Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_cansleep()

2023-11-23 Thread Lee Jones
pwm-beeper.c | 4 +-- > drivers/input/misc/pwm-vibra.c| 8 +++--- > drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 2 +- > drivers/leds/rgb/leds-pwm-multicolor.c| 4 +-- Acked-by: Lee Jones > drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/i915_scatterlist: Fix kerneldoc formatting issue - missing '@'

2023-04-05 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 05 Apr 2023, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 03 Apr 2023, Lee Jones wrote: > >> > On Mon, 03 Apr 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> > > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/i915_scatterlist: Fix kerneldoc formatting issue - missing '@'

2023-04-05 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 03 Apr 2023, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Apr 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023, Lee Jones wrote: > >> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): > >> > > >&g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/i915_scatterlist: Fix kerneldoc formatting issue - missing '@'

2023-04-03 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 31 Mar 2023, Lee Jones wrote: > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.c:62: warning: Function parameter or > > member 'size' not described in 'i915_refct

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create: Provide the function names for proper kerneldoc headers

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Matthew Auld Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait: Provide function name to validate the kerneldoc header

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Sumit Semwal Cc: "Christian König" Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-me...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/dr

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/intel_region_ttm: Provide missing description for 'offset' param

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c index

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/gt/intel_rps: Demote a kerneldoc abuse for ips_ping_for_i915_load()

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/display/intel_wm: Fix a little doc-rot in intel_update_watermarks()

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
in 'intel_update_watermarks' Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: "Ville Syrjälä" Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/inte

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/display/intel_display_power: Fix incorrectly documented function __intel_display_power_put_async()

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Imre Deak Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/i915_scatterlist: Fix kerneldoc formatting issue - missing '@'

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.c index

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/i915_gem: Provide function names to complete the expected kerneldoc format

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 35950fa914068..6a00d13db2893 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain: Provide function names to complete proper kerneldoc

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
: Jani Nikula Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c | 14 +- 1 file changed, 9

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs: Fix a couple of incorrectly named functions

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
for intel_engines_cleanup_common(). Prototype was for intel_engine_cleanup_common() instead Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move: Provide a couple of missing descriptions for 'num_pages' and 'ctx'

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c index d030182ca1764..dd188dfcc423e 100644 --- a/d

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object: Demote non-kerneldoc header with no param descriptions

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
: Daniel Vetter Cc: Sumit Semwal Cc: "Christian König" Cc: Matthew Auld Cc: Nirmoy Das Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-me...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_ge

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/i915_vma: Provide one missing param and demote another non-kerneldoc header

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c index f51fd9fd4c89c..20a44788999e5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c +++ b/drivers/gp

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm: Demote half-filled kerneldoc

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-me...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_ge

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs: Fix incorrect param naming for 'intel_connector'

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
function parameter 'connector' description in 'intel_connector_debugfs_add' Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_pm: Provide a couple of missing descriptions for 'flags' and remove some superfluous ones

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_pm.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_pm.c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig: Demote a few non-conforming kerneldoc headers

2023-03-31 Thread Lee Jones
in 'intel_gt_fini_hwconfig' Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: John Harrison Cc: Matt Roper Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/29] [Set 15] Finally rid W=1 warnings from GPU!

2021-01-20 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, Zack Rusin wrote: > > > > On Jan 19, 2021, at 03:29, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:09:45PM +, Lee Jones wrote: > >>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Dani

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/29] [Set 15] Finally rid W=1 warnings from GPU!

2021-01-19 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:09:45PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 06:27:15PM +, Zack Rusin wrote: > > > > > > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/29] [Set 15] Finally rid W=1 warnings from GPU!

2021-01-18 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 06:27:15PM +, Zack Rusin wrote: > > > > > On Jan 15, 2021, at 13:15, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > kern

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/29] drm/i915/gvt/handlers: Remove kernel-doc formatting from non-kernel-doc header

2021-01-15 Thread Lee Jones
...@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c index eaba80975f42a..0d124ced5f940 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/29] [Set 15] Finally rid W=1 warnings from GPU!

2021-01-15 Thread Lee Jones
This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings. Last set! All clean after this for; Arm, Arm64, PPC, MIPS and x86. Lee Jones (29): drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_cmdbuf: Fix misnaming of 'headers' should

Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch 16/30] mfd: ab8500-debugfs: Remove the racy fiddling with irq_desc

2020-12-11 Thread Lee Jones
ed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Linus Walleij > Cc: Lee Jones > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > --- > drivers/mfd/ab8500-debugfs.c | 16 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) Acked-by: Lee Jones -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Tec

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64

2020-04-27 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 07:43:03AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > A great deal of mailing lists contain numerous protections against > > things like flooding and spamming. One of those protections is a > > check for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64

2020-04-24 Thread Lee Jones
Cc: Allison Randal > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > Cc: Atish Patra > Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai > Cc: Chris Wilson > Cc: Dan Carpenter > Cc: Daniel Thompson > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: David Airlie > Cc: David Collins > Cc: dri-de...@lists.free

