Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Fix backlight issues on some Windows 8 systems

2013-07-17 Thread Felipe Contreras
.linux.acpi.devel/60969 > So can the previous behavior be actually restored? It *should*. The #1 rule of the Linux kernel is to never ever break user-space, isn't it? > Please keep me on CC: on replies, I'm not subscribed to the various > lis

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Update][PATCH 0/3] Fix backlight issues on some Windows 8 systems

2013-07-21 Thread Felipe Contreras
acpi_backlight=vendor, and the intel backlight driver doesn't work correctly in this machine. If you are actually serious about the mantra of "no user-space regressions", then for this machine at least, you need to use the ACPI backlight with Windows8 OSI disabled, until the intel backl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Update][PATCH 0/3] Fix backlight issues on some Windows 8 systems

2013-08-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I tried this patch series and it's as I expected, it's the same as >> acpi_backlight=vendor, and the intel backlight driver doesn't work >> correctly

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 backlight

2013-08-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
pretty obvious that for the time being we need to blacklist a ton of machines so they boot without this OSI. In fact, in might make sense to simply remove the OSI completely for all machines (for now). -- Felipe Contreras ___ Intel-gfx mai

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 backlight

2013-08-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, August 02, 2013 01:48:37 AM Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Josep Lladonosa wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I am using a Lenovo Edge E530 and, with kernel 3.11

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 backlight

2013-08-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
reasing), as if it didn't remember previous value to > standby mode. > > This was something that before didn't happen. You mean with acpi_osi="!Windows 2012"? And when you say "before", what do you mean? -- Felipe Contreras _

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 backlight

2013-08-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
not checked this issue with acpi_osi="!Windows 2012". Please do. -- Felipe Contreras ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 backlight

2013-08-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, August 02, 2013 01:58:55 PM Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > On Friday, August 02, 2013 01:48:37 AM Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> I thin

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: avoid negative timeouts

2013-10-03 Thread Felipe Contreras
It's nice to avoid X server crashes (by not passing negative values to select(3)). For more information: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.devel/37388 Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- src/sna/sna_accel.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/sr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: avoid negative timeouts

2013-10-03 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:29:29AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> It's nice to avoid X server crashes (by not passing negative values to >> select(3)). >> >> For more informat

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: avoid negative timeouts

2013-10-03 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:06:03AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:29:29AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> It&

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: avoid negative timeouts

2013-10-03 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:09:32AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > That will hopefully catch which path is consuming too much time >> >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: avoid negative timeouts

2013-10-03 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:09:32AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> O