[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm: drm_vblank_cleanup: WARN when refcount > 0

2017-11-26 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Warn when refcount is > 0 in drm_vblank_cleanup. Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> --- Changes in v4: * Print refcount value. Changes in v3: * Dropped i915 patch that is used for testing this. No changes in v2. drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 8 ++

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] Test case for drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch

2017-11-01 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Hi Daniel, On 1 November 2017 at 14:23, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:48:28AM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On 31 October 2017 at 21:57, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: >> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] Test case for drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch

2017-10-31 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Hi Daniel, On 31 October 2017 at 21:57, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:37:21PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: >> My patch is supposed to catch problem with drivers. It warns when >> vblank refcount is non-zero in drm_vblank_clea

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] Test case for drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch

2017-10-31 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Hi Daniel, On 31 October 2017 at 15:51, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 06:01:12PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On 30 October 2017 at 15:40, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] Test case for drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch

2017-10-30 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Hi Daniel, On 30 October 2017 at 15:40, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 08:44:45PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> On 24 October 2017 at 22:18, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan >> <prasannatsmku...@gmail.co

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm: drm_vblank_cleanup: WARN when refcount > 0

2017-10-25 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Hi Chris, Sorry I missed adding you in to list while sending the vblank refcount patch. Hope you saw that. On 25-Oct-2017 9:55 PM, "PrasannaKumar Muralidharan" < prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> wrote: Warn when refcount > 0 in drm_vblank_cleanup. Signed-off-by: Prasann

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm: drm_vblank_cleanup: WARN when refcount > 0

2017-10-25 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Warn when refcount > 0 in drm_vblank_cleanup. Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> --- Changes in v3: * Dropped i915 patch that is used for testing this. No changes in v2. drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] Test case for drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch

2017-10-25 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Hi All, On 24 October 2017 at 22:18, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> wrote: > In i915 driver unload drm_vblank_get is added to test whether > drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch is working. > > Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasa

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] Test case for drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch

2017-10-24 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
In i915 driver unload drm_vblank_get is added to test whether drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch is working. Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> --- Changes in v2: Use drm_crtc_vblank_get instead of _put. In previous patch _put was wrongl

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm: drm_vblank_cleanup: WARN when refcount > 0

2017-10-24 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Warn when refcount > 0 in drm_vblank_cleanup. Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> --- No change in v2. drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c inde

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] Test case for drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch

2017-10-12 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
In i915 driver unload drm_vblank_get is added to test whether drm_vblank_cleanup refcount validation patch is working. Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> --- Changes since RFC: Fix compile error drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 7 +++ 1 file chan

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: drm_vblank_cleanup: WARN when refcount > 0

2017-10-12 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Warn when refcount > 0 in drm_vblank_cleanup. Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> --- Changes since RFC: Fix compile error drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/driver

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: drm_vblank_cleanup: WARN when refcount is more than 0

2017-10-12 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Hi Ville, On 12 October 2017 at 22:52, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:30:06PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: >> Warn when refcount > 0 in drm_vblank_cleanup. >> >> In i915 driver unload drm_vblank_get is ad

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: drm_vblank_cleanup: WARN when refcount is more than 0

2017-10-12 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Hi Chris, On 12 October 2017 at 22:37, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > Quoting PrasannaKumar Muralidharan (2017-10-12 18:00:06) >> Warn when refcount > 0 in drm_vblank_cleanup. >> >> In i915 driver unload drm_vblank_get is added to test wh

[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: drm_vblank_cleanup: WARN when refcount is more than 0

2017-10-12 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Warn when refcount > 0 in drm_vblank_cleanup. In i915 driver unload drm_vblank_get is added to test whether this patch is working. This will be removed once the patch gets tested. Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank