Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic-helper: nonblocking commit support

2016-05-31 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:22:57PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 30-05-16 om 10:01 schreef Daniel Vetter: > > Design ideas: > > > > - split up the actual commit into different phases, and have > > completions for each of them. This will be useful for the future > > when we want to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic-helper: nonblocking commit support

2016-05-31 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 30-05-16 om 10:01 schreef Daniel Vetter: > Design ideas: > > - split up the actual commit into different phases, and have > completions for each of them. This will be useful for the future > when we want to interleave phases much more aggressively, for e.g. > queue depth > 1. For not it's

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic-helper: nonblocking commit support

2016-05-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
Design ideas: - split up the actual commit into different phases, and have completions for each of them. This will be useful for the future when we want to interleave phases much more aggressively, for e.g. queue depth > 1. For not it's just a minimal optimization compared to current