On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 23:59 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On February 28, 2022 10:42:53 PM GMT+02:00, James Bottomley <
> james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 21:07 +0100, Christian König wrote:
[...]
> > > > I do wish we coul
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 21:56 +0100, Christian König wrote:
>
> Am 28.02.22 um 21:42 schrieb James Bottomley:
> > On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 21:07 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 28.02.22 um 20:56 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:19
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 21:07 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 28.02.22 um 20:56 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:19 AM Christian König
> > wrote:
> > > I don't think that using the extra variable makes the code in any
> > > way
> > > more reliable or easier to read.
> > So I
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 15:28 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 08:26:16PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Just as a side note. I was looking at tpm_tis_probe_irq_single()
> > and that function is leaking the interrupt request if any of the
> > checks afterwards fails, except
On Sun, 2020-12-06 at 17:40 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05 2020 at 12:39, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:43:37PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > To try and detect potential interrupt storms that
> > > have been occurring with tpm_tis devices it was
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 13:32 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 08:31:30AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Really, no ... something which produces no improvement has no value
> > at all ... we really shouldn't be wasting maintainer time with it
> > because i
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 19:56 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:58 PM James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > Well, I used git. It says that as of today in Linus' tree we have
> > 889 patches related to fall throughs and the first series went in
> > in october 20
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 07:03 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:53:55AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 11:22 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 11:12 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Sun,
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 15:19 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > Well, it seems to be three years of someone's time plus the
> > maintainer review time and series disruption of nearly a thousand
> > patches. Let's be
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 09:54 +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> But is anyone keeping score of the regressions? If unreported bugs
> count, what about unreported regressions?
Well, I was curious about the former (obviously no tool will tell me
about the latter), so I asked git what patches had a
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 21:35 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 7:22 PM James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > Well, it's a problem in an error leg, sure, but it's not a really
> > compelling reason for a 141 patch series, is it? All that fixing
> > this error w
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 11:22 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 11:12 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 10:21 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > Please tell me our re
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 10:21 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Please tell me our reward for all this effort isn't a single
> > missing error print.
>
> There were quite literally dozens of logical defects found
> by t
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:17 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:30:40 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A.
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:10 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/22/20 6:56 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 06:46:46AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > On 11/21/20 7:23 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 08:50:58AM -0800, t...@redhat.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem
> preamble in the commit log. For the ongoing effort of a fixer
> producing
> one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem
> appropriate.
>
> It would
On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 14:34 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 12:49:57PM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ira Weiny
> >
> > The kmap() calls in this FS are localized to a single thread. To
> > avoid the over head of global PKRS updates use the new
> > kmap_thread()
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 21:54 +0530, Allen wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Since both threads seem to have petered out, let me suggest in
> > > > kernel.h:
> > > >
> > > > #define cast_out(ptr, container, member) \
> > > > container_of(ptr, typeof(*container), member)
> > > >
> > > > It does what you
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 07:00 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/18/20 1:00 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
[...]
> > Since both threads seem to have petered out, let me suggest in
> > kernel.h:
> >
> > #define cast_out(ptr, container, member) \
> > container_o
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 13:10 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:00:33PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 13:02 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 8/17/20 12:48 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:4
On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 13:02 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/17/20 12:48 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:44:34PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 8/17/20 12:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 06:56:47AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > On 8/17/20 2:15 AM,
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 23:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> Souza, Jose schreef op di 16-07-2019 om 16:32 [+]:
> > Paul and James could you test this final solution(at least for
> > 5.2)? Please revert the hack patch and apply this one.
>
> I've just reached a day of uptime with your
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 16:40 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 23:28 +, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 01:03 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > James Bottomley schreef op do 11-07-2019 om 15:38 [-0700]:
> > > > On Thu, 2019-07-11 at
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 23:28 +, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 01:03 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > James Bottomley schreef op do 11-07-2019 om 15:38 [-0700]:
> > > On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 22:26 +, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > > > It eventually comes back f
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 22:26 +, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 14:57 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 13:28 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > I've also updated to the released 5.2 kernel and am running with
> > > the
> >
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 20:25 +, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 13:11 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 10:29 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Quoting James Bottomley (2019-06-29 19:56:52)
> > > > The symptoms are really wei
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 10:29 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting James Bottomley (2019-06-29 19:56:52)
> > The symptoms are really weird: the screen image is locked in
> > place. The machine is still functional and if I log in over the
> > network can do anything I like, in
On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 23:59 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> James Bottomley schreef op wo 10-07-2019 om 10:35 [-0700]:
> > I can get back to it this afternoon, when I'm done with the meeting
> > requirements and doing other dev stuff.
