[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-fence: add might_sleep annotation to _wait()

Do it uncontionally, there's a separate peek function with dma_fence_is_signalled() which can be called from atomic context. v2: Consensus calls for an unconditional might_sleep (Chris, Christian) Full audit: - dma-fence.h: Uses MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMOUT, good chance this sleeps - dma-resv.c: Timeout a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-fence: add might_sleep annotation to _wait()

Quoting Daniel Vetter (2020-05-19 14:27:56) > Do it uncontionally, there's a separate peek function with > dma_fence_is_signalled() which can be called from atomic context. > > v2: Consensus calls for an unconditional might_sleep (Chris, > Christian) > > Full audit: > - dma-fence.h: Uses MAX_SCHE

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-fence: add might_sleep annotation to _wait()

Am 19.05.20 um 15:27 schrieb Daniel Vetter: Do it uncontionally, there's a separate peek function with dma_fence_is_signalled() which can be called from atomic context. v2: Consensus calls for an unconditional might_sleep (Chris, Christian) Full audit: - dma-fence.h: Uses MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMOUT, g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-fence: add might_sleep annotation to _wait()

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:54:36AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 19.05.20 um 15:27 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > Do it uncontionally, there's a separate peek function with > > dma_fence_is_signalled() which can be called from atomic context. > > > > v2: Consensus calls for an unconditional might