e creative.
Apologies for all the noise... now I'll go make some elsewhere. ;)
U. Artie
> -Original Message-
> From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 12:57 AM
> To: Eoff, Ullysses A; Stéphane Marchesin
> Cc: Jesse Bar
> -Original Message-
> From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 12:58 AM
> To: Eoff, Ullysses A; Stéphane Marchesin
> Cc: Jesse Barnes; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: expose
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikula, Jani
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 3:59 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani; Eoff, Ullysses A
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: avoid round-trip scaling errors in
> actual_brightness
>
> Due to
bump
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Eoff, Ullysses A
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:34 AM
> To: Nikula, Jani; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivi, Rodrigo
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:50 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo; Ben Widawsky; Eoff, Ullysses A
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Force HW context restore on resume.
>
> Using aliasing ppgtt in
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 15:50 -0700, Joe Konno wrote:
> From: Joe Konno
>
> Improper integer division-- truncated rather than rounded-- in the
> scale() function causes actual_brightness != brightness. This (partial)
> work-around should be sufficient for a majority of use-cases, but it is
> by no
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Jani Nikula
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:08 AM
> To: Hans de Goede; Joe Konno; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: intel_backlight sca
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Joe Konno
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:55 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: intel_backlight scale() math WA v2
>
> From: Joe Ko
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Jani Nikula
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 6:07 AM
> To: Joe Konno; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: intel_backlight scale() math WA v2
>
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:31 +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:50:57PM +0000, Eoff, Ullysses A wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Jani Nikula
&g
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 10:04 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:49:32PM -0700, U. Artie Eoff wrote:
> > Improper truncated integer division in the scale() function causes
> > actual_brightness != brightness. This (partial) work-around should be
> > sufficient for a majority of
Ah snap... I forgot the v4 in the subject line :-/
Nonetheless, this is it.
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 08:14 -0700, U. Artie Eoff wrote:
> Improper truncated integer division in the scale() function causes
> actual_brightness != brightness. This (partial) work-around should be
> sufficient for a major
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:32 AM
> To: Eoff, Ullysses A
> Cc: dan...@ffwll.ch; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATC
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:23 AM
> To: Eoff, Ullysses A
> Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2 v3] drm/i91
On 09/24/2014 10:42 AM, Eoff, Ullysses A wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
>> Of Jani Nikula
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:08 AM
>> To: Hans de Goede; Joe Konno; i
Jani/Jesse,
Does this patch look reasonable to you for merging?
-- U. Artie
> -Original Message-
> From: Eoff, Ullysses A
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:31 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Eoff, Ullysses A
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: expose
e for that instead.
U. Artie
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:23 AM
> To: Eoff, Ullysses A
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Jani Nikula
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] d
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Eoff, Ullysses A
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 3:19 PM
> To: Jani Nikula; Jesse Barnes
> Cc: stephane.marche...@gmail.com; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Su
> -Original Message-
> From: Stéphane Marchesin [mailto:stephane.marche...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 3:53 PM
> To: Eoff, Ullysses A
> Cc: Jani Nikula; Jesse Barnes; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: expose
> -Original Message-
> From: intel-gfx-bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel@lists.freedesktop.org
> [mailto:intel-gfx-
> bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Julien Cristau
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:54 PM
> To: Paul Menzel
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.fre
20 matches
Mail list logo
