Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] gvt-next for 4.16

2017-11-17 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:02:51AM +, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > On 2017.11.16 12:20:14 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi Zhenyu, > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:20:07AM +, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As we missed 4.15 cycle, here's the bigger initial 4.16 gvt-next pull,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] gvt-next for 4.16

2017-11-16 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2017.11.16 12:20:14 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Zhenyu, > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:20:07AM +, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > As we missed 4.15 cycle, here's the bigger initial 4.16 gvt-next pull, > > which includes many improvements as noted below. > > > > thanks > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] gvt-next for 4.16

2017-11-16 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Zhenyu, On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:20:07AM +, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > As we missed 4.15 cycle, here's the bigger initial 4.16 gvt-next pull, > which includes many improvements as noted below. > > thanks > > -- > The following changes since commit

[Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] gvt-next for 4.16

2017-11-16 Thread Zhenyu Wang
Hi, As we missed 4.15 cycle, here's the bigger initial 4.16 gvt-next pull, which includes many improvements as noted below. thanks -- The following changes since commit 34cc9efc27e2623c76a69d2ad1fa2b972e27a2c1: drm/i915: Remove pre-production pooled-EU w/a for Broxton (2017-11-15 18:04:18