>
> I've started bisecting using your suggest
On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 18:45 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> James Bottomley schreef op wo 10-07-2019 om 09:32 [-0700]:
> > You seem to be getting it to happen much more often than I can.
> > Last
> > night, on the below pull request it took me a good hour to see the
> >
On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 18:16 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> James Bottomley schreef op wo 10-07-2019 om 08:01 [-0700]:
> > I've confirmed that 5.1 doesn't have the regression and I'm now
> > trying to bisect the 5.2 merge window, but since the problem takes
> >
On Sat, 2019-06-29 at 11:56 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> The symptoms are really weird: the screen image is locked in place.
> The machine is still functional and if I log in over the network I
> can do anything I like, including killing the X server and the
> display will
The symptoms are really weird: the screen image is locked in place.
The machine is still functional and if I log in over the network I can
do anything I like, including killing the X server and the display will
never alter. It also seems that the system is accepting keyboard input
because when
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 08:09 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 13:35 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Hi! James & Paulo: What's the current status of this?
>
> No, the only interaction has been the suggestion below for a revert,
> which
> asking, because this issue is on the list of regressions for 4.8.
I'm just about to try out -rc7, but it's not fixed so far.
James
> Ciao, Thorsten
>
> On 01.09.2016 00:25, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 21:51 +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> > &
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 21:51 +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> Hi
>
> Em Qua, 2016-08-31 às 14:43 -0700, James Bottomley escreveu:
> > On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 11:23 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 09:10 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 11:23 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 09:10 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > We seem to have an xrandr regression with skylake now. What's
> > happening is that I can get output on to a projector, but the
> > system is losin
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 09:10 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> We seem to have an xrandr regression with skylake now. What's
> happening is that I can get output on to a projector, but the system
> is losing video when I change the xrandr sessions (like going from a
> --above b to a
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 09:10 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> We seem to have an xrandr regression with skylake now. What's
> happening is that I can get output on to a projector, but the system
> is losing video when I change the xrandr sessions (like going from a
> --above b to a
We seem to have an xrandr regression with skylake now. What's
happening is that I can get output on to a projector, but the system is
losing video when I change the xrandr sessions (like going from a -
-above b to a --same-as b). The main screen goes blank, which is
basically a reboot situation.
vswing for eDP, whereas the VBT panel type (2) tells us to use normal
> vswing. The problem is that low vswing results in some display
> flickers.
> Since no one seems to know how this stuff is supposed to be handled,
> let's just ignore the OpRegion panel type on SKL for no
On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 13:19 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:19:36PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 09:55 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 19:14 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Ju
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 09:55 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 19:14 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:44:34PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:53:15AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 19:14 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:44:34PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:53:15AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 11:03 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > Cc: Vil
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 17:00 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 18:44 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:53:15AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 11:03 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > Cc: Ville
&
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 18:44 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:53:15AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 11:03 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > Cc: Ville
> > >
> > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, James Bottomley <
>
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:06 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:34 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:42:12PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On T
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:34 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:42:12PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 14:29 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Th
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:34 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:42:12PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 14:29 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Th
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 14:29 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 23:24 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > I guess we'll need the bisect on this one to make progress.
>
> Sigh, I was afraid that might be the next step.
OK, I have a curious data point. I assumed th
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 23:24 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:15 PM, James Bottomley
> <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 13:14 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Tue, 31 May 2016, James Bot
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 13:14 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2016, James Bottomley <
> james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 10:51 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 May 2016, James Bottomley <
> > > james
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 10:51 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016, James Bottomley <
> james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > I've tested a pristine 4.6.0 system, so it's definitely something
> > that
> > went in during the merge window. The flic
I've tested a pristine 4.6.0 system, so it's definitely something that
went in during the merge window. The flicker isn't continuous, it's
periodic, with an interval of something like 2-5 seconds. It looks
like an old analogue TV going out of sync and then resyncing. I've
attached the dmesg and
With kernel 4.3.x (tested x=2,3) the screen goes blank as soon as the
system boots (both for VGA console and graphics). The only way to get
it to turn on is to suspend and resume the system.
The system is a Dell XPS 13 (latest rev) running OpenSuse Leap 42.1 and
this is the lspci output:
54 matches
Mail list logo
