Hey,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > /* need to hold at least one crtc lock for the global state */
> > - crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, PIPE_A);
>
> Was thinking a simple 'return 0' would do the trick, but maybe we
> don't want to call this at all. OTOH not sure
Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2020-02-03 13:23:17)
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 09:46:41AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > -static int glk_force_audio_cdclk_commit(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > +static int glk_force_audio_cdclk_commit(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > +
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 09:46:41AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If the display is not driving any pipes, we cannot change the bclk and
> doing so risks chasing NULL pointers:
>
> <6> [278.907105] snd_hda_intel :00:0e.0: DSP detected with PCI
> class/subclass/prog-if info 0x040100
> <6>
On Sat, 01 Feb 2020, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-02-01 12:36:46)
>> On Sat, 01 Feb 2020, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> > If the display is not driving any pipes, we cannot change the bclk and
>> > doing so risks chasing NULL pointers:
>>
>> Does this mean we can't probe hda if
Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-02-01 12:36:46)
> On Sat, 01 Feb 2020, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > If the display is not driving any pipes, we cannot change the bclk and
> > doing so risks chasing NULL pointers:
>
> Does this mean we can't probe hda if there are no displays attached at
> boot on GLK?
We
On Sat, 01 Feb 2020, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If the display is not driving any pipes, we cannot change the bclk and
> doing so risks chasing NULL pointers:
Does this mean we can't probe hda if there are no displays attached at
boot on GLK?
BR,
Jani.
>
> <6> [278.907105] snd_hda_intel
If the display is not driving any pipes, we cannot change the bclk and
doing so risks chasing NULL pointers:
<6> [278.907105] snd_hda_intel :00:0e.0: DSP detected with PCI
class/subclass/prog-if info 0x040100
<6> [278.909936] snd_hda_intel :00:0e.0: bound :00:02.0 (ops
