Daniel Vetter writes:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:19:54AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Daniel Vetter writes:
>> > Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
>> > all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
>> > it all fell apart.
>> >
>> > Ev
Daniel Vetter writes:
> Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
> all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
> it all fell apart.
>
> Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when some change only
> just made the feature possible (e.g. s
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> If this is a good idea, you can write a macro module_param_unsafe_named
>>> which is a general wrapper.
>>
>> For this to work I need to somehow store the safe default value somewhere.
>> since with bools or strings there really isn't such a
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:19:54AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Daniel Vetter writes:
> > Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
> > all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
> > it all fell apart.
> >
> > Even more fun when it's labelled
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
>>> all the experimental stuff helps. Later o
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
>
>> Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
>> all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
>> it all fell apart.
>>
>> Even mor
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
> all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
> it all fell apart.
>
> Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when some change only
> ju
Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
it all fell apart.
Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when some change only
just made the feature possible (e.g. stolen memory fixes suddenly
making