulin, Tvrtko > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats > > Quoting Chr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

nal Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 2:30 PM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Ursulin, Tvrtko > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats > > Quoting Bloomfield, Jon (2

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 1:11 PM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Ursulin, Tvrtko > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats > > Quoti

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 4:52 PM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Ursulin, Tvrtko > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats > > Qu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 4:28 PM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Ursulin, Tvrtko > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats > > Qu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 4:17 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Ursulin, Tvrtko ; > Bloomfield, Jon > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbea

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Add missing VECS engine

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Tvrtko > Ursulin > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 10:22 PM > To: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele ; Roper, > Matthew D ; Souza, Jose > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Add missing VECS engine >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 12/35] drm/i915: Implement the HDCP2.2 support for DP

I'm not formally reviewing this series, but while glancing at it, I noticed > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of > Ramalingam C > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 2:43 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; > daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch;

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 7/7] drm/i915: add a sysfs entry to let users set sseu configs

continue discussing while we progress the gen11 solution. Jon > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of > Bloomfield, Jon > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 9:44 AM > To: Tvrtko Ursulin ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Chris Wilson ; > Landwerlin, Lionel G ; intel- > g.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 7/7] drm/i915: add a sysfs entry to let users set sseu configs

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of > Tvrtko Ursulin > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 1:29 AM > To: Joonas Lahtinen ; Chris Wilson > ; Landwerlin, Lionel G > ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 7/7] drm/i915: add a sysfs entry to let >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/gtt: Disable read-only support under GVT

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 1:06 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; Zhenyu Wang > > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Zhenyu Wang > ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Matthew Auld > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/gtt: Disab

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/gtt: Disable read-only support under GVT

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 11:53 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Zhenyu Wang > ; Bloomfield, Jon ; > Joonas Lahtinen ; Matthew Auld > > Subject: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/gtt: Disable

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Reject attempted pwrites into a read-only object

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 5:00 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Bloomfield, Jon > ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Matthew Auld > > Subject: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Reject attempted pwrite

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/userptr: Enable read-only support on gen8+

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 5:00 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Bloomfield, Jon > ; Joonas Lahtinen > > Subject: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/userptr: Enable read-only support on gen8+ > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Prevent writing into a read-only object via a GGTT mmap

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 9:07 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Chris Wilson ; > Bloomfield, Jon ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Matthew Auld > ; David Herrmann > > Subject

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Prevent writing into a read-only object via a GGTT mmap

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 8:22 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Matthew Auld > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Prevent writing into a read-only

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Prevent writing into a read-only object via a GGTT mmap

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 8:00 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen ; Matthew Auld > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Prevent writing into a read-only object via &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Prevent writing into a read-only object via a GGTT mmap

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 5:00 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson ; Bloomfield, Jon > ; Joonas Lahtinen > ; Matthew Auld > > Subject: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Prevent writing into a read-on

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Adjust BSD2 semantics to mean any second VCS instance

> -Original Message- > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com> > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 9:56 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon <jon.bloomfi...@intel.com>; Tvrtko Ursulin > <tursu...@ursulin.net>; Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Adjust BSD2 semantics to mean any second VCS instance

> -Original Message- > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursu...@ursulin.net> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:34 AM > To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: tursu...@ursulin.net; Ursulin, Tvrtko <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>; Chris > Wilson <ch...@chr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Adjust BSD2 semantics to mean any second VCS instance

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of > Joonas Lahtinen > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 3:43 AM > To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Tvrtko Ursulin > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Adjust

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/8] Force preemption

> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Jeff McGee > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 12:09 PM > To: Tvrtko Ursulin > Cc: Kondapally, Kalyan ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org;

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Engine discovery query

> -Original Message- > From: Tvrtko Ursulin [mailto:tursu...@ursulin.net] > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 7:06 AM > To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: tursu...@ursulin.net; Ursulin, Tvrtko <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>; Chris > Wilson <ch...@chris-wil

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Prevent machine hang from Broxton's vtd w/a and error capture

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Bloomfield, Jon > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 9:01 AM > To: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Daniel Vetter

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Prevent machine hang from Broxton's vtd w/a and error capture

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 7:38 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>; Bloomfield, Jon > <jon.bloomfi...@intel.com>;

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Enable VBT based BL control for DP

> -Original Message- > From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 1:16 AM > To: Deak, Imre <imre.d...@intel.com>; Bloomfield, Jon > <jon.bloomfi...@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Mustaffa,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Enable VBT based BL control for DP

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Imre Deak > Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 5:34 AM > To: Jani Nikula > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Mustaffa, Mustamin B >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Serialize GTT Updates on BXT

> -Original Message- > From: Bloomfield, Jon > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 7:28 AM > To: 'Chris Wilson' <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Serialize GTT Updates on BXT > > > --

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Serialize GTT Updates on BXT

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 1:41 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon <jon.bloomfi...@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Serialize GTT Up

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Serialize GTT Updates on BXT

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 12:33 AM > To: Bloomfield, Jon <jon.bloomfi...@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Serialize GTT Up

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Serialize GTT Updates on BXT

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 1:05 PM > To: Bloomfield, Jon <jon.bloomfi...@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Serialize GTT Updates

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 1/5] drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools

-Original Message- From: Nguyen, Michael H Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:13 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; Brad Volkin Subject: [PATCH v7 1/5] drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/5] drm/i915: Use batch pools with the command parser

-Original Message- From: Nguyen, Michael H Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:13 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; Brad Volkin Subject: [PATCH v7 2/5] drm/i915: Use batch pools with the command parser From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 3/5] drm/i915: Use batch length instead of object size in command parser

-Original Message- From: Nguyen, Michael H Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:13 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; Brad Volkin Subject: [PATCH v7 3/5] drm/i915: Use batch length instead of object size in command parser From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 4/5] drm/i915: Mark shadow batch buffers as purgeable

-Original Message- From: Nguyen, Michael H Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:13 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; Brad Volkin Subject: [PATCH v7 4/5] drm/i915: Mark shadow batch buffers as purgeable From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 5/5] drm/i915: Tidy up execbuffer command parsing code

-Original Message- From: Nguyen, Michael H Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:13 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; Brad Volkin Subject: [PATCH v7 5/5] drm/i915: Tidy up execbuffer command parsing code From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com Move

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/i915: Mark shadow batch buffers as purgeable

-Original Message- From: Nguyen, Michael H Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 10:34 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; Brad Volkin Subject: [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/i915: Mark shadow batch buffers as purgeable From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 5/5] drm/i915: Tidy up execbuffer command parsing code

-Original Message- From: Nguyen, Michael H Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 10:34 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; Brad Volkin Subject: [PATCH v6 5/5] drm/i915: Tidy up execbuffer command parsing code From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol...@intel.com Move

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/5] drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools

-Original Message- From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:18 PM To: Nguyen, Michael H Cc: Brad Volkin; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/5] drm/i915: Implement

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/5] drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools

-Original Message- From: Nguyen, Michael H Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:34 PM To: Bloomfield, Jon Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/5] drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools Hi Jon, On 12/10/2014 03

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/7] drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools

-Original Message- From: Nguyen, Michael H Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 9:54 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; Volkin, Bradley D Subject: [PATCH v5 1/7] drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools From: Brad Volkin bradley.d.vol

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Add MI_SET_APPID cmd to cmd parser tables

-Original Message- From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of michael.h.ngu...@intel.com Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 5:36 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Vetter, Daniel; Barnes, Jesse Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Add

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Revert drm/i915: Reject the pin ioctl on gen6+

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 Daniel Vetter wrote: I still consider pinning stuff behind the kernels back too evil. So if people want that I'd like to see the use-case and why we can't do this differently. And I've never approved of the pin ioctl but really loudly complained about each occasion I've

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Wait for completion of pending flips when starved of fences

-Original Message- From: intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:intel-gfx- boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Chris Wilson Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 10:18 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Wait for completion of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Repeat evictions whilst pageflip completions are outstanding

From: intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:intel-gfx- boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Chris Wilson Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 10:18 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Repeat evictions whilst pageflip completions are

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Introduce vblank work function

What's the status of this patch ? I can't find any subsequent mention of it, but we currently use it in one of our Android development trees. I'm trying to work out whether to retain it or replace it. Was it killed off, or is it still in the pipeline ? Thanks. -Original Message-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Introduce vblank work function

PM To: Bloomfield, Jon Cc: Chris Wilson; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Introduce vblank work function On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:44:15AM +, Bloomfield, Jon wrote: What's the status of this patch ? I can't find any subsequent mention

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/62] drm/i915/bdw: Add GTT functions

-Original Message- From: intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:intel-gfx- boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Ben Widawsky Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 4:07 AM To: Intel GFX Cc: Daniel Vetter; Ben Widawsky; Widawsky, Benjamin Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/62]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait and retry if there is no space in the aperture mappable area

: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 4:57 PM To: Chris Wilson Cc: Bloomfield, Jon; intel-gfx Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait and retry if there is no space in the aperture mappable area Dragging

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait and retry if there is no space in the aperture mappable area

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 01:15:32PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:04:17PM +, Siluvery, Arun wrote: From: Siluvery, Arun arun.siluv...@intel.com When a mapping is requested and if there is no space the mapping fails and the region is not physically backed.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Workaround incoherence between fences and LLC across multiple CPUs

-Original Message- From: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 10:22 PM To: Carsten Emde Cc: Chris Wilson; Jesse Barnes; Intel Graphics Development; Bloomfield, Jon; Steven Rostedt; Christoph Mathys; stable

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Workaround incoherence between fences and LLC across multiple CPUs

-Original Message- From: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 3:38 PM To: Bloomfield, Jon Cc: Carsten Emde; Chris Wilson; Jesse Barnes; Intel Graphics Development; Steven Rostedt; Christoph Mathys; stable