we're
>>> dealing with a real struct device.
>>> - Better decoupling between gfx and audio side since registration is done
>>> at runtime.
>>> - We can attach drv private date which the audio driver needs.
>
> I think this would be another case where the
g on for the imx driver. Or maybe we need to hand-roll our own
>>> notification scheme.
>>>>
>>>> On a hunch it's probably best if the gfx side registers this device
>>>> (since it also owns the output state in general) and that the audio
>>>
Date 13.5.2013 10:59, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 13 May 2013 10:55:46 +0200,
> Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
>>
>> Date 13.5.2013 10:28, David Henningsson wrote:
>>> On 05/13/2013 09:37 AM, Wang Xingchao wrote:
>>>> I915 module maybe loaded after snd_hda_intel, t
ase and
unregister it when snd-hda-intel is unloaded. This cross module loading
dependency looks really bad. Or it is not allowed to load the audio
driver later than DRM one?
Jaroslav
--
Jaroslav Kysela
Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer
ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
