[PATCH v10 1/6] pwm: Rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()

pwm_apply_state(), a following commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Acked-by: Mark Brown Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov # for input Acked-by: Hans de Goede Acked-by: Jani Nikula Acked-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Sean Young

[PATCH v9 1/6] pwm: Rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()

pwm_apply_state(), a following commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Acked-by: Mark Brown Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov # for input Acked-by: Hans de Goede Acked-by: Jani Nikula Acked-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Sean Young

[PATCH v8 1/6] pwm: Rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()

pwm_apply_state(), a following commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov # for input Acked-by: Hans de Goede Acked-by: Jani Nikula Acked-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Sean Young --- Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst | 8 +++--- MAINTAINERS

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()

On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 02:57:42PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:13:34AM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > > In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context, > > we will need two functions for applying pwm changes: > > > >

[PATCH v7 1/4] pwm: Rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()

pwm_apply_state(), a following commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov # for input Acked-by: Hans de Goede Acked-by: Jani Nikula Acked-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Sean Young --- Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst | 8 +++--- MAINTAINERS

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()

pwm_apply_state(), a following commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. Acked-by: Hans de Goede Acked-by: Jani Nikula Acked-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Sean Young --- Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst | 8 +++--- .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c| 6

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_cansleep()

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 02:31:18PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 04:16:17PM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > > In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context, > > we will need two functions for applying pwm changes: > > > >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_cansleep()

pwm_apply_state(), a following commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. Acked-by: Hans de Goede Acked-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Sean Young --- Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst | 8 +++--- .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c| 6 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_cansleep()

pwm_apply_state(), a following commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. Acked-by: Hans de Goede Acked-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Sean Young --- Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst | 8 +++--- .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c| 6 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] pwm: make it possible to apply pwm changes in atomic context

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 02:34:17PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 11:08:22AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > On 10/19/23 12:51, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 18,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] pwm: make it possible to apply pwm changes in atomic context

Hi Hans, On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 11:08:22AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 10/19/23 12:51, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 03:57:48PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> On 10/17/23 11:17, Sean Young wrote: > >>> Some drivers require sleeping,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] pwm: make it possible to apply pwm changes in atomic context

the pwm_can_sleep() function. Signed-off-by: Sean Young --- Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst | 16 +++- .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c| 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x.c | 2 +- drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 8 +- drivers/input/misc/da7280

Re: [Intel-gfx] Issue with cec_register_adapter calling request_module() from an async context when called from intel_dp_detect

Hi Hans, On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 04:33:38PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 2/17/21 5:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On 17/02/2021 16:11, Sean Young wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 04:04:11PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> On

Re: [Intel-gfx] Issue with cec_register_adapter calling request_module() from an async context when called from intel_dp_detect

Hi, On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 05:29:46PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 17/02/2021 16:11, Sean Young wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 04:04:11PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> On 2/17/21 3:32 PM, Sean Young wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:41:46PM +0100,

Re: [Intel-gfx] Issue with cec_register_adapter calling request_module() from an async context when called from intel_dp_detect

Hi, On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 04:04:11PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 2/17/21 3:32 PM, Sean Young wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:41:46PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >> Hi Hans, > >> > >> On 17/02/2021 13:24, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] Issue with cec_register_adapter calling request_module() from an async context when called from intel_dp_detect

); > > > > The call-path leading to this goes like this: > > > > ? kvasprintf+0x6d/0xa0 > > ? kobject_set_name_vargs+0x6f/0x90 > > rc_map_get+0x30/0x60 > > It's not CEC, it is rc_map_get that calls request_module() for rc-cec.ko. > > I've added Sean Y

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 07:58:06AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 15:19 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley > > wrote: > > > It's not about the risk of the changes it's about the cost of > > > implementing them. Even if you

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/10] pwm: add PWM mode to pwm_config()

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:01:16PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Add PWM mode to pwm_config() function. The drivers which uses pwm_config() > were adapted to this change. > > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea > --- -snip- > diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c