Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but with signaling.

2017-06-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 04:11:35PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: > > > On 06/19/2017 03:24 PM, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:35:28AM -0400, Harry Wentland wrote: > > > On 2017-06-09 05:30 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: > > > > Problem: > > > > While running IGT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but with signaling.

2017-06-19 Thread Andrey Grodzovsky
On 06/19/2017 03:24 PM, Sean Paul wrote: On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:35:28AM -0400, Harry Wentland wrote: On 2017-06-09 05:30 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: Problem: While running IGT kms_atomic_transition test suite i encountered a hang in drmHandleEvent immidietly follwoing an atomic_commit.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but with signaling.

2017-06-19 Thread Sean Paul
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:35:28AM -0400, Harry Wentland wrote: > On 2017-06-09 05:30 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: > > Problem: > > While running IGT kms_atomic_transition test suite i encountered > > a hang in drmHandleEvent immidietly follwoing an atomic_commit. > > s/immidietly/immediately/g >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but with signaling.

2017-06-19 Thread Harry Wentland
On 2017-06-09 05:30 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: > Problem: > While running IGT kms_atomic_transition test suite i encountered > a hang in drmHandleEvent immidietly follwoing an atomic_commit. s/immidietly/immediately/g s/follwoing/following/g > After dumping the atomic state I relized that in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but with signaling.

2017-06-15 Thread Andrey Grodzovsky
Just a reminder. Thanks. On 06/09/2017 05:30 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: Problem: While running IGT kms_atomic_transition test suite i encountered a hang in drmHandleEvent immidietly follwoing an atomic_commit. After dumping the atomic state I relized that in this case there was not even one

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but with signaling.

2017-06-12 Thread Andrey Grodzovsky
On 06/12/2017 07:08 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Op 09-06-17 om 23:30 schreef Andrey Grodzovsky: Problem: While running IGT kms_atomic_transition test suite i encountered a hang in drmHandleEvent immidietly follwoing an atomic_commit. After dumping the atomic state I relized that in this case

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but with signaling.

2017-06-12 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 09-06-17 om 23:30 schreef Andrey Grodzovsky: > Problem: > While running IGT kms_atomic_transition test suite i encountered > a hang in drmHandleEvent immidietly follwoing an atomic_commit. > After dumping the atomic state I relized that in this case there was > not even one CRTC attached to the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Fail atomic IOCTL with no CRTC state but with signaling.

2017-06-09 Thread Andrey Grodzovsky
Problem: While running IGT kms_atomic_transition test suite i encountered a hang in drmHandleEvent immidietly follwoing an atomic_commit. After dumping the atomic state I relized that in this case there was not even one CRTC attached to the state and only disabled planes. This probably due to a