Re: [CI 0/6] drm/i915: cleanup dead code

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:56:51AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >>On Tue, 19 Mar 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c.rej | 18 + >>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c.rej >> >>Whoops.

Re: [CI 0/6] drm/i915: cleanup dead code

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:56:51AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 19 Mar 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c.rej | 18 + create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c.rej Whoops. [1] argh... sorry about that. Should I just amend the

Re: [CI 0/6] drm/i915: cleanup dead code

On Tue, 19 Mar 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c.rej | 18 + > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c.rej Whoops. [1] BR, Jani. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240325083435.4f970...@canb.auug.org.au -- Jani Nikula, Intel

Re: [CI 0/6] drm/i915: cleanup dead code

On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:02:57PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: For CI coverage. No change from previous version except the rebase. See 20240312235145.2443975-1-lucas.demar...@intel.com and 20240312235145.2443975-1-lucas.demar...@intel.com for details. I will probably wait the drm-next backmerg

[CI 0/6] drm/i915: cleanup dead code

For CI coverage. No change from previous version except the rebase. See 20240312235145.2443975-1-lucas.demar...@intel.com and 20240312235145.2443975-1-lucas.demar...@intel.com for details. I will probably wait the drm-next backmerge anyway so drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next are back in sync.