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64

2020-04-24 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:48:57PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > What's the merge plan for this set? > > I'm not sure what you mean. My assumption is that first all the patches > need to get an Acked-by and only then will the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64

2020-04-24 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:48:57PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > What's the merge plan for this set? > > I'm not sure what you mean. My assumption is that first all the patches > need to get an Acked-by and only then will the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64

2020-04-23 Thread Lee Jones
od shape and there are no compilation errors. What's the merge plan for this set? FYI, it's better to send all patches to all parties. That way maintainers and interested persons can follow the discussion and progress, or lack there of. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight

2019-12-18 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Lee Jones wrote: > > Hans was making the case that this was impractical for DRM, due to the > > amount of churn you guys receive, hence the discussion. I'm very > > pleased that this is not the case. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight

2019-12-17 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Doing immutable branches assumes that there is a base point, > >> e.g. 5

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight

2019-12-17 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 16-12-2019 10:30, Lee Jones wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which use a Crystal Cove PMIC, yet the LCD is connected > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/dsi: Move Crystal Cove PMIC panel GPIO lookup from mfd to the i915 driver

2019-12-17 Thread Lee Jones
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 23 +++- > drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c| 19 > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) Acked-by: Lee Jones -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Lin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight

2019-12-17 Thread Lee Jones
t, instead of > the i915 driver relying on a "pwm_backlight" lookup getting registered > which magically points to the right controller. > > Acked-by: Jani Nikula > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > --- > drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_co

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/dsi: Control panel and backlight enable GPIOs from VBT

2019-12-16 Thread Lee Jones
ging MFD and DRM on more active files? Then I will have to insist on an immutable branch. So it would be better for the DRM tree to be able to handle that use-case sooner rather than later, regardless of who has the most churn. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Op

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight

2019-12-16 Thread Lee Jones
say, "sure, take it" and the chances are everything could be fine from a technical perspective. However, I'm taking exception to the fact you think this series is *special* enough to warrant circumventing the usual way in which we usually work when dealing with cross-subsystem patch-sets. S

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight

2019-12-13 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 12-12-2019 16:52, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 12-12-2019 09:45, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Wed,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight

2019-12-12 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 12-12-2019 09:45, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > > > On 10-12-2019 09:51, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight

2019-12-12 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On 10-12-2019 09:51, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > > At least Bay Trail (BYT) and Cherry Trail (CHT) devices can use 1 of 2 > > > different PWM controll

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight

2019-12-10 Thread Lee Jones
t, instead of > the i915 driver relying on a "pwm_backlight" lookup getting registered > which magically points to the right controller. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > --- > drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-18 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:03:47AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > > > Op 14-06-2019 om 11:25 schreef Maarten Lankhorst: > > > > Hi all, > > > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-18 Thread Lee Jones
eofb.c | 9 +- > > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-sysfs.c | 21 +- > > drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c | 25 -- > > drivers/video/fbdev/savage/savagefb_driver.c| 9 +- > > drivers/video/fbdev/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.c | 132 +--- > > drivers/video/fbdev/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.h | 5 - > > include/linux/console_struct.h | 5 +- > > include/linux/fb.h | 45 +-- > > include/linux/fbcon.h | 30 ++ > > 27 files changed, 396 insertions(+), 782 deletions(-) > > -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/33] fbcon notifier begone v3!

2019-06-12 Thread Lee Jones
o drm.git somehow, I guess topic branch works > > > too. > > > > I would like to have topic branch for this patchset. > > From a backlight perspective its Lee Jones who hoovers up the patches > and worries about hiding merge conflicts from Linus. > > I'll let him fo

[Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between MFD and DRM/i915, Media and Platform due for the v4.19 merge window

2018-07-13 Thread Lee Jones
+++ include/media/cec-notifier.h | 27 +- 14 files changed, 578 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/cros-ec-cec/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/cros-ec-cec/cros-ec-cec.c -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 3/6] mfd: cros-ec: Increase maximum mkbp event size

2018-07-12 Thread Lee Jones
16 + > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) For my own reference: Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog __

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 0/6] Add ChromeOS EC CEC Support

2018-07-12 Thread Lee Jones
t; drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 40 ++- > include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 2 +- > include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h | 97 +++ > include/media/cec-notifier.h | 27 +- > 14 files changed, 578 inser

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 5/6] mfd: cros_ec_dev: Add CEC sub-device registration

2018-07-04 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 04 Jul 2018, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On 04/07/2018 09:47, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > >> The EC can expose a CEC bus, thus add the cros-ec-cec MFD sub-device > >> when the CEC feature bit is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 5/6] mfd: cros_ec_dev: Add CEC sub-device registration

2018-07-04 Thread Lee Jones
s/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c | 16 > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) For my own reference: Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog __

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 3/6] mfd: cros-ec: Increase maximum mkbp event size

2018-07-03 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On 18/06/2018 09:44, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > > >> Having a 16 byte mkbp event size makes it possible to send CEC > >> messages from the EC to the AP dire

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 4/6] mfd: cros-ec: Introduce CEC commands and events definitions.

2018-06-18 Thread Lee Jones
> include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h | 81 > > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) For my own reference: Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Lin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 3/6] mfd: cros-ec: Increase maximum mkbp event size

2018-06-18 Thread Lee Jones
es in here. > +} __packed; How come these guys have kerneldoc headers? > struct ec_response_get_next_event { > uint8_t event_type; > /* Followed by event data if any */ > union ec_response_get_next_data data; > } __p

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/6] Add ChromeOS EC CEC Support

2018-06-11 Thread Lee Jones
hes 1+2 can just go to the i915 tree. The i915 driver changes > often, > so going through that tree makes sense. The cec-notifier code is unlikely to > change, > and I am fine with that patch going through i915. > > > for media to merge the mfd branch + patch 7 ? > > Patc

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V3 24/29] backlight: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

2017-11-28 Thread Lee Jones
t; > struct pci_dev *host; > > int intensity; > > > > - host = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 0); > > + host = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, 0); > > > > if (!host) { > > pr_err("unable to find PCI host\n"); &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Terminate panel control GPIO lookup table correctly

2016-05-09 Thread Lee Jones
...@intel.com> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnu...@gmail.com> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@gmail.com> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > Cc: sta...@vger

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Terminate panel control GPIO lookup table correctly

2016-05-09 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 09 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:32:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 02 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:31:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:38

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Terminate panel control GPIO lookup table correctly

2016-05-04 Thread Lee Jones
; Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> > > > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnu...@gmail.com> > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@gmail.com> > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 03/46] backlight: lm3630a_bl: stop messing with the pwm->period field

2016-04-13 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:16:13PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:26PM +

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 03/46] backlight: lm3630a_bl: stop messing with the pwm->period field

2016-04-13 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:16:13PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:26PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > pwm->period field is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period()

2016-04-12 Thread Lee Jones
; > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > --- > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Applied, thanks. Applied?

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 03/46] backlight: lm3630a_bl: stop messing with the pwm->period field

2016-04-12 Thread Lee Jones
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> > > --- > > drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Applied, thanks. Applied? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mfd: Add GPIOLIB dependency if INTEL_SOC_PMIC is to be enabled

2015-07-23 Thread Lee Jones
On some Intel SoC platforms, the panel enable/disable signals are controlled by CRC PMIC. Add those control as a new GPIO in a lookup table for gpio-crystalcove chip during CRC driver load Cc: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org Cc: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org Signed-off

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mfd: Add GPIOLIB dependency if INTEL_SOC_PMIC is to be enabled

2015-07-23 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:01:44PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: This is needed as the CRC PMIC has support for Panel enable/diable

Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3 1/7] gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table

2015-07-01 Thread Lee Jones
Kumar shobhit.ku...@intel.com --- v2: Ccing maintainers v3: Correct the subject line (Lee jones) Acked-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 13 + include/linux/gpio/machine.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpio

Re: [Intel-gfx] [v2 4/7] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: ADD PWM lookup table for CRC PMIC based PWM

2015-06-23 Thread Lee Jones
by the consumer (Intel GFX) v2: Remove the lookup table on driver unload (Thierry) v3: Correct the subject line (Lee jones) This part should only describe what this is about.. Don't put this patch change history over here. Include this change history after ... Signed-off-by: Author

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table

2015-05-07 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: This is not how we submit subsequent patch-sets. It is unfortunately how we handle patches on dri-develintel-gfx to be able to cope with massive mail load. If everyone who submits to intel

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drivers/mfd: ADD PWM lookup table for CRC PMIC based PWM

2015-05-05 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Shobhit Kumar wrote: On 04/29/2015 07:54 PM, Lee Jones wrote: On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Shobhit Kumar wrote: On some BYT PLatform the PWM is controlled using CRC PMIC. Add a lookup entry for the same to be used by the consumer (Intel GFX) v2: Remove the lookup table

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table

2015-05-05 Thread Lee Jones
in multiple entries. Provide an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload v2: Ccing maintainers v3: Correct the subject line (Lee jones) Change logs should go underneth the '---' and above the diffstat found below. Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com Cc: Linus Walleij linus.wall

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drivers/mfd: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO signal

2015-04-29 Thread Lee Jones
); return 0; -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drivers/mfd: ADD PWM lookup table for CRC PMIC based PWM

2015-04-29 Thread Lee Jones
? Acked-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c index f3d918e..a00ddd9 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include linux/regmap.h #include linux

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drivers/mfd: Add PWM cell device for Crystalcove PMIC

2015-04-29 Thread Lee Jones
shobhit.ku...@intel.com --- drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) For my own reference: Acked-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c index 4cc1b32..8839e25 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drivers/mfd: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO signal

2015-04-29 Thread Lee Jones
/intel_soc_pmic_core.c | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) I have no idea what this stuff is, but it looks plausible. For my own reference: Acked-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c index 7b50b6b