[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] blacklist: Don't run DRRS test on Intel CI system

2018-03-29 Thread Marta Lofstedt
the Bugzilla below. V2: Changed typo and added comment. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105617 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] test/gem_ctx_param - Use the last I915_CONTEXT_PARAM+1 for invalid tests

2018-01-11 Thread Marta Lofstedt
/show_bug.cgi?id=103107 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/gem_ctx_param.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_param.c b/tests/gem_ctx_param.c index c20ae1ee..75d2a20f 100644 --- a/tests/gem_ctx_param.c +++ b

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] test/kms_psr_sink : HACK run psr_drrs on BAT

2018-01-05 Thread Marta Lofstedt
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 575 +- 1 file changed, 288 insertions(+), 287 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/intel-c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - subtests psr_basic and psr_drrs need test cleanup

2018-01-05 Thread Marta Lofstedt
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c index 83a69f0b..26cf434a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - subtests psr_basic and psr_drrs need test cleanup

2018-01-04 Thread Marta Lofstedt
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c index 83a69f0b..26cf434a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_psr_sink : HACK test if psr_drrs also need test_cleanup

2018-01-04 Thread Marta Lofstedt
See previous PW: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36000/ Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 575 +- 1 file change

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - Hack to test test_cleanup() for psr_basic

2018-01-04 Thread Marta Lofstedt
lla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c index 83a69f0b..7ee4c2f4 100644 --- a/tests/km

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/2] HACK to get kms_sysfs_edid_timing run on more machines

2017-12-15 Thread Marta Lofstedt
Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist index f71a16bc..a6c3f614 100644 --- a/tests

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2 0/2] kms_sysfs_edid timing and hack to run for BAT

2017-12-15 Thread Marta Lofstedt
It is possoble to get very mysterious results from kms_sysfs_edid timing Since there is no try-bot for IGT I am using IGT PW to get more data. Marta Lofstedt (2): test/kms_sysfs_edid_timing : Increase THRESHOLD_PER_CONNECTOR and THRESHOLD_TOTAL HACK to get kms_sysfs_edid_timing run

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2 1/2] test/kms_sysfs_edid_timing : Increase THRESHOLD_PER_CONNECTOR and THRESHOLD_TOTAL

2017-12-15 Thread Marta Lofstedt
anomalies in edid timings, but with the current tight thresholds we are hitting the issues too often. V2: increased thresholds further after patchwork results. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100047 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> ---

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2 0/2] kms_sysfs_edid timing and hack to run for BAT

2017-12-15 Thread Marta Lofstedt
It is possoble to get very mysterious results from kms_sysfs_edid timing Since there is no try-bot for IGT I am using IGT PW to get more data. Marta Lofstedt (2): test/kms_sysfs_edid_timing : Increase THRESHOLD_PER_CONNECTOR and THRESHOLD_TOTAL HACK to get kms_sysfs_edid_timing run

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_sysfs_edid_timing : Increase THRESHOLD_PER_CONNECTOR and THRESHOLD_TOTAL

2017-12-14 Thread Marta Lofstedt
anomalies in edid timings, but with the current tight thresholds we are hitting the issues too often. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100047 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/kms_sysfs_edid_timing.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_rotation_crc : Remove flip tests for sprite plane

2017-09-19 Thread Marta Lofstedt
should be removed. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102691 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c index 21e264ad..06

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE

2017-09-08 Thread Marta Lofstedt
/show_bug.cgi?id=102243 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE

2017-09-08 Thread Marta Lofstedt
and having FCLK_DONE at a randome time after. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102243 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/dr

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_atomic: subtest atomic_invalid_params requires CRTC

2017-08-29 Thread Marta Lofstedt
Check for valid crtc is missing in igt@kms_atomic@atomic_invalid_params. This leads to segfault on machines where the subtest should be skipped. Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/kms_atomic.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tests/kms_at

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Beef up of Beef up the IPS vs. CRC workaround

2017-08-28 Thread Marta Lofstedt
bug.cgi?id=101664 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c index 4e22bb927fed..96043a51c1bf 100644 --- a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Beef up of Beef up the IPS vs. CRC workaround

2017-08-28 Thread Marta Lofstedt
Commit 6e644626945c7c1a7f4d4f83b806b898297846d0 was supposed to solve below bug. However, the patch I tested is not the same as the one that got merged. With this addition the test pass. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101664 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lo

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

2017-08-25 Thread Marta Lofstedt
typically blt vs. mmap_cpu. The objective of the FBC part of the tests is not to benchmark draw domain changes, it is to check that FBC was (re-)enabled. V2: Added documentation Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> Ack

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

2017-06-28 Thread Marta Lofstedt
bug.cgi?id=101623 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c index c24e4a81..8bec5d5a 10

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial_state: Add a test to capture the state of the GPU

2017-05-12 Thread Marta Lofstedt
When running testlist for CI iot would be good to know if the state of the GPU is as expected. This adds a subtest to check if the GPU is wedged. Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/Makefile.sources| 1 + tests/initial_state.c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/meta_test: Fix dmesg-warn test

2017-04-25 Thread Marta Lofstedt
Add bracket to match with piglit dmesg filter. Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/meta_test.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/meta_test.c b/tests/meta_test.c index e09efba0..c02cf8bc 100644 --- a/tests/meta_

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/meta_test: Add a meta test for sanity checks of CI systems

2017-04-19 Thread Marta Lofstedt
From: Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> The intention of this test is use it to test that the CI system that runs IGT is collecting the results correctly. For: VIZ-10281 v2: minor edits Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/meta_test: Add a meta test for sanity checks of CI systems

2017-04-05 Thread Marta Lofstedt
The intention of this test is use it to test that the CI system that runs IGT is collecting the results correctly. For: VIZ-10281 Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/Makefile.sources | 1 + tests/intel-ci/meta.testlist | 7 +++ tests/meta_

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC i-g-t] igt: Add a dpms property test

2016-12-07 Thread Marta Lofstedt
This testcase will set the dpms drm property to DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON and DPMS_MODE_OFF and check that the property values was updated and that the new state corresponds to the crtc active property. Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> --- tests/Makefile.sources | 1 +