On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:30 +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 04:54:46PM +0800, Xiang, Haihao wrote:
From: Xiang, Haihao haihao.xi...@intel.com
Emit PIPELINE_SELECT twice and make sure the commands in
the first batch buffer have been done.
However I don't know
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Xiang, Haihao haihao.xi...@intel.com wrote:
Oh, it works even with an batch which has only MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END.
This sounds like we're missing a tlb/cache invalidate before launching
the batch in the kernel. But the big flush we unconditionally do after
each batch
From: Xiang, Haihao haihao.xi...@intel.com
Emit PIPELINE_SELECT twice and make sure the commands in
the first batch buffer have been done.
However I don't know why this works !!!
Signed-off-by: Xiang, Haihao haihao.xi...@intel.com
---
lib/rendercopy_gen8.c | 19 +--
1 file
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 04:54:46PM +0800, Xiang, Haihao wrote:
From: Xiang, Haihao haihao.xi...@intel.com
Emit PIPELINE_SELECT twice and make sure the commands in
the first batch buffer have been done.
However I don't know why this works !!!
Hum :) on one hand, it's great that you found