Re: [Intel-gfx] Scaling control for HDMI output from GM45?

2011-05-03 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:53:45PM -0700, Joshua Redstone wrote: [...] I tried plugging my laptop into other tvs (LG and Samsung) and they have a 'just scan' option [...] I'm returning the Sony tv and switching to LG/Samsung. I have an ASUS P5E-VM HDMI board plugged into an older model Sony

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-27 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 01:11:02AM +, Nasa wrote: Looking at your info it looks like your hsync is 30.3 (am I reading that right?), which is lower than the default set by the driver -- which is 31. I know this because I tried a host of modelines in the monitor section (a file in

Re: [Intel-gfx] Problems configuring unique xorg.conf file

2010-09-26 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:26:21AM +, Nasa wrote: 800x480 is what I am/should be attempting to get... [...] I apologize for not following the thread too closely but if you're just looking for working 800x...@60 timings, this is the native resolution of the panel on my Asus EEE PC and xrandr

Re: [Intel-gfx] Using quirks to fix incorrect Monitor physical size

2010-09-13 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:42:22AM +, Nasa wrote: [...] I have also verified that the monitor doesn't provide EDID data as the file size (I found were it's dump to, just can't recall right now) was 0. [...] You checked the size of the /sys/devices/*/*/drm/*/*/edid structure (remember to

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-31 Thread The Fungi
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 09:49:53AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: It's possible but improbable. What kernel are you running anyway? That system had 2.6.35-rc5 i686 with PAE at the last boot (needed some patches for Wacom BT/HID support which got integrated in rc4 or rc5). I'll most likely replace

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-31 Thread The Fungi
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:28:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: Sigh, okay. You should be able to get the complete EDID block out of /sys/class/drm/card0/*/edid [...] Aha! Mystery solved... so here's the diff in edid-decode output between feeding it the EDID reoprted by get-edid/xrandr --verbose

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:44:49PM +, Nasa wrote: The only possible solution is to try and use xrandr to change the resolution after X is started. Use a combination of CVT (to create modelines) and xrandr to to change the resolutions. I used to have to do the same, and had this at the top

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:19:23PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: Pretty sure parse-edid doesn't understand CEA extension blocks. The kernel does though. Aha--that probably explains it. Are there any userspace alternatives to parse-edid which implement this? If not, I'll look at coming up with a

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 965 and Custom Resolutions

2010-08-30 Thread The Fungi
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:56:26PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/edid-decode I try to keep that reasonably up to date, though it's lagging a little. Do let me know if you have patches for it. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to explain where my