Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.1->4.2 regression : intel_display.c:12324check_crtc_state warning

2015-09-08 Thread Tomas Melin
Toralf Förster gmx.de> writes: > > On 09/02/2015 10:31 PM, Konduru, Chandra wrote: > > It is due to ips_enabled mismatch in crtc_state. > > I can't think how below patch is triggering mismatch in ips_enabled. > > tested it 2 times in a row, the bad commits fails, the commit before works fine.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: don't check inconsistent modeset state when force-restoring

2013-04-11 Thread Tomas Melin
9f498da114cea3d82c291b7090d4441664d7870c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomas Melin tomas.me...@iki.fi Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:53:42 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] applied patch --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 36 +++--- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: don't check inconsistent modeset state when force-restoring

2013-04-11 Thread Tomas Melin
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Tomas Melin tomas.me...@iki.fi wrote: On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote: v2: Try harder not to create a big patch (Chris). Tested the patch applied to 3.9-rc6. Atleast on my machine that helped, although once I